| Literature DB >> 35821029 |
Andrew P Blaber1,2, Kouhyar Tavakolian3,4, Bradley Hoffmann1, Parastoo Dehkordi5, Farzad Khosrow-Khavar5, Nandu Goswami6.
Abstract
During head-down tilt bed rest (HDT) the cardiovascular system is subject to headward fluid shifts. The fluid shift phenomenon is analogous to weightlessness experienced during spaceflight microgravity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prolonged 60-day bed rest on the mechanical performance of the heart using the morphology of seismocardiography (SCG). Three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), SCG and blood pressure recordings were collected simultaneously from 20 males in a 60-day HDT study (MEDES, Toulouse, France). The study was divided into two campaigns of ten participants. The first commenced in January, and the second in September. Signals were recorded in the supine position during the baseline data collection (BDC) before bed rest, during 6° HDT bed rest and during recovery (R), post-bed rest. Using SCG and blood pressure at the finger, the following were determined: Pulse Transit Time (PTT); and left-ventricular ejection time (LVET). SCG morphology was analyzed using functional data analysis (FDA). The coefficients of the model were estimated over 20 cycles of SCG recordings of BDC12 and HDT52. SCG fiducial morphology AO (aortic valve opening) and AC (aortic valve closing) amplitudes showed significant decrease between BDC12 and HDT52 (p < 0.03). PTT and LVET were also found to decrease through HDT bed rest (p < 0.01). Furthermore, PTT and LVET magnitude of response to bed rest was found to be different between campaigns (p < 0.001) possibly due to seasonal effects on of the cardiovascular system. Correlations between FDA and cardiac timing intervals PTT and LVET using SCG suggests decreases in mechanical strength of the heart and increased arterial stiffness due to fluid shifts associated with the prolonged bed rest.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35821029 PMCID: PMC9276739 DOI: 10.1038/s41526-022-00206-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NPJ Microgravity ISSN: 2373-8065 Impact factor: 4.970
Fig. 1HDT schematic of sensor placement.
SCG (yellow rectangle) placed on the xiphoid process. Blood pressure measured at the finger (orange rectangle). ECG Lead II shown RA lead (gray circle) on right clavicle, RL lead (dark blue circle) on lower right rib cage and LL (light blue circle) on lower left rib cage.
Fig. 2Blood pressure and seismocardiogram waveforms with annotations.
Pulse Transit Time (PTT) is the time interval between the aortic valve opening (AO) peak of SCG and RP (Foot) of BP. LVET is the time interval between the AO and AC peak of the SCG.
Fig. 3FDA analysis of SCG signals containing AO and AC basis function coefficient sets pre- and post-HDT.
Average AO and AC peak decrease over 20 cardiac cycles after 52 days head-down tilt bed rest compared to pre-HDT. Morphology spline coefficient sets corresponding to the AO (sets 4, 5 and 6) and AC (sets 14, 15, and 16) peak complexes show distributions from pre-HDT to day 52 HDT furthering the peak changes. Coefficient sets define the spline basis functions shown to describe the SCG signal morphology. Boxes represent ±1 interquartile range, whiskers represent ± 1.5 interquartile range and center lines are medians.
Cardiovascular function and timing intervals through the three phases of bed rest.
| Variable | BDC12 | HDT01 | HDT 29 | HDT52 | R8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | Campaign 1 | Campaign 2 | |
| HR (bpm) | 55 ± 4 | 64 ± 8† | 59 ± 11 | 55 ± 10 | 61 ± 13* | 63 ± 9* | 66 ± 15* | 67 ± 11* | 71 ± 14* | 67 ± 7*† |
| RR (ms) | 917 ± 67 | 1067 ± 133† | 983 ± 183 | 917 ± 167 | 1017 ± 217* | 1050 ± 150* | 1100 ± 250* | 1117 ± 183* | 1183 ± 233* | 1117 ± 117*† |
| SBP(mmHg) | 118 ± 13 | 125 ± 21† | 104 ± 11* | 120 ± 15*† | 123 ± 15 | 132 ± 18† | 113 ± 15 | 128 ± 19† | 116 ± 11 | 129 ± 21† |
| DBP (mmHg) | 63 ± 8 | 65 ± 7 | 54 ± 8* | 59 ± 7* | 66 ± 9 | 71 ± 12 | 64 ± 8 | 71 ± 12 | 62 ± 5 | 70 ± 13 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 83 ± 10 | 85 ± 12 | 71 ± 9 | 79 ± 10 | 85 ± 10 | 91 ± 13 | 80 ± 9 | 90 ± 14 | 80 ± 7 | 90 ± 15 |
| PTT (ms) | 189 ± 29 | 209 ± 38† | 123 ± 40* | 182 ± 60*† | 106 ± 29* | 208 ± 31† | 110 ± 26* | 205 ± 36† | 113 ± 17* | 179 ± 45*† |
| LVET(ms) | 337 ± 28 | 308 ± 35 | 344 ± 49* | 340 ± 21* | 320 ± 38 | 312 ± 20 | 308 ± 34* | 300 ± 20* | 310 ± 23* | 313 ± 15* |
Campaign groups were paired comparing HDBR phases to baseline BDC12. Further unpaired analysis was done to compare Campaign 1 and Campaign 2. Cardiovascular timing intervals were Values are split based on phase and further split based on campaign season. Campaign 1 coincides with the first season started in January and Campaign 2 coincides with the second season started in September. * Denotes significant differences compared to BDC12 and † denotes significance between campaigns at each test day (Two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).