Literature DB >> 35817584

Factors predicting amoxicillin prescribing in primary care among children: a cohort study.

Faith Miller1, Ania Zylbersztejn2, Graziella Favarato2, Imad Adamestam3, Lucy Pembrey4, Laura Shallcross5, Dan Mason6, John Wright6, Pia Hardelid2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prescribing during childhood, most commonly for respiratory tract infections (RTIs), contributes to antimicrobial resistance, which is a major public health concern. AIM: To identify factors associated with amoxicillin prescribing and RTI consultation attendance in young children in primary care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cohort study in Bradford spanning pregnancy to age 24 months, collected 2007-2013, linked to electronic primary care and air pollution data.
METHOD: Amoxicillin prescribing and RTI consultation rates/1000 child-years were calculated. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were fitted with general practice (GP) surgery as the random effect.
RESULTS: The amoxicillin prescribing rate among 2493 children was 710/1000 child-years during year 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 677 to 744) and 780/1000 (95% CI = 745 to 816) during year 2. During year 1, odds of amoxicillin prescribing were higher for boys (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.36, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.61), infants from socioeconomically deprived households (aOR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.86), and infants with a Pakistani ethnic background (with mothers born in the UK [aOR 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.94] and outside [aOR 1.42, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.90]). During year 2, odds of amoxicillin prescribing were higher for infants with a Pakistani ethnic background (with mothers born in the UK [aOR 1.46, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.94] and outside [aOR 1.56, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.04]) and those born <39 weeks gestation (aOR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.45). Additional risk factors included caesarean delivery, congenital anomalies, overcrowding, birth season, and childcare attendance, with GP surgery explaining 7%-9% of variation.
CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic status and ethnic background were associated with amoxicillin prescribing during childhood. Efforts to reduce RTI spread in household and childcare settings may reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
© The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-bacterial agents; drug prescriptions; drug resistance; medical record linkage; paediatrics; respiratory tract infections

Year:  2022        PMID: 35817584      PMCID: PMC9282803          DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   6.302


INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a public health emergency, to which prescribing of antibiotics contributes.[1] In the UK most antibiotics are prescribed in primary care.[2],[3] Several studies have found that patient-level factors including gender, flu vaccination status, obesity, smoking, previous antibiotic receipt, and comorbidities increase antibiotic prescribing among adults.[4],[5] Prescribing rates also vary geographically according to area-level deprivation and the proportion of patients with comorbidities.[6],[7] Few studies have examined antibiotic use among children, despite a third of children aged <5 years being prescribed at least one antibiotic annually.[3] Childhood antibiotic prescribing in the UK peaks between the ages of 1 and 4 years, and three-quarters of antibiotics prescribed to children in primary care are for respiratory tract infections (RTIs).[8],[9] Furthermore, antibiotic prescribing in childhood is linked with adverse health outcomes in later childhood, including asthma and obesity.[10],[11] The severity of presenting illness determines the likelihood of being prescribed an antibiotic for common childhood infections.[9] Therefore, the authors expect antibiotic prescribing rates among children to differ according to the factors that increase the risk of contracting common infections, including overcrowding and having older siblings,[12],[13] and factors that reduce the immune system’s ability to fight infections if exposed, such as prematurity, exposure to air pollution, and lack of breastfeeding.[14]–[16] Furthermore, qualitative studies suggest parent–clinician communication may have an impact on childhood antibiotic prescribing.[17] However, few studies have examined risk factors for antibiotic prescribing among children. This study set out to establish child, family, and environmental factors that were associated with prescribing of amoxicillin to children aged <2 years, to inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts among children. In order to examine the importance of individual and primary care-level factors, the proportion of total variation in amoxicillin prescribing attributed to GP surgery-level variation was calculated. This study focused on amoxicillin because it is the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in UK primary care.[8],[9] As amoxicillin is most commonly prescribed for RTIs, the risk factors associated with primary care consultation rates for RTIs were also examined.

