| Literature DB >> 35822039 |
Shao-Yun Yang1,2, Hsuei-Chen Lee1,2, Chih-Mao Huang3,4, Jin-Jong Chen1,2,5.
Abstract
Early prevention from accelerated neurocognitive declines with advanced aging and the delay of the onset of dementia have became paramount for the achievement of active aging. The present study examined whether the proposed non-pharmaceutical, multi-component exercise training which combined Tai-Chi exercise, Aerobic fitness, and thera-band therapy protects against age-related neurocognitive and physical deterioration in the older participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Participants with aMCI in the quasi-experimental design were assigned to the multi-component exercise group or care control group. Evaluations of neuropsychological function and functional fitness were performed before and after 12-weeks intervention, and after 24-weeks follow-up. Our results showed that the multi-component intervention significantly improved various domains of neurocognitive function, particularly in memory- and frontal-related cognition, and better performance on functional fitness, including muscle strength, cardiopulmonary endurance, and agility. Furthermore, such beneficial effects were preserved after 24 weeks. The findings provide supportive evidence that non-pharmaceutically multi-component intervention with Tai-Chi style practice as a core exercise may protect against age-related neurocognitive and physical deficits and lay the path on developing age-friendly intervention programs to delay, or even reverse, the progression of MCI to dementia.Entities:
Keywords: Tai-Chi exercise; amnestic MCI; functional fitness; multi-components exercise; neurocognitive function
Year: 2021 PMID: 35822039 PMCID: PMC9261301 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2021.636390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging ISSN: 2673-6217
FIGURE 1The outline of the participants flow from first contact to study completion.
Participants’ detail demographic characteristics at baseline (Mean ± SD).
| Characteristic | Group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEG | CCG | ||
| N (Male/Female) | 19 (3/16) | 17 (7/10) | 0.139 |
| Age | 83.1 ± 5.7 | 82.0 ± 5.5 | 0.564 |
| Education | 7.6 ± 4.3 | 8.4 ± 5.7 | 0.603 |
| Cognitive Function | |||
| MoCA-TS | 19.3 ± 2.8 | 20.5 ± 2.7 | 0.201 |
| MoCA-MIS | 9.0 ± 2.9 | 9.5 ± 3.4 | 0.584 |
| MMSE | 25.1 ± 1.4 | 25.4 ± 1.3 | 0.591 |
| CCVLT | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 0.13 |
| GDS | 4.1 ± 4.1 | 5.4 ± 3.8 | 0.339 |
| Memory-immediately | 13.1 ± 6.5 | 16.9 ± 5.6 | 0.073 |
| Memory-imm-top | 3.1 ± 1.6 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 0.083 |
| Memory-delay | 3.5 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 2.4 | 0.054 |
| Memory-delay-top | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 0.116 |
| Memory-retention | 52.7 ± 27.0 | 69.2 ± 24.9 | 0.066 |
| Memory-recognition | 17.7 ± 2.7 | 19.5 ± 2.7 | 0.053 |
| Spatial-F | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 5.6 ± 1.6 | 0.5 |
| Spatial-B | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 0.14 |
| Digit-F | 10.6 ± 2.0 | 10.7 ± 1.7 | 0.907 |
| Digit-B | 3.7 ± 1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 0.266 |
| Visual reproduction-TS | 39.6 ± 13.8 | 43.3 ± 17.1 | 0.483 |
| Verbal-N | 10.2 ± 2.4 | 11.8 ± 3.9 | 0.146 |
| Verbal-R | 1.1 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | 0.725 |
| TMT-A-sec | 28.8 ± 18.5 | 26.5 ± 13.1 | 0.674 |
| TMT-B-sec | 87.7 ± 18.2 | 73.9 ± 34.5 | 0.137 |
| Functional Fitness | |||
| Grip-RT | 20.1 ± 7.2 | 22.6 ± 5.4 | 0.256 |
| Grip-LT | 18.8 ± 7.3 | 20.9 ± 5.0 | 0.336 |
| 6 m-Walk-Usual | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.336 |
| 6 m-Walk-Fastest | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.336 |
| 30 s-stand-sit | 12.7 ± 5.7 | 15.7 ± 4.7 | 0.108 |
| 30 s-arm curl | 13.5 ± 4.5 | 13.8 ± 4.7 | 0.818 |
| OLS-RT | 5.3 ± 3.8 | 3.6 ± 3.9 | 0.197 |
| OLS-LT | 5.8 ± 4.3 | 3.9 ± 2.3 | 0.123 |
| 8 ft TUG | 9.9 ± 3.3 | 9.4 ± 3.3 | 0.629 |
| 2 min step | 67.0 ± 19.9 | 63.2 ± 14.8 | 0.53 |
MEG, multi-component exercise group; CCG, care control group; MoCA-TS, montreal cognitive assessment- total score; MoCA-MIS, montreal cognitive assessment- memory index score; MMSE, mini-metal state examination; CCVLT, Chinese California verbal learning test; GDS, geriatric depression scale; logical-immediately, logical memory-immediately recall; Logical-imm-top, logical memory-immediately-top score; Logical-delay, logical memory-delay recall; Spatial-F, spatial-forward; Spatial-B, spatial-backward; Digit-F, digit-forward; Digit-B, digit-backward; Visual reproduction-TS, visual reproduction-total score; Verbal-N, verbal-animal-number; Verbal-animal-R, verbal-animal-repeated; OLS-RT and LT, one leg stand- right and left; ft TUG, 8 feet time up and go test.
