| Literature DB >> 35830432 |
Valentin Sencio1,2,3,4,5, Nicolas Benech3,5, Cyril Robil1,2,3,4,5, Lucie Deruyter1,2,3,4,5, Séverine Heumel1,2,3,4,5, Arnaud Machelart1,2,3,4,5, Thierry Sulpice6, Antonin Lamazière7,8, Corinne Grangette1,2,3,4,5, François Briand6, Harry Sokol7,8,9, François Trottein1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Obese patientss with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are particularly prone to developing severe forms of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). The gut-to-lung axis is critical during viral infections of the respiratory tract, and a change in the gut microbiota's composition might have a critical role in disease severity. Here, we investigated the consequences of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the gut microbiota in the context of obesity and NASH. To this end, we set up a nutritional model of obesity with dyslipidemia and NASH in the golden hamster, a relevant preclinical model of COVID-19. Relative to lean non-NASH controls, obese NASH hamsters develop severe inflammation of the lungs and liver. 16S rRNA gene profiling showed that depending on the diet, SARS-CoV-2 infection induced various changes in the gut microbiota's composition. Changes were more prominent and transient at day 4 post-infection in lean animals, alterations still persisted at day 10 in obese NASH animals. A targeted, quantitative metabolomic analysis revealed changes in the gut microbiota's metabolic output, some of which were diet-specific and regulated over time. Our results showed that specifically diet-associated taxa are correlated with disease parameters. Correlations between infection variables and diet-associated taxa highlighted a number of potentially protective or harmful bacteria in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters. In particular, some taxa in obese NASH hamsters (e.g. Blautia and Peptococcus) were associated with pro-inflammatory parameters in both the lungs and the liver. These taxon profiles and their association with specific disease markers suggest that microbial patterns might influence COVID-19 outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; NASH; SARS-CoV-2; gut microbiota; hamsters; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35830432 PMCID: PMC9291689 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2100200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Microbes ISSN: 1949-0976
Figure 1.Establishment of a sublethal model of SARS-CoV-2 infection in obese NASH hamsters. (a), Clinical and biochemical parameters in lean and obese NASH hamsters. Body weight, total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in serum and liver pathology are shown. Total nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score and sirius red labeling score are depicted. (b), Lean and obese NASH hamsters were inoculated with 2 × 104 tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) of the clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate hCoV-19/France/lDF0372/2020. Histopathological examination of lung sections of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters lean and obese NASH hamsters (10 dpi). Representative images of lungs (hematoxylin and eosin staining) are depicted (x20). (c), Blinded sections were scored for levels of pathological severity. To evaluate comprehensive histological changes, lung tissue sections were scored based on criteria indicated in the panel. The following scoring system was used: 0, no pathological change; 1, affected area (≤10%); 2, affected area (<50%, >10%); 3, affected area (≥50%). The average sum of different parameters is shown. (d), Infectious viral loads in the lungs at D4. Data are expressed as the number of infectious virus particles per lung. At D10, no virus was detected in the lungs (not shown). (e and f), The liver of mock-infected and SARS-CoV-2-infected lean and obese NASH hamsters were collected at D4 and D10. mRNA copy numbers of genes were quantified by RT-PCR. Data are expressed as fold increase ± SD over average gene expression in mock-treated lean animals. (a-f), A representative experiment out of two is shown (n = 3–6/time point). Significant differences were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest (*P < .05; ** P < .01; *** P < .001) .
Figure 2.Changes over time of the gut microbiota’s composition during SARS-CoV-2 infection in lean and obese NASH hamsters. a, Shannon index and Chao1 index describing the α diversity of the bacterial microbiota in the various groups studied. Significant differences were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest (*P < .05). b, Principal coordinate analysis of Bray-Curtis distance with each sample colored according to SARS-CoV-2 infection status and diet. PCoA1 and PCoA2 represent the top two principal coordinates that captured most of the diversity. The fraction of diversity captured by the coordinate is given as a percentage. Groups were compared using Permanova method (999 permutations). (c) and (d), Global composition of bacterial microbiota at the phylum (c) and genus (d) levels. Colored blocks indicate taxa with an average relative abundance. A representative experiment out of two is shown (n = 3–6/time point) (*P < .05) .
Figure 3.Alterations in the fecal microbiota’s composition over the course of a SARS-CoV-2 infection in lean and obese hamsters. a, A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis was performed to represent bacterial taxa changed over the course of the infection according to the diet of the animals. Only taxa with a statistically significant LDA score (log10) > 2 (compared with mock and/or compared to normal diet) are shown. The heat map on the left panel shows the relative abundance of the taxa, and the heat map on the right shows the LDA scores. The taxa are clustered by abundance pattern by day and diet using K-mean clustering (one minus cosine similarity). b, Maaslin2 analysis at the genus level of fecal bacteria associated with lean/NASH obese conditions adjusted for SARS-CoV-2 infection status.
