Stefan Hm Gorissen1, Astrid Mh Horstman1, Rinske Franssen1, Julie Jr Crombag1, Henning Langer1, Jörgen Bierau2, Frederique Respondek3, Luc Jc van Loon4. 1. NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism and. 2. Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; and. 3. Innovation, Tereos, Marckolsheim, France. 4. NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism and l.vanloon@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muscle mass maintenance is largely regulated by basal muscle protein synthesis and the capacity to stimulate muscle protein synthesis after food intake. The postprandial muscle proteinsynthetic response is modulated by the amount, source, and type of protein consumed. It has been suggested that plant-based proteins are less potent in stimulating postprandial muscle protein synthesis than animal-derived proteins. However, few data support this contention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess postprandial plasma amino acid concentrations and muscle protein synthesis rates after the ingestion of a substantial 35-g bolus of wheat protein hydrolysate compared with casein and whey protein. METHODS:Sixty healthy older men [mean ± SEM age: 71 ± 1 y; body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 25.3 ± 0.3] received a primed continuous infusion of l-[ring-(13)C6]-phenylalanine and ingested 35 g wheat protein (n = 12), 35 g wheat protein hydrolysate (WPH-35; n = 12), 35 g micellar casein (MCas-35; n = 12), 35 g whey protein (Whey-35; n = 12), or 60 g wheat protein hydrolysate (WPH-60; n = 12). Plasma and muscle samples were collected at regular intervals. RESULTS: The postprandial increase in plasma essential amino acid concentrations was greater after ingesting Whey-35 (2.23 ± 0.07 mM) than after MCas-35 (1.53 ± 0.08 mM) and WPH-35 (1.50 ± 0.04 mM) (P < 0.01). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates increased after ingesting MCas-35 (P < 0.01) and were higher after ingesting MCas-35 (0.050% ± 0.005%/h) than after WPH-35 (0.032% ± 0.004%/h) (P = 0.03). The postprandial increase in plasma leucine concentrations was greater after ingesting Whey-35 than after WPH-60 (peak value: 580 ± 18 compared with 378 ± 10 μM, respectively; P < 0.01), despite similar leucine contents (4.4 g leucine). Nevertheless, the ingestion of WPH-60 increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates above basal rates (0.049% ± 0.007%/h; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The myofibrillar protein synthetic response to the ingestion of 35 g casein is greater than after an equal amount of wheat protein. Ingesting a larger amount of wheat protein (i.e., 60 g) substantially increases myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in healthy older men. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01952639.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Muscle mass maintenance is largely regulated by basal muscle protein synthesis and the capacity to stimulate muscle protein synthesis after food intake. The postprandial muscle protein synthetic response is modulated by the amount, source, and type of protein consumed. It has been suggested that plant-based proteins are less potent in stimulating postprandial muscle protein synthesis than animal-derived proteins. However, few data support this contention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess postprandial plasma amino acid concentrations and muscle protein synthesis rates after the ingestion of a substantial 35-g bolus of wheat protein hydrolysate compared with casein and whey protein. METHODS: Sixty healthy older men [mean ± SEM age: 71 ± 1 y; body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 25.3 ± 0.3] received a primed continuous infusion of l-[ring-(13)C6]-phenylalanine and ingested 35 g wheat protein (n = 12), 35 g wheat protein hydrolysate (WPH-35; n = 12), 35 g micellar casein (MCas-35; n = 12), 35 g whey protein (Whey-35; n = 12), or 60 g wheat protein hydrolysate (WPH-60; n = 12). Plasma and muscle samples were collected at regular intervals. RESULTS: The postprandial increase in plasma essential amino acid concentrations was greater after ingesting Whey-35 (2.23 ± 0.07 mM) than after MCas-35 (1.53 ± 0.08 mM) and WPH-35 (1.50 ± 0.04 mM) (P < 0.01). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates increased after ingesting MCas-35 (P < 0.01) and were higher after ingesting MCas-35 (0.050% ± 0.005%/h) than after WPH-35 (0.032% ± 0.004%/h) (P = 0.03). The postprandial increase in plasma leucine concentrations was greater after ingesting Whey-35 than after WPH-60 (peak value: 580 ± 18 compared with 378 ± 10 μM, respectively; P < 0.01), despite similar leucine contents (4.4 g leucine). Nevertheless, the ingestion of WPH-60 increased myofibrillar protein synthesis rates above basal rates (0.049% ± 0.007%/h; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The myofibrillar protein synthetic response to the ingestion of 35 g casein is greater than after an equal amount of wheat protein. Ingesting a larger amount of wheat protein (i.e., 60 g) substantially increases myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in healthy older men. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01952639.
Authors: F Landi; R Calvani; M Tosato; A M Martone; A Picca; E Ortolani; G Savera; S Salini; M Ramaschi; R Bernabei; E Marzetti Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Pariya Behrouzi; Pol Grootswagers; Paul L C Keizer; Ellen T H C Smeets; Edith J M Feskens; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Fred A van Eeuwijk Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Andrew M Holwerda; Kevin J M Paulussen; Maarten Overkamp; Joy P B Goessens; Irene Fleur Kramer; Will K W H Wodzig; Lex B Verdijk; Luc J C van Loon Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Francesco Carli; Guillaume Bousquet-Dion; Rashami Awasthi; Noha Elsherbini; Sender Liberman; Marylise Boutros; Barry Stein; Patrick Charlebois; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Nancy Morin; Thomas Jagoe; Celena Scheede-Bergdahl; Enrico Maria Minnella; Julio F Fiore Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Victoria Hevia-Larraín; Bruno Gualano; Igor Longobardi; Saulo Gil; Alan L Fernandes; Luiz A R Costa; Rosa M R Pereira; Guilherme G Artioli; Stuart M Phillips; Hamilton Roschel Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Alistair J Monteyne; Mandy V Dunlop; David J Machin; Mariana O C Coelho; George F Pavis; Craig Porter; Andrew J Murton; Doaa R Abdelrahman; Marlou L Dirks; Francis B Stephens; Benjamin T Wall Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.718