METHOD

Data sources

Data from the Allergy and Infection (ALL-IN) substudy of the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort was used in this study. ALL-IN and BiB have been described in detail elsewhere.[18],[19] Briefly, pregnant women attending the Bradford Royal Infirmary for an oral glucose tolerance test (offered to all women booked for delivery at the Bradford Royal Infirmary at 26–28 weeks of pregnancy) between March 2007 and November 2010 were invited to participate in BiB. Parents completed baseline questionnaires, and details about the birth were extracted from hospital electronic maternity records. Details of congenital anomalies were obtained from a local register linked to the cohort.[20] Linkage to routinely collected electronic primary care data facilitated follow-up.[18] How this fits in Children born from March 2008 whose parents had completed the BiB baseline questionnaires were invited to participate in the ALL-IN subcohort when aged 11 months.[19] Families who agreed to participate in ALL-IN completed questionnaires at ages 12 and 24 months (completed February 2009 to September 2013). The study used openly available data on annual average levels of fine particulate matter (≤2.5 µm, PM2.5) modelled at a 1 × 1 km grid across the UK using atmospheric transport models, from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. PM2.5 levels were mapped to lower super output areas (LSOA, a small geographical area with an average population of 1500 people) and linked to the cohort via LSOA of the infant’s home address.[21]–[23]

Outcome variables

The primary outcome was the receipt of at least one amoxicillin prescription in primary care during the first and second year of life (see Supplementary Table S1).[23] The secondary outcomes were at least one primary care consultation for upper RTIs (URTIs) or lower RTIs (LRTIs). Diagnostic information from electronic primary care records were recorded using Read codes version 3 (CTV3; see Supplementary Table S2).[24]–[26]

Exposure variables

Table 1 summarises the source and characteristics of all outcome and exposure variables. Gestational age was coded as a binary variable for being born preterm/early-term (<39 weeks) or term (≥39 weeks). Initially 37 weeks was used to define a variable for preterm/term, however, the number of infants born <37 weeks was low (n = 112/2493, 4.5%). The five-category variable defining socioeconomic status had previously been derived from the BiB baseline questionnaire.[27] Information on whether the child had spent any time in formal childcare (for example, at a nursery or with a childminder), lived in a household with ≥6 people, or had exposure to indoor household pollutants (such as mould/damp or gas cookers) was collected via parental questionnaires.
Table 1.

Source and characteristics of each variable included in the analysis

Variable Source Type Coding
Primary outcome
GP amoxicillin prescribingElectronic primary care recordsBinary≥1 prescription each year: yes/no

Secondary outcome
GP consultation for URTIElectronic primary care recordsBinary≥1 consultation each year: yes/no
GP consultation for LRTIElectronic primary care recordsBinary≥1 consultation each year: yes/no

Exposure
Sex of infantMaternity recordsBinaryMale
Female
Delivery modeMaternity recordsBinaryVaginal
Caesarean
Quarter of birthMaternity recordsCategoricalJanuary–March
April–June
July–September
October–December
Gestational ageMaternity recordsBinary<39 weeks
≥39 weeks
Congenital anomaliesCongenital anomaly register at Bradford Royal InfirmaryBinary0 congenital anomalies
≥1 congenital anomaly
Ethnic backgroundBiB baseline questionnaireCategoricalWhite British
Pakistani, UK-born
Pakistan, non-UK born
Other
Socioeconomic statusBiB baseline questionnaireCategoricalLeast deprived and most educated
Employed not materially deprived
Employed with no access to money
On benefits but coping
Most deprived
Maternal smoking during pregnancyBiB baseline questionnaireBinarySmoked during pregnancy: yes/no
Breastfeeding durationALL-IN 12-month questionnaireCategorical<1 month
1–<6 months
≥6 months
ChildcareALL-IN 12-month and 24-month questionnairesBinaryChild in formal childcare: yes/no
Number of people in householdALL-IN 12-month and 24-month questionnairesBinaryChild in overcrowded (6 people) dwelling: yes/no
Household mould/dampALL-IN 12-month and 24-month questionnairesBinaryChild in dwelling with visible mould/damp: yes/no
Gas cookingALL-IN 12-month and 24-month questionnairesCategoricalGas cooking only
Gas and electric cooking
Electric cooking only
Quartile of PM2.5 in relation to Bradford levelDepartment for Environment, Food andCategorical1st/2nd quartile
Rural Affairs linked with LSOA from BiB3rd quartile
baseline questionnaire and ALL-IN4th quartile
12-month questionnaire

