| Literature DB >> 35831466 |
Yahya Pasdar1, Shima Moradi1, Saman Saedi2, Mehdi Moradinazar3, Negin Rahmani4, Behrooz Hamzeh5, Farid Najafi6.
Abstract
The Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet is an eating pattern associated with multiple health benefits, including the conservation of skeletal muscle. The Hand Grip Strength (HGS) is the most frequently used indicator of muscle functional capacity and muscle strength for clinical purposes. The current study aims to investigate the association between adherence to MIND diet and prevention of age-associated decline in muscle strength among the Kurdish population in Iran. This cross-sectional study was performed using data from Ravansar non-communicable diseases (RaNCD) cohort study on 3181 adults (48.5% men) aged 35-65 years. The dietary intake of the studied participants was assessed using a 114-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed by RaNCD cohort study. The MIND diet and the major dietary patterns were identified based on the participants' dietary intake and three dietary patterns emerged including plant-based diet, high protein diet, and unhealthy diet. Hand grip strength (HGS) was measured using a hand-held hydraulic handgrip dynamometer and poor HGS was defined as HGS less than 32.8 and 20.5 kg in men and women, respectively. Compared with participants in the lowest category of MIND diet, those in the highest category had lower odds of poor HGS (OR: 0.65; CI 95%: 0.51-0.83). Furthermore, participants who were in third tertiles of plant-based and high protein diet were more likely 37% and 33% lower odds ratio of poor HGS (OR: 0.63; CI 95%: 0.5-0.79), (OR: 0.67; CI 95%: 0.54-0.84), respectively. On the other hand, greater adherence to the unhealthy diet was increased odds of poor HGS (OR: 1.39; CI 95%: 1.11-1.74). Overall, our findings suggest that adherence to the MIND diet and high protein diet may be associated with higher HGS, while adherence to the unhealthy diet can increase the odds of age-associated poor HGS in the Kurdish population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35831466 PMCID: PMC9279400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16120-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flow chart of participants selection for this study.
Basic characteristics of participants.
| Characteristics | Total (n = 3181) | Tertiles of MIND Diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (n = 1309) (< 6) | T2 (n = 826) (6–7.5) | T3 (n = 1046) (7.5–12.5) | |||
| Age (year) | 46.17 ± 8* | 46.81 ± 8.35 | 45.93 ± 7.94 | 45.45 ± 7.36 | < 0.001 |
| Gender, male (%) | 48.5 | 37 | 52 | 63.1 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 70.7 ± 13.71 | 68.68 ± 13.45 | 70.90 ± 13.44 | 73.90 ± 13.94 | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.62 ± 4.63 | 26.47 ± 4.67 | 26.56 ± 4.62 | 26.95 ± 4.56 | 0.072 |
| WC | 96.83 ± 10.38 | 96.41 ± 10.57 | 96.59 ± 10.24 | 97.93 ± 10.17 | 0.004 |
| BFM (kg) | 23.47 ± 9.29 | 23.45 ± 9.32 | 23.29 ± 9.35 | 23.77 ± 9.16 | 0.542 |
| SLM (kg) | 44.69 ± 8.95 | 42.82 ± 8.68 | 45.01 ± 8.65 | 47.43 ± 9.09 | < 0.001 |
| FFM (kg) | 47.24 ± 9.44 | 45.27 ± 9.14 | 47.58 ± 9.14 | 50.14 ± 9.60 | < 0.001 |
| SMM (kg) | 26.13 ± 5.72 | 24.93 ± 5.54 | 26.34 ± 5.54 | 27.90 ± 5.81 | < 0.001 |
| PBF (%) | 32.57 ± 9.41 | 33.48 ± 9.46 | 32.20 ± 9.46 | 31.59 ± 9.10 | < 0.001 |
| HGS (kg) | 32.61 ± 11.31 | 30.12 ± 10.52 | 33.21 ± 11.36 | 36.01 ± 11.54 | < 0.001 |
| PA (MET hour/day) | 41.67 ± 7.77 | 41.89 ± 7.09 | 41.58 ± 8.33 | 41.44 ± 8.04 | 0.398 |
| Smoking (%) | 18.4 | 16 | 18.7 | 22.1 | 0.003 |
| Obese (%) | 20.8 | 20.5 | 19.1 | 22.6 | 0.472 |
| Hypertension (%) | 4 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 0.27 |
| Hypercholesterolemia (%) | 16.9 | 16.5 | 18.2 | 16.4 | 0.527 |
*Mean ± SD.
**P values were obtained one-way ANOVA and Chi square.
BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, BFM body fat mass, SLM soft lean mass, FFM free fat mass, SMM skeletal muscle mass, PBF percentage body fat, HGS hand grip strength, PA physical activity.