FIGURE 2The effects of Tai Chi-style multi-component exercise intervention on cognitive function. The results of cognitive functions revealed significant groups (MEG and CCG) by time (pre-test, post-test and follow up-test) interactions on (A) Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Taiwan version (MoCA-T), (B) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), (C) Chinese California Verbal Learning Test (CCVLT), (D) Immediate Recall of Logic Memory (Memory-Immediate), (E) Delayed Recall of Logic Memory (Memory-Delayed), (F) Retention of Logic Memory (Memory-Retention), (G) Recognition of Logic Memory (Memory-Recognition), (H) Verbal Fluency-number of naming items (VF-N), (I) Trail Making Test-A (TMT-A), and (J) Trail Making Test (TMT-B).
Intervention effects on cognitive function (Mean ± SD).
| Cognitive Function | Pre-tests | Post-tests | Follow up-test | Group by Time interactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEG | CCG | MEG | CCG | MEG | CCG |
| |
| MoCA-TS | 19.3 ± 2.8a** | 20.5 ± 2.7 | 21.8 ± 3.1 | 20.1 ± 4.1 | 21.1 ± 3.9b* | 19.0 ± 4.5 | 0.014* |
| MoCA-MIS | 9.0 ± 2.9 | 9.5 ± 3.4 | 9.7 ± 2.7 | 10.0 ± 3.1 | 9.7 ± 2.8 | 7.9 ± 3.6 | 0.088 |
| MMSE | 25.1 ± 1.4a** | 25.4 ± 1.3 | 26.5 ± 1.8 | 25.2 ± 2.8c** | 26.1 ± 2.4 | 22.7 ± 3.6b** | <0.001*** |
| CCVLT | 4.7 ± 1.3a** | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 1.5 | 3.0 ± 2.5 | 5.7 ± 1.8b* | 3.1 ± 2.5 | 0.005** |
| GDS | 4.1 ± 4.1a* | 5.4 ± 3.8 | 1.7 ± 4.88 | 4.3 ± 5.5 | 3.0 ± 3.2 | 2.8 ± 2.8b** | 022* |
| Memory-immediately | 13.1 ± 6.5a*** | 16.9 ± 5.6 | 18.9 ± 9.0 | 15.8 ± 7.1c* | 16.9 ± 7.0b* | 12.5 ± 6.1b*** | <0.001*** |
| Memory-imm-top | 3.1 ± 1.6a*** | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 1.4c* | 3.8 ± 1.4c* | 4.1 ± 1.5b** | 3.1 ± 1.4b* | <0.001*** |
| Memory-delay | 3.5 ± 2.1a*** | 5.0 ± 2.4 | 6.1 ± 3.5 | 4.9 ± 2.4c** | 5.6 ± 2.7b*** | 3.2 ± 2.7b** | <0.001*** |
| Memory-delay-top | 2.1 ± 1.4a*** | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 3.7 ± 1.9 | 3.4 ± 1.5c* | 3.7 ± 1.9b*** | 2.3 ± 2.0 | <0.001*** |
| Memory-retention | 52.7 ± 27.0a** | 69.2 ± 24.9 | 71.4 ± 28.5 | 75.9 ± 19.5c** | 72.8 ± 24.2b** | 52.1 ± 35.5b* | <0.001*** |
| Memory-recognition | 17.7 ± 2.7a** | 19.5 ± 2.7 | 19.8 ± 3.3 | 18.6 ± 2.7c** | 18.8 ± 2.7b* | 18.7 ± 1.8b* | 0.004** |
| Spatial-F | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 5.6 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 1.8 | 5.2 ± 1.2 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 0.139 |
| Spatial-B | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 0.516 |
| Digit-F | 10.6 ± 2.0 | 10.7 ± 1.7 | 11.2 ± 2.7 | 10.7 ± 2.4 | 11.6 ± 2.4b** | 10.4 ± 2.5 | 0.414 |
| Digit-B | 3.7 ± 1.2a** | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 4.2 ± 1.5 | 4.0 ± 1.3 | 0.104 |
| Visual reproduction-TS | 39.6 ± 13.8a** | 43.3 ± 17.1 | 47.8 ± 17.4 | 45.0 ± 19.5 | 45.8 ± 14.8 | 51.0 ± 26.6 | 0.288 |
| Verbal-N | 9.8 ± 2.2a** | 10.5 ± 3.2 | 11.2 ± 2.7 | 10.4 ± 2.4 | 10.7 ± 2.3b** | 10.4 ± 3.8 | 0.04* |
| Verbal-R | 1.5 ± 1.4a* | 1.1 ± 1.3 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 1.6 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 1.0 ± 3.8 | 0.006** |
| TMT-A-sec | 28.8 ± 18.5a* | 26.5 ± 13.1 | 21.2 ± 9.4 | 28.6 ± 13.4c** | 25.9 ± 15.6 | 48.6 ± 38.7b* | 0.003** |
| TMT-B-sec | 87.7 ± 18.2a** | 73.9 ± 34.5 | 66.6 ± 27.0 | 77.2 ± 32.6c* | 72.4 ± 31.5b* | 89.0 ± 35.1b* | 0.001** |
p < 0.5a*, p < 0.01a**, p < 0.001a*** compared between pre-test and post-test within group.