ALL-IN = allergy and infection. BiB = Born in Bradford. LRTI = lower respiratory tract infection. LSOA = lower super output area. PM

Source and characteristics of each variable included in the analysis ALL-IN = allergy and infection. BiB = Born in Bradford. LRTI = lower respiratory tract infection. LSOA = lower super output area. PM The 1 × 1 km annual ambient PM2.5 levels were mapped to the LSOA of the child’s residence at birth and age 1 year. PM2.5 exposure during pregnancy was calculated using the average PM2.5 level in the calendar year(s) covering the gestation period, weighted by the number of days’ gestation during each calendar year. PM2.5 exposure during the first year of life was also weighted by the number of days spanning each calendar year. The authors calculated annual quartiles of average PM2.5 levels across the Bradford postcode area and derived two variables to indicate weighted PM2.5 exposures at the child’s LSOA, relative to the distribution of PM2.5 exposures in the Bradford area, throughout gestation and the first year of life. As few children lived in lower pollution areas, a three-category variable was created to indicate PM2.5 exposure during pregnancy and the first year of life: first/second quartile, third quartile, and fourth quartile of BD postcode area levels. Summary statistics for the absolute levels of PM2.5 exposure corresponding to each group can be found in Supplementary Table S3.

Statistical analyses

Amoxicillin prescribing rates, and rates of consultations for URTIs and LRTIs per 1000 child–years for the first and second years of life, overall and according to each exposure variable of interest were calculated. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare rates across exposures. Crude and mutually adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models (‘xtlogit’ function in Stata) were fitted to determine factors associated with receiving at least one amoxicillin prescription in the first and second years of life. GP surgery was included as the random intercept to determine surgery- and child-level variation in prescribing. For the small number of children who changed GP surgery during the year, they were assigned to the surgery they were registered with for longest. Based on a priori knowledge, all mutually adjusted models included ethnic background, socioeconomic status, and sex as core confounders. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, additional exposure variables were selected for inclusion if they improved model fit, determined using likelihood ratio tests (P-value <0.05). Likelihood ratio tests were conducted until no further variables improved model fit. Variables were dropped from the final model if they no longer improved fit in the fully adjusted model. Model fitting and selection procedures were repeated for having at least one URTI or LRTI consultation during the first and second years of life. In total, 491 participants did not attend the ALL-IN 24-month follow-up. Therefore, multiple imputation using chained (MICE; ‘mi’ function in Stata; 30 imputed datasets) was used to impute data for the 24-month follow-up.[28] The MICE model included all variables in the substantive model (including outcome variables), variables from the 12-month questionnaires, additional variables predictive of missingness, and GP surgery. To avoid perfect prediction, in which categorical outcomes are predicted almost perfectly resulting in instability during estimation, all GP surgeries with <10 participants were combined into one group (n = 68/2493, 2.7%). Models for the second year of life were undertaken with and without MICE as a sensitivity analysis. All analyses were undertaken in Stata (version 16.1).

RESULTS

The cohort included 2493 singleton children. In total, 2002 (80.3%) attended the 24-month follow-up (see Supplementary Figure S1). In total, 48.9% of all mothers had a Pakistani ethnic background (n = 1220/2493) and 43.7% were from the two most deprived socioeconomic groups (n = 1089/2493) (Table 2).
Table 2.

Summary of cohort characteristics, and amoxicillin prescribing rates

Baseline characteristic Cohort, n/N (%), (N= 2493) Amoxicillin prescribing rate/1000 child–years, rate (95% CI)

Year 1 Year 2
Total 710 (677 to 744)780 (745 to 816)

Sex of infant
Male1264/2481 (50.9)776 (728 to 827)823 (774 to 875)
Female1217/2481 (49.1)642 (597 to 689)735 (688 to 786)
Missing12/2493 (0.5)

Mother’s ethnic background
White British920/2491 (36.9)529 (483 to 579)638 (587 to 692)
Pakistani, UK born438/2491 (17.6)845 (760 to 936)900 (813 to 994)
Pakistani, not UK born782/2491 (31.4)969 (901 to 1042)935 (868 to 1006)
Other351/2491 (14.1)436 (369 to 512)659 (576 to 751)
Missing2/2493 (0.1)