Factor loading of food groups in the major identified dietary patterns.
| Food groups | Major dietary patterns | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant- based dietary pattern | High protein dietary pattern | Unhealthy dietary pattern | |
| Leafy vegetables | .654 | ||
| Fresh fruits | .600 | .259 | − .215 |
| Starchy vegetables | .568 | ||
| Dried fruits | .469 | − .250 | |
| Potato | .452 | .270 | |
| Nuts | .448 | .364 | |
| Tomato | .422 | .213 | |
| Carotene-rich vegetables | .420 | .213 | − .375 |
| Condiments | .397 | ||
| Dairy | .396 | ||
| Butters | .378 | ||
| Pickles | .327 | ||
| Egg | .314 | .239 | |
| Poultry | .285 | .241 | |
| Whole grains | .236 | .224 | |
| Red meat | .672 | ||
| Viscera | .621 | ||
| Fish | .617 | ||
| Soft drinks | .462 | .244 | |
| Processed meat | .387 | ||
| Legumes | .333 | .378 | |
| Natural juices | .230 | .289 | |
| snack | .240 | ||
| Hydrogenated fats | .587 | ||
| Sweets and desserts | .244 | .225 | .549 |
| Tea and coffee | .538 | ||
| Vegetable oil | .243 | − .403 | |
| Olive | .216 | − .328 | |
| Salt | .317 | ||
| Refined grains | .258 | .278 | |
| Variance % | 11.04 | 8.48 | 6.73 |
Factor loading less than 0.2 have been removed for clarity.
Multiple-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for hand grip strength across of the MIND diet and major identified dietary patterns.
| Dietary patterns | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-trend | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| MIND diet | Crude | 1 | 0.82 (0.68–0.99) | 0.57 (0.45–0.71) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.89 (0.73–1.08) | 0.63 (0.5–0.81) | 0.004 | |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.9 (0.73–1.1) | 0.65 (0.51–0.83) | 0.007 | |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1 (0.81–1.2) | 0.73 (0.59–0.91) | 0.008 | |
| Plant- based diet | Crude | 1 | 0.79 (0.65–0.97) | 0.53 (0.43–0.66) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.9 (0.73–1.11) | 0.61 (0.49–0.77) | < 0.001 | |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.92 (0.74–1.13) | 0.63 (0.5–0.79) | < 0.001 | |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.98 (0.78–1.22) | 0.72 (0.55–0.94) | 0.02 | |
| High protein diet | Crude | 1 | 0.75 (0.62–0.92) | 0.51 (0.41–0.63) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.88 (0.71–1.08) | 0.66 (0.53–0.83) | < 0.001 | |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.88 (0.71–1.09) | 0.67 (0.54–0.84) | 0.001 | |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.93 (0.75–1.16) | 0.77 (0.6–0.99) | 0.046 | |
| Unhealthy diet | Crude | 1 | 1.21 (0.98–1.49) | 1.49 (1.21–1.84) | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.11 (0.88–1.38) | 1.33 (1.07–1.66) | 0.008 | |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.12 (0.89–1.4) | 1.39 (1.11–1.74) | 0.003 | |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.19 (0.95–1.5) | 1.77 (1.38–2.26) | < 0.001 | |
*Model 1 adjusted for age and gender.
*Model 2 adjusted for variables in model 1, physical activity, BMI, and smoking.
*Model 3 adjusted for all variables in previous models plus energy intake.
Multiple-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for hand grip strength across of the components of MIND diet.
| Components of MIND diet | OR (CI 95%)* | |
|---|---|---|
| Green leafy vegetables | 0.79 (0.62–0.99) | 0.048 |
| Other vegetables | 0.57 (0.45–0.72) | < 0.001 |
| Berries | 0.65 (0.52–0.81) | < 0.001 |
| Nuts | 0.95 (0.75–1.2) | 0.693 |
| Whole grains | 0.77 (0.67–0.97) | 0.027 |
| Fish | 0.69 (0.55–0.86) | 0.001 |
| Beans | 0.9 (0.71–1.12) | 0.364 |
| Poultry | 1.08 (0.88–1.32) | 0.427 |
| Olive | 0.51 (0.4- 0.65) | < 0.001 |
| Butter, margarine | 1.06 (0.85–1.33) | 0.558 |
| Cheese | 0.93 (0.73–1.12) | 0.384 |
| Red meat and products | 1.43 (1.12–1.83) | 0.004 |
| Fast fried foods | 1.33 (1.07–1.67) | 0.01 |
| Pastries and sweets | 1.42 (1.12–1.8) | 0.003 |
*Adjusted for all variables in Table 3.
Figure 2Radar graph for the mean of components of MIND diet in weak and optimal hand grip strength (HGS).