Literature DB >> 35821873

Ethical foundations for graduate students in the psychological sciences.

Julia Bravin1, Jessica Carrasco1, Michael Kalichman2.   

Abstract

Preparation to address ethical challenges is an essential component of graduate training, and no less so for the psychological sciences. However, in the absence of uniform guidelines, approaches to training vary in form and quality. Classroom lectures and online training seem to be the mechanisms of choice, but these fall short. First, such approaches conflict with the scholarship on teaching and learning that makes it clear that having a meaningful impact depends on having students actively engaged in constructing their own learning. Second, research is consistent with intuition that the impact of courses is likely to be far less than what happens in a graduate student's research environment. The conclusion is that promoting an ethical culture, and for the training of graduate students in particular, will be well served by enhancing the role of mentors. Examples of options to consider are: (1) recognizing that a primary advisor can be a mentor, but should certainly not be considered the only mentor; (2) emphasizing the importance of mentoring for individuals from underrepresented groups (e.g., because of gender or ethnicity); (3) strengthening the APA code of ethics to more fully articulate the full range and importance of mentoring; (4) developing and implementing mechanisms to evaluate and reward effective mentoring; and (5) providing targeted training for faculty advisors to empower them with tools and resources to be effective mentors for ethics generally and the responsible conduct of research specifically.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graduate students; Mentors; Research ethics; Responsible conduct of research; Teaching and learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 35821873      PMCID: PMC9273059          DOI: 10.1037/tps0000269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Issues Psychol Sci


  27 in total

1.  Use and abuse of the internet for teaching research ethics--commentary on "Misconceptions and realities about teaching online".

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Aaron S Horn; Kelly R Risbey; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD students.

Authors:  Allison A Lewinski; Tara Mann; Dalmacio Flores; Ashlee Vance; Janet Prvu Bettger; Rachel Hirschey
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Lindsay G Feldman
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-11-01

6.  How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; David Shaw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among doctoral students: the mediating effect of mentoring relationships on the association between research self-efficacy and depression/anxiety.

Authors:  Chunli Liu; Lie Wang; Ruiqun Qi; Weiqiu Wang; Shanshan Jia; Deshu Shang; Yangguang Shao; Min Yu; Xinwang Zhu; Shengnan Yan; Qing Chang; Yuhong Zhao
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2019-03-21

8.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.