Socioeconomic status
Least deprived and most educated507/2483 (20.4)608 (541 to 680)704 (632 to 782)
Employed not materially deprived443/2491 (17.8)505 (440 to 576)711 (632 to 795)
Employed with no access to money446/2485 (17.9)641 (568 to 720)786 (705 to 874)
On benefits but coping717/2485 (28.9)872 (805 to 944)881 (813 to 953)
Most deprived372/2485 (15.0)856 (763 to 956)776 (688 to 872)
Missing8/2493 (0.3)

Mother smoking during pregnancy
No2147/2491 (86.2)724 (688 to 761)796 (758 to 835)
Yes344/2491 (13.8)617 (536 to 706)682 (596 to 777)
Missing2/2493 (0.1)

Congenital anomalies
No2409/2493 (96.6)702 (669 to 737)763 (728 to 799)
Yes84/2493 (3.4)940 (743 to 1173)1270 (1039 to 1537)
Missing0/2493 (0.5)

Gestational age
Term/late-term1796/2481 (72.4)703 (665 to 744)749 (710 to 791)
Early/preterm685/2481 (27.6)729 (666 to 796)862 (793 to 935)
Missing12/2493 (0.5)

Quarter of birth
January–March643/2493 (25.8)696 (632 to 764)731 (665 to 801)
April–June601/2493 (24.1)833 (761 to 910)775 (706 to 850)
July–September608/2493 (24.4)694 (629 to 765)805 (735 to 880)
October–December641/2493 (25.7)624 (565 to 690)810 (741 to 883)
Missing0/2493 (0.0)

Delivery mode
Vaginal1964/2481 (79.2)693 (656 to 731)768 (729 to 808)
Caesarean517/2481 (20.8)778 (703 to 859)829 (751 to 912)
Missing12/2493 (0.5)

Breastfeeding duration, months
<11096/2482 (44.2)774 (723 to 829)841 (787 to 898)
1–<6598/2482 (24.1)706 (639 to 777)765 (696 to 839)
≥6788/2482 (31.7)622 (567 to 680)714 (656 to 776)
Missing11/2493 (0.4)

Amoxicillin prescribing rates per 1000 child–years during the first 2 years of life for the total cohort, and summarised according to exposure categories.

PM

Summary of cohort characteristics, and amoxicillin prescribing rates Amoxicillin prescribing rates per 1000 child–years during the first 2 years of life for the total cohort, and summarised according to exposure categories. PM

Amoxicillin prescribing

A total of 1594/2493 children (63.9%) received ≥1 amoxicillin prescription during the first 2 years of life; 42.5% (n = 1060/2493) during the first year, and 46.9% (n = 1169/2493) during the second year (see Supplementary Table S4). Prescribing rates were 710 (95% CI = 677 to 744) per 1000 child–years during their first year of life, and 780 (95% CI = 745 to 816) during the second year (Table 2). Table 3 displays the best-fitting model for amoxicillin prescribing during the first and second years of life. Compared with children of White British mothers, the odds of receiving at least one amoxicillin prescription during the first year of life were higher for children with mothers with a Pakistani ethnic background, regardless of their country of birth (UK-born Pakistani mothers: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.94; Pakistani mothers born outside UK: aOR 1.42, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.90) and lower for those with ‘other’ ethnic backgrounds (aOR 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.96). Infants from the most deprived households had higher odds of being prescribed amoxicillin (aOR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.86) compared with the least deprived.
Table 3.