Figure 4.Alteration in fecal metabolite production during a SARS-CoV-2 infection. SCFAs (a), BAs (b and c) and tryptophan metabolites (d) were measured in fecal samples from each animal and at each time point, using targeted quantitative metabolomics. Values for individual animals are presented. CA, cholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; LCA, lithocholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; ILA, indole-3-lactic acid; 3-IPA, 3-Indole propionic acid; TOL, indole-3-ethanol; IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; TA, tryptamine KA, kynurenic acid; 3-HAA, 3-hydroxyanthranilic Acid; QA, quinolinic acid. A representative experiment out of two is shown (n = 3–6/time point). Significant differences were determined using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s posttest (*P < .05). To compare values between lean and obese NASH hamsters at D0, a student t test was used.
Figure 5.Correlation between diet-associated bacterial taxa and infection-related variables. Heatmap of Spearman coefficient between SARS-CoV-2 infection related variables and taxa at the genus level selected from the MaAsLin2 analysis of Figure 3b. Taxa and SARS-CoV-2 infection related variables are clustered by diet-specificity. Only significant correlations (p < .05 and q < 0.25 after correction for the false discovery rate, using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) are shown.
Oligonucleotide sequences used in this study
| F 5’-ACAGAGAGAAGATGACGCAGATAATG-3’ | F 5’-GGTTGCCAAACCTTATCAGAAATG-3’ | ||
| R 5’-GCCTGAATGGCCACGTACA-3’ | R 5’-TTCACCTGTTCCACAGCCTTG-3’ | ||
| F 5’-GTGARATGGTCATGTGTGGCGG-3’ | F 5’-AATGCGAGGCAGCAAATTACTC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-CARATGTTAAASACACTATTAGCATA-3’ | R 5’-CTGCTCTTGACGTTGAACTTCAAG-3’ | ||
| F 5’-CTCTGCCATGCTTTTGTGCC-3’ | F 5’-CCAACCAGCCATTGATCCCT-3’ | ||
| R 5’-ATCAGCCCATCTCACCACAG-3’ | R 5’-TCACAACGTTGGTCCCTGAG-3’ | ||
| F 5’-ACAAGCCCTCTGTGCAATCA-3’ | F 5’-CTCTCGAATCCATGACGGGG-3’ | ||
| R 5’-GGGGCTGTTATCAGGGAGTG-3’ | R 5’-AACACCAGAGGAAGCCATCG-3’ | ||
| F 5’-CCCGTCGAGAGCTTGATACC-3’ | F 5’-GGAAAACGAAAACGCCTCCC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-AGTGTGCTGATATCGAGGCG-3’ | R 5’-AAAATGGATGACCGGACCCC-3’ | ||
| F 5’-GAGGCCTCTGCTCTTCACTC-3’ | F 5’-GGTATCGTTACCAGGTGCCC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-AAGAAACAAACGCCGTCAGC-3’ | R 5’-GGTCTGGAACACTTGGGGAG-3’ | ||
| F 5’-TCCCACTCCGCCTCAAGATA-3’ | F 5’-CCAGTAATGTGGACATTGCC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-TGGCGCCGTTGGTGTC-3’ | R 5’-CATCAACGACCTTGTCTTCAGTA-3’ | ||
| F 5’-TACGTCGGCCTATGGCTACT-3’ | F 5’-TCCATGCGGTTGAACCCTAC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-TTGGGGACTCTTGTCACTGG-3’ | R 5’-TGTCAGTGTTCTGTGCTCACTT-3’ | ||
| F 5’-TGGGGACCATATCCAGAGCA-3’ | F 5’-ACTGCTCACGACTGAGTGTC-3’ | ||
| R 5’-GGCTTCATCTCTCTCGGCTC-3’ | R 5’-GCCAGGCCCACCTTTATCAT-3’ | ||
| F 5’-GAAGTCAAAACCAAGGTGGAGTTT-3’ | F 5’-CACGAGTCTAGCAAGGGACA-3’ | ||
| R 5’-TCTGCTTGAGAGGTGCTGATGT-3’ | R 5’-TGGTTTCTATGCTGCGCTCC-3’ | ||
| F 5’-CCATGAGGTCTACTCGGCAAA-3’ | F 5’-CTCCTGCCGCTCAAAAGGA-3’ | ||
| R 5’-GACCACAGTGAATGTCCACAGATC-3’ | R 5’-CGCCGGAAGTAGCACCATTA-3’ |