PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 70-day Bed Rest Study. The integrated complement of investigations and the standardized bed rest environment that served as the platform for this study complement are described. Outcomes of the studies will not be presented here but will be reported in separate publications. METHODS: A set of studies running in an integrated fashion along the entire period (pre-, in-, and post-bed rest) and using the same subjects is referred in this article as "the campaign" or "complement." NASA selected eight individual studies to participate in the 70-d bed rest campaign. These studies were integrated to increase efficiency in the utilization of resources and to share common measures among the investigations. In addition to the individual studies addressing specific aims, a battery of standardized measures was included. Standard measures target a wide range of physiologic systems and represent some of the testing routinely done on astronauts. Bed rest subjects underwent rigorous medical and psychological screening. Standardized conditions included 70 d of bed rest in a 6° head-down tilt position. Subjects' vital signs, body weight, and fluid intake and output were measured daily. A standardized diet was provided to ensure consistent nutritional intake across subjects. Exercising subjects were prescribed individualized aerobic and resistance training 6 d·wk performed in a horizontal body position. Subjects in the testosterone supplementation countermeasure group received testosterone enanthate injections at 2-wk intervals during bed rest. CONCLUSION: Long-duration head-down tilt bed rest provided a suitable platform for examining physiologic effects of spaceflight and testing countermeasures in a ground-based model. Integrating studies into a complement is an effective way to support multiple investigations while minimizing the number of subjects to answer many research questions.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 70-day Bed Rest Study. The integrated complement of investigations and the standardized bed rest environment that served as the platform for this study complement are described. Outcomes of the studies will not be presented here but will be reported in separate publications. METHODS: A set of studies running in an integrated fashion along the entire period (pre-, in-, and post-bed rest) and using the same subjects is referred in this article as "the campaign" or "complement." NASA selected eight individual studies to participate in the 70-d bed rest campaign. These studies were integrated to increase efficiency in the utilization of resources and to share common measures among the investigations. In addition to the individual studies addressing specific aims, a battery of standardized measures was included. Standard measures target a wide range of physiologic systems and represent some of the testing routinely done on astronauts. Bed rest subjects underwent rigorous medical and psychological screening. Standardized conditions included 70 d of bed rest in a 6° head-down tilt position. Subjects' vital signs, body weight, and fluid intake and output were measured daily. A standardized diet was provided to ensure consistent nutritional intake across subjects. Exercising subjects were prescribed individualized aerobic and resistance training 6 d·wk performed in a horizontal body position. Subjects in the testosterone supplementation countermeasure group received testosterone enanthate injections at 2-wk intervals during bed rest. CONCLUSION: Long-duration head-down tilt bed rest provided a suitable platform for examining physiologic effects of spaceflight and testing countermeasures in a ground-based model. Integrating studies into a complement is an effective way to support multiple investigations while minimizing the number of subjects to answer many research questions.
Authors: Meghan E Downs; Jessica M Scott; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Elizabeth Goetchius; Roxanne E Buxton; Christopher P Danesi; Kathleen M Randolph; Randall J Urban; Melinda Sheffield-Moore; E Lichar Dillon Journal: Life Sci Space Res (Amst) Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: E Lichar Dillon; Melinda Sheffield-Moore; William J Durham; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Jeffrey W Ryder; Christopher P Danesi; Kathleen M Randolph; Charles R Gilkison; Randall J Urban Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jessica M Scott; Wesley J Tucker; David Martin; James B Crowell; Elizabeth Goetchius; Omar Ozgur; Scott Hamilton; Christian Otto; Rebecca Gonzales; Monica Ritter; Nathanial Newby; John DeWitt; Michael B Stenger; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Lori Ploutz-Snyder; William H Morgan; Mark J Haykowsky Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jessica M Scott; Meghan Downs; Roxanne Buxton; Elizabeth Goetchius; Brent Crowell; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Kyle J Hackney; Jeffrey Ryder; Kirk English; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2020-11-24
Authors: Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Brian T Peters; Chris A Miller; Igor S Kofman; Millard F Reschke; Laura C Taylor; Emily L Lawrence; Scott J Wood; Steven S Laurie; Stuart M C Lee; Roxanne E Buxton; Tiffany R May-Phillips; Michael B Stenger; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Jeffrey W Ryder; Alan H Feiveson; Jacob J Bloomberg Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: E Lichar Dillon; Kizhake V Soman; John E Wiktorowicz; Ria Sur; Daniel Jupiter; Christopher P Danesi; Kathleen M Randolph; Charles R Gilkison; William J Durham; Randall J Urban; Melinda Sheffield-Moore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vincent Koppelmans; Jessica M Scott; Meghan E Downs; Kaitlin E Cassady; Peng Yuan; Ofer Pasternak; Scott J Wood; Yiri E De Dios; Nichole E Gadd; Igor Kofman; Roy Riascos; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Rachael D Seidler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ronni Baran; Shannon Marchal; Sebastian Garcia Campos; Emil Rehnberg; Kevin Tabury; Bjorn Baselet; Markus Wehland; Daniela Grimm; Sarah Baatout Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-12-28