Associations between exposures and amoxicillin prescribing during the first 2 years of life

Variable Amoxicillin prescribing, OR (95% CI)

Year 1 Year 2b

Crude Mutually adjusted (n= 2450) Crude Mutually adjusted (n= 2476)
Sex of infant
Male1.33 (1.13 to 1.58)1.36 (1.14 to 1.61)1.13 (0.96 to 1.33)1.14 (0.96 to 1.34)
Female1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)

Mother’s ethnic background
White British1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Pakistani, UK born1.44 (1.09 to 1.89)1.44 (1.06 to 1.94)1.36 (1.04 to 1.77)1.46 (1.10 to 1.94)
Pakistani, not UK born1.48 (1.16 to 1.91)1.42 (1.07 to 1.90)1.40 (1.10 to 1.77)1.56 (1.19 to 2.04)
Other0.68 (0.51 to 0.90)0.70 (0.52 to 0.96)0.88 (0.67 to 1.15)0.98 (0.74 to 1.31)

Socioeconomic status
Least deprived and most educated1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Employed not materially deprived0.82 (0.62 to 1.09)0.79 (0.59 to 1.06)1.15 (0.88 to 1.50)1.13 (0.85 to 1.50)
Employed with no access to money0.95 (0.72 to 1.25)0.92 (0.69 to 1.22)1.14 (0.88 to 1.50)1.11 (0.85 to 1.46)
On benefits but coping1.13 (0.88 to 1.45)0.92 (0.70 to 1.21)1.38 (1.08 to 1.76)1.26 (0.97 to 1.64)
Most deprived1.41 (1.06 to 1.87)1.36 (1.00 to 1.86)1.28 (0.96 to 1.69)1.26 (0.93 to 1.70)

Mother smoking during pregnancy
No1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Yes1.02 (0.80 to 1.32)1.00 (0.78 to 1.27)

Congenital anomalies
No1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Yes1.78 (1.12 to 2.83)1.63 (1.01 to 2.63)1.78 (1.11 to 2.83)1.57 (0.98 to 2.51)

Gestational age
Term/late-term1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Early/preterm0.99 (0.82 to 1.20)0.97 (0.80 to 1.18)1.22 (1.01 to 1.46)1.20 (1.00 to 1.45)

Quarter of birth
January–March1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
April–June1.26 (0.99 to 1.60)1.33 (1.04 to 1.69)1.13 (0.89 to 1.42)
July–September0.99 (0.78 to 1.26)0.99 (0.77 to 1.26)1.20 (0.95 to 1.51)
October–December0.94 (0.74 to 1.18)0.91 (0.71 to 1.15)1.27 (1.01 to 1.59)

Delivery mode
Vaginal1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Caesarean1.21 (0.99 to 1.49)1.23 (1.00 to 1.53)1.10 (0.90 to 1.35)1.08 (0.88 to 1.32)

Breastfeeding duration, months
<11.29 (1.05 to 1.57)1.21 (0.97 to 1.50)1.29 (1.07 to 1.57)1.22 (0.99 to 1.50)
1–<61.17 (0.93 to 1.47)1.11 (0.87 to 1.41)1.06 (0.85 to 1.33)0.98 (0.78 to 1.24)
≥61.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)

Quartile of PM2.5 in relation to Bradford levelc
1st/2nd quartile1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
3rd quartile1.11 (0.91 to 1.37)0.99 (0.81 to 1.23)0.94 (0.76 to 1.16)
4th quartile1.03 (0.78 to 1.36)1.03 (0.80 to 1.32)0.97 (0.75 to 1.26)

Formal childcare
No1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Yes0.99 (0.79 to 1.25)1.29 (1.00 to 1.66)1.22 (0.97 to 1.53)1.45 (1.12 to 1.87)

Household mould/damp
No mould or damp1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Mould or damp1.01 (0.82 to 1.23)0.98 (0.80 to 1.21)0.98 (0.79 to 1.21)

Number of people in household
2–51.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
≥61.54 (1.27 to 1.86)1.41 (1.14 to 1.74)1.23 (1.02 to 1.49)

Cooking type
Electric cooking only1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
Electric and gas cooking1.14 (0.84 to 1.56)1.18 (0.84 to 1.66)
Gas cooking only1.17 (0.90 to 1.54)1.40 (1.05 to 1.86)

Intra-GP surgery correlation coefficient 0.09 (0.06 to 0.15)0.07 (0.04 to 0.11)

Crude and mutually adjusted models for amoxicillin prescribing during the first and second years of life. All models included GP surgery as the mixed-effect. Mutually adjusted models were adjusted for the mother’s ethnic background, socioeconomic status, and infant sex a priori, as well as: (a) first year of life: congenital anomalies, gestational age, quarter of birth, delivery mode, breastfeeding duration, formal childcare attendance, household mould or damp, and household overcrowding; (b) second year of life: congenital anomalies, gestational age, delivery mode, breastfeeding duration, PM exposure, and formal childcare attendance.

