Literature DB >> 35829764

Comparison of pregnancy and live birth rates between fresh day 5 morula transfer and fresh day 6 blastocyst transfer following extended culture for slow growing embryos.

Firat Tulek1,2, Alper Kahraman3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of fresh day 5 morula transfers and fresh day 6 blastocyst transfers after extended culture, in women with a whole cohort of slow growing embryos.
METHODS: Fresh embryo transfer cycles of patients that underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection between 2013 and 2020 with a whole cohort of slow developing embryos on 5th day of fertilization were evaluated for this retrospective cohort study. Outcomes of day 5 morula transfers and day 6 blastocyst transfers after extended culture were compared.
RESULTS: Out of 479 patients, day 5 morula transfers were performed to 194 and embryo culturing was extended to day 6 in 285 women. Blastocyst formation was observed in 129 of 285 patients in extended culture group. Implantation rate of day 6 blastocyst transfer group was significantly higher than day 5 morula transfer group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). However, clinical pregnancy (17% vs 15.4%) and live birth rates (14.4% vs 13%) were found similar in day 5 morula transfer and extended culture group per initiated cycle.
CONCLUSION: Although implantation capacity of day 6 blastocysts seems higher comparing to day 5 morulas, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates are similar among intention to treat population in fresh day 5 morula transfers and day 6 blastocyst transfers after extended culture for women that cohorts consist of only slow developing embryos.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Day 5 morula; Day 6 blastocyst; Fresh embryo transfer; In-vitro fertilization; Slow growing embryo

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35829764     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06661-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  28 in total

1.  The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.

Authors:  Marcos Meseguer; Javier Herrero; Alberto Tejera; Karen Marie Hilligsøe; Niels Birger Ramsing; Jose Remohí
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Selection of high-potential embryos by culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging.

Authors:  Shu Hashimoto; Nobuhiro Kato; Kazuhiro Saeki; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers.

Authors:  Gorka Barrenetxea; Arantza López de Larruzea; Teresa Ganzabal; Rosario Jiménez; Koldo Carbonero; Miren Mandiola
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kort; Ruth B Lathi; Kathleen Brookfield; Valerie L Baker; Qianying Zhao; Barry R Behr
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Developmental potential of slow-developing embryos: day-5 morulae compared with day-5 cavitating morulae.

Authors:  Jigal Haas; Jim Meriano; Rawad Bassil; Eran Barzilay; Eran Zilberberg; Robert F Casper
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Athanasios Siozos; Virginia Noelle Bolton; Yakoub Khalaf; Peter Riven Braude; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.

Authors:  Maria Giulia Minasi; Alessandro Colasante; Teresa Riccio; Alessandra Ruberti; Valentina Casciani; Filomena Scarselli; Francesca Spinella; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Humberto Restrepo; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Cynthia Hudson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Laura Rienzi; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Maggiulli; Thomas Elliott; Graham Wright; Zsolt Peter Nagy; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?

Authors:  Samer Tannus; Yoni Cohen; Sara Henderson; Na'ama Al Ma'mari; Tal Shavit; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.