Literature DB >> 3582868

[Diagnostic value of gastric pHmetry in duodenogastric reflux].

J Hostein, R Bost, H Faure, B Lachet, J Fournet.   

Abstract

Several studies have been performed to examine the problem of diagnosing gastroduodenal reflux (GDR). No single method is widely accepted. The aim of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic value of gastric pHmetry in this regard. A gastric aspiration probe attached to a combined glass electrode was placed in the stomach of 24 patients, with its distal tip located between 9 and 12 cm below the cardia. One ml samples of gastric juice were taken from 8 of the patients every 30 min for 15 h and as well as, every time a spontaneous alkalinization (SA) (defined by a pH greater than or equal to 4 for at least 1 min) was observed. The pH of each sample was measured by colorimetry whereas the concentration of total biliary acids (CTBA) was evaluated by the fluorimetric method (Kit Sterognost 3 alpha Flu); pH value measured via the intragastric electrode during aspiration was also recorded (protocol A). Continuous gastric aspiration was carried out in the remaining 16 patients for the entire duration of the test (6 h) which was divided into periods of 20 min. Apart from the parameters evaluated during protocol A, the percentage of time during which the stomach had a pH greater than or equal to 4 was recorded, as well as the quantity of total biliary acids collected over the 20 min periods (protocol B). Correlation studies were carried out using the Kendall tau and Spearman tests. Percentages were compared using the chi 2 test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3582868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  7 in total

1.  Indications for 24-hour gastric pH monitoring with single and multiple probes in clinical research and practice.

Authors:  S Mattioli; V Felice; V Pilotti; M L Bacchi; M Pàstina; G Gozzetti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Intragastric pH monitoring is unsuitable for diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  J Hostein; R Bost
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Protective effect of tauroursodeoxycholate against acute gastric mucosal injury induced by hydrophobic bile salts.

Authors:  M Muraca; E Zanusso; V Cianci; M T Vilei; P Pazzi; M Dalla Libera; S Gamberini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of gastric body and antral pH: a 24 hour ambulatory study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  G McLauchlan; G M Fullarton; G P Crean; K E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique.

Authors:  P Bechi; F Pucciani; F Baldini; F Cosi; R Falciai; R Mazzanti; A Castagnoli; A Passeri; S Boscherini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Low bedtime doses of H2-receptor antagonists for acute treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  V Savarino; G S Mela; P Zentilin; G Bonifacino; M Moretti; F Valle; G Celle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Is there an abnormal fasting duodenogastric reflux in nonulcer dyspepsia?

Authors:  R Bost; J Hostein; M Valenti; B Bonaz; N Payen; H Faure; J Fournet
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.