Models for year 2 include variables imputed using multivariate imputation.

The median and IQR for the absolute PM

Associations between exposures and amoxicillin prescribing during the first 2 years of life Crude and mutually adjusted models for amoxicillin prescribing during the first and second years of life. All models included GP surgery as the mixed-effect. Mutually adjusted models were adjusted for the mother’s ethnic background, socioeconomic status, and infant sex a priori, as well as: (a) first year of life: congenital anomalies, gestational age, quarter of birth, delivery mode, breastfeeding duration, formal childcare attendance, household mould or damp, and household overcrowding; (b) second year of life: congenital anomalies, gestational age, delivery mode, breastfeeding duration, PM exposure, and formal childcare attendance. Models for year 2 include variables imputed using multivariate imputation. The median and IQR for the absolute PM Odds were also higher for infants who were male, had at least one congenital anomaly, born in April–June (compared with January–March), born via caesarean section, living in a household with ≥6 people, and attending formal childcare. Based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, GP surgery-level variation explained 9% (95% CI = 6 to 15) of the residual variation in amoxicillin prescribing during year 1. The odds of receiving at least one amoxicillin prescription during the second year of life were higher for children with mothers with a Pakistani ethnic background (regardless of whether mothers were born within [aOR 1.46, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.94] or outside of [aOR 1.56, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.04] the UK) compared with children with White British mothers. Children born preterm/early-term and those attending formal childcare also had higher odds of amoxicillin prescribing (aOR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.45 and 1.45, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.87, respectively). GP surgery-level variation explained 7% (95% CI = 4 to 11) of the residual variation in amoxicillin prescribing during year 2. No significant associations were observed between amoxicillin prescribing and maternal smoking during pregnancy, breastfeeding duration, nor exposure to environmental PM2.5, household mould or damp, or household gas cooking during either year. Model results based on complete cases were comparable (see Supplementary Table S5).

GP consultations for RTIs

Rates of URTI consultations were 309 (95% CI = 287 to 332) per 1000 child–years during the first year of life and 263 (95% CI = 243 to 284) during the second year. Rates of LRTI consultations were 458 (95% CI = 432 to 486) per 1000 child–years during the first year and 409 (95% CI = 384 to 435) during the second year (see Supplementary Table S6). Associations were observed between the odds of having at least one URTI GP consultation and ethnic background and breastfeeding duration during years 1 and 2 (see Supplementary Table S7). In total, 13% (95% CI = 8 to 20) of the residual variation in URTI consultations was explained by GP surgery-level variation during year 1 and 14% (95% CI = 9 to 22) during year 2. For LRTIs, significant associations were observed between GP consultation attendance and sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status during year 1, and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, congenital anomalies, delivery mode, and childcare attendance during year 2 (see Supplementary Table S8). In total, 11% of the residual variation in LRTI consultations (95% CI = 7 to 18) during year 1 and 15% (95% CI = 9 to 23) during year 2, was explained by GP surgery-level variation. No significant associations were observed between RTI consultations and maternal smoking, season of birth, gestational age at delivery, household overcrowding, nor exposure to ambient air pollution, household mould or damp, or household gas cooking.

DISCUSSION

Summary

This study found that 42.5% (n = 1060/2493) of children were prescribed amoxicillin at least once during their first year of life and 46.9% (n = 1169/2493) during their second year. Having a mother with a Pakistani ethnic background, irrespective of their country of birth, and childcare attendance were associated with amoxicillin prescribing across both years. Socioeconomic status, birth characteristics, and household overcrowding were significantly associated with amoxicillin prescribing during the first year only, whereas prematurity was significantly associated with amoxicillin prescribing during the second year only. Less than 10% of the total variance was attributed to GP surgery-level variation in amoxicillin prescribing. Ethnic background and childcare attendance were significantly associated with having at least one primary care consultation for URTIs and LRTIs. Breastfeeding status was associated with URTI consultation attendance only, whereas socioeconomic status, congenital anomalies, and delivery mode were associated with LRTI consultation attendance only. In total, 11%–15% of the variation in the probability of attending at least one RTI consultation was attributed to GP surgery-level variation.