p < 0.5b*, p < 0.01b**, p < 0.001b*** compared between pre-test and follow up-test within group.
p < 0.5c*, p < 0.01c**, p < 0.001c*** compared between post-test and follow up-test within group.
FIGURE 3The effects of Tai Chi-style multi-component exercise intervention on functional fitness. The results of physical functional fitness revealed significant groups (MEG and CCG) by time (pre-test, post-test and follow up-test) interactions on (A) Walking Speed-Usual Pace test (m/s), (B) Walking Speed-Fastest Pace test (m/s), (C) 30 s stand and Sit test (30 s Stand-Sit), and (D) 2 min Steps test (2 min Steps).
Intervention effects on Functional Fitness (Mean±SD)
| Functional Fitness | Pre-tests | Post-tests | Follow up-test | Group by Time interactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEG | CCG | MEG | CCG | MEG | CCG |
| |
| Gript-RT | 20.1 ± 7.2 | 22.6 ± 5.4 | 19.6 ± 6.5 | 22.1 ± 6.7 | 19.6 ± 5.5 | 20.2 ± 4.9b** | 0.106 |
| Grip-LT | 18.8 ± 7.3 | 20.9 ± 5.0 | 18.1 ± 5.8 | 20.6 ± 5.3c* | 18.2 ± 5.8 | 18.9 ± 4.2b** | 0.059 |
| Walk Speed-usual pace (m/s) | 0.8 ± 0.2a* | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1c*** | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.033* |
| Walk Speed-fastest pace (m/s) | 1.1 ± 0.2a** | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2c** | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 1.2b* | 0.006** |
| 30 s-stand-sit | 12.7 ± 5.7 | 15.7 ± 4.7a* | 13.5 ± 4.5 | 12.7 ± 5.1 | 13.0 ± 6.6 | 11.1 ± 5.3b** | 0.019 |
| 30 s-arm curl | 13.5 ± 4.5a** | 13.8 ± 4.7 | 15.5 ± 3.3 | 15.9 ± 3.0 | 15.7 ± 4.8b** | 14.3 ± 4.8 | 0.352 |
| One leg stand- RT | 5.3 ± 3.8 | 3.6 ± 3.9 | 8.9 ± 8.2c** | 4.1 ± 3.7 | 5.5 ± 7.0 | 3.2 ± 4.1 | 0.167 |
| One leg stand- LT | 5.8 ± 4.3 | 3.9 ± 2.3a* | 7.5 ± 5.2 | 2.8 ± 2.8 | 5.9 ± 6.5 | 3.2 ± 4.7 | 0.111 |
| 8 ft TUG | 9.9 ± 3.3a*** | 9.4 ± 3.3 | 8.4 ± 2.4 | 9.4 ± 2.6c** | 9.6 ± 5.1 | 11.2 ± 3.7b* | 0.162 |
| 2 min steps | 67.0 ± 19.9a* | 63.2 ± 14.8 | 77.6 ± 17.7 | 70.1 ± 24.4c** | 78.1 ± 23.2b* | 52.8 ± 16.8b* | 0.002** |
p < 0.5a*, p < 0.01a**, p < 0.001a*** compared between pre-test and post-test within group.
p < 0.5b*, p < 0.01b**, p < 0.001b*** compared between pre-test and follow up-test within group.
p < 0.5c*, p < 0.01c**, p < 0.001c*** compared between post-test and follow up-test within group.