Literature DB >> 2302976

Is there an abnormal fasting duodenogastric reflux in nonulcer dyspepsia?

R Bost1, J Hostein, M Valenti, B Bonaz, N Payen, H Faure, J Fournet.   

Abstract

A quantitatively and/or qualitatively abnormal duodenogastric reflux (DGR) could be involved in the pathogenesis of nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD). The aims of this prospective study were to look for (1) a pathological DGR profile during fasting and (2) an eventual correlation between DGR profile and clinical symptoms. Twenty-six NUD patients were investigated. Seven other operated patients with a surgical procedure facilitating DGR episodes and 27 healthy volunteers served as control groups. A clinical score was determined for each patient from a standardized questionnaire. Gastric aspiration was performed for 6 hr in fasting subjects. The aspirates were pooled into 17 samples. In each sample the concentration and the output of total bile acids was determined. If the concentration was larger than 30 mumol/liter in pooled samples, the concentrations of free bile acids and the distribution of the conjugated bile acids was determined. The percentage of aliquots with a total bile acid concentration larger than 50 mumol/liter (without upper limit), and the percentage with a concentration larger than 2500 mumol/liter was also obtained. No significant difference was demonstrated between the healthy volunteers and NUD patients, whatever the parameter considered. However, there was a significant increase in each of the quantitative parameters for the group of operated patients in comparison with the NUD patient group. No significant correlation was found between the clinical score and the DGR profile in NUD patients. Apparently, DGR episodes do not play a primary role in the pathogenesis of NUD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2302976     DOI: 10.1007/bf01536762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  37 in total

1.  The secretory component of the interdigestive migrating motor complex in man.

Authors:  G R Vantrappen; T L Peeters; J Janssens
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  New clinical method for measuring the rate of gastric emptying: the double sampling test meal.

Authors:  J D George
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Pyloric function and gall-stone dyspepsia.

Authors:  A G Johnson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Thin-layer chromatographic separation of chenodeoxycholic and deoxycholic acids.

Authors:  G S Sundaram; H Singh; H S Sodhi
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal manifestations of collagen diseases.

Authors:  J Hostein; J Fournet
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.404

Review 6.  Dyspepsia: a dilemma for doctors?

Authors:  R V Heatley; B J Rathbone
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Measuring gastric volume by dye dilution.

Authors:  A Hurwitz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The interdigestive motor complex of normal subjects and patients with bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; J Hellemans; Y Ghoos
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Bile acid output and the interdigestive migrating motor complex in normals and in cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  T L Peeters; G Vantrappen; J Janssens
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Duodenogastric reflux: correlations among bile acid pattern, mucus secretion, and mucosal damage.

Authors:  E Masci; P A Testoni; L Fanti; M Guslandi; M Zuin; A Tittobello
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Kenichiro Fukuhara; Harushi Osugi; Nobuyasu Takada; Masashi Takemura; Masayuki Higashino; Hiroaki Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Intragastric pH monitoring is unsuitable for diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  J Hostein; R Bost
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Controversy surrounding 'mini' gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; William R J Carr; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Fiberoptic technique for 24-hour bile reflux monitoring. Standards and normal values for gastric monitoring.

Authors:  M Fein; K H Fuchs; T Bohrer; S M Freys; A Thiede
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Nocturnal antral pH rises are related to duodenal phase III retroperistalsis.

Authors:  E S Björnsson; H Abrahamsson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Scintigraphic study of gallbladder emptying and duodenogastric reflux during non-ulcerous dyspepsia.

Authors:  J P Caravel; B Bonaz; J Hostein; R Bost; J Fournet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

7.  Duodenogastric bile reflux and gastrointestinal motility in pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. Role of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F Mearin; X De Ribot; A Balboa; M Antolín; M J Varas; J R Malagelada
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Gastric bilirubin monitoring to assess duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  Martin Fein; Stephan M Freys; Marco Sailer; Jörn Maroske; Harald Tigges; Karl-Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.