Strengths and limitations

A strength of this study is the comprehensive analysis of risk factors for amoxicillin prescribing, enabled by linking rich, longitudinal questionnaire data to routinely collected maternity and primary care records, and air pollution data. The ethnic diversity of the BiB cohort makes it particularly well suited to study ethnic differences in child health outcomes. However, first, the data include children growing up in Bradford, and a limitation is therefore that this may not be representative of all children in England. Second, some environmental exposures were collected by parental report and may be subject to recall bias. Third, the indications for antibiotic prescribing were not examined, as these are inconsistently recorded in primary care.[29] Further, this study focused on prescribing in primary care, excluding prescribing for more severe indications in hospitals.[2] Lastly, the prescribing data were collected between 2008 and 2013, before the development of the UK 5-year antimicrobial resistance strategy to reduce overprescribing of antibiotics.[2] Despite these limitations, these data are well suited to provide new insights on amoxicillin prescribing patterns among children in England.

Comparison with existing literature

Rates of amoxicillin prescribing in the current study are considerably higher than previous estimates, which may reflect the characteristics of the BiB cohort (see Supplementary Table S8).[3],[6] These findings of an increased likelihood of amoxicillin prescribing for more deprived children and children with mothers with a Pakistani ethnic background mirror findings in adults.[4],[5],[19] Ethnic differences in prescribing may reflect differences in the severity of presenting illness, which is a key determinant for antibiotic prescribing, or differences in population mixing, parental expectation, or clinician response.[30] Increased odds of amoxicillin prescribing during the first year of life for the most deprived children was observed. Significant socioeconomic differences were also observed in GP consultation attendance for LRTIs but not URTIs, suggesting infection severity differs by socioeconomic background. The socioeconomic disparity may be more significant than the current study’s results suggest, as poorer BiB mothers are less likely to consult primary care once health status is taken into account.[31] Socioeconomic differences were found to be more profound for LRTI consultations compared with amoxicillin prescribing, which may indicate that antibiotic prescribing guidelines reduce socioeconomic differences in prescribing, but not incidence of infection.[32],[33] Primary care physicians play a vital role in reducing antibiotic prescribing. A modest but significant variation in amoxicillin prescribing was identified between practices (7%–9%). This is smaller than previous estimates, which range from 32.0% to 65.0%.[6],[34],[35] However, previous studies have included data from across England, whereas the GP surgeries in this study all reside within the Bradford District and Craven Clinical Commissioning Group. Residual variation in antibiotic prescribing may reflect differences in provider services and prescribing practices, or differences in health need. This study also found higher variation in childhood RTI consultation attendance between GP surgeries, hinting that GP surgery-level variation in prescribing may be driven by differences in health need or individual access to services, rather than the GP surgery’s prescribing practices. Although previous studies suggest that targeting physician behaviour can reduce antibiotic prescribing,[36] these findings highlight the importance of interventions at the population level. Further research considering detailed individual-level characteristics and indicators of infection risk (including overcrowding and childcare attendance) would determine where population-level antimicrobial stewardship efforts are best targeted. Surprisingly, associations between maternal smoking or outdoor air pollution and RTI consultation attendance or amoxicillin prescribing were not observed. Regarding maternal smoking, this may be unique to the Bradford population because of the disparity between smoking habits observed between mothers of White British and Pakistani ethnic background. Furthermore, self-report of maternal smoking may not represent true behaviours; research has shown that mothers from less deprived areas are less likely to report their smoking during pregnancy.[37] PM2.5 has previously been found to increase the risk of URTIs and LRTIs.[38],[39] However, given that small effect sizes are expected, larger studies over broader geographical areas with greater variation in PM2.5 exposure are required to address its role in RTIs and antibiotic prescribing.[40] Linking datasets on environmental exposures to newly available national primary care dispensing data could aid in these studies.[41]

Implications for research and practice

These findings highlight the need for policies addressing the population-level inequalities associated with RTIs when addressing antimicrobial stewardship efforts among children, particularly ethnic background and socioeconomic status. Primary care networks, through which primary care practices link with other health and social care providers, provide an opportunity for GPs to promote handwashing and improved ventilation in homes (particularly those that are overcrowded) and childcare settings to prevent the spread of infection. Partnerships with pharmacies and voluntary sector organisations, for example, could help facilitate these efforts. Furthermore, this study found that children who were breastfed for <1 month were more likely to attend consultations for URTIs. There are useful published resources to aid GPs when providing breastfeeding support, including those published by the UK GP Infant Feeding Network.[42],[43] Primary care networks could also play a role in linking primary care to local breastfeeding support groups. Larger, national studies investigating the effect of environmental exposures on childhood respiratory health and antibiotic prescribing are recommended.

How this fits in

Prescribing of antibiotics during childhood contributes to antimicrobial resistance, which is a major public health concern. This study linked rich cohort data to routinely collected primary care data to identify ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in childhood respiratory infections and amoxicillin prescribing. The study highlights that population-level interventions, including reducing household overcrowding and supporting hygiene measures in childcare settings, are required to reduce the need for antibiotic prescribing in young children, thereby supporting antimicrobial stewardship efforts in primary care.
  35 in total

1.  The history of the Read Codes: the inaugural James Read Memorial Lecture 2011.

Authors:  Tim Benson
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2011

2.  Creating medical and drug code lists to identify cases in primary care databases.

Authors:  Shreya Davé; Irene Petersen
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Association of antibiotics in infancy with early childhood obesity.

Authors:  L Charles Bailey; Christopher B Forrest; Peixin Zhang; Thomas M Richards; Alice Livshits; Patricia A DeRusso
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 4.  Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?

Authors:  S Willems; S De Maesschalck; M Deveugele; A Derese; J De Maeseneer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-02

5.  Clinical predictors of antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in primary care: an observational study.

Authors:  Kathryn O'Brien; Thomas Wyn Bellis; Mark Kelson; Kerenza Hood; Christopher C Butler; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Formula feeding increases the risk of antibiotic prescriptions in children up to 2 years: results from a cohort study.

Authors:  Simona Di Mario; Carlo Gagliotti; Andrea Donatini; Sergio Battaglia; Rossella Buttazzi; Sara Balduzzi; Silvana Borsari; Vittorio Basevi; Luca Barbieri
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Changes in clinical indications for community antibiotic prescribing for children in the UK from 1996 to 2006: will the new NICE prescribing guidance on upper respiratory tract infections just be ignored?

Authors:  P L Thompson; N Spyridis; M Sharland; R E Gilbert; S Saxena; P F Long; A P Johnson; I C K Wong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Maternal health inequalities and GP provision: investigating variation in consultation rates for women in the Born in Bradford cohort.

Authors:  Brian Kelly; Dan Mason; Emily S Petherick; John Wright; Mohammed A Mohammed; Chris Bates
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  Air pollution and respiratory infections during early childhood: an analysis of 10 European birth cohorts within the ESCAPE Project.

Authors:  Elaina A MacIntyre; Ulrike Gehring; Anna Mölter; Elaine Fuertes; Claudia Klümper; Ursula Krämer; Ulrich Quass; Barbara Hoffmann; Mireia Gascon; Bert Brunekreef; Gerard H Koppelman; Rob Beelen; Gerard Hoek; Matthias Birk; Johan C de Jongste; H A Smit; Josef Cyrys; Olena Gruzieva; Michal Korek; Anna Bergström; Raymond M Agius; Frank de Vocht; Angela Simpson; Daniela Porta; Francesco Forastiere; Chiara Badaloni; Giulia Cesaroni; Ana Esplugues; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Aitana Lerxundi; Jordi Sunyer; Marta Cirach; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Göran Pershagen; Joachim Heinrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Is small size at birth associated with early childhood morbidity in white British and Pakistani origin UK children aged 0-3? Findings from the born in Bradford cohort study.

Authors:  Jane West; Brian Kelly; Paul J Collings; Gillian Santorelli; Dan Mason; John Wright
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.