| Literature DB >> 35814878 |
Suvidha Tammewar1, Rasika Gadkari2.
Abstract
Aims: The present study evaluated the frequency of micronuclei in oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and their association with the presence of dysplasia on cytology and biopsy as well as their association with p53 mutation and p16 expression. Cytological findings of dysplastic changes in OPMDs were compared to histological diagnoses. Material andEntities:
Keywords: Micronuclei; OPMD; p16 expression; p53 mutation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814878 PMCID: PMC9262000 DOI: 10.4103/joc.joc_198_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cytol ISSN: 0970-9371 Impact factor: 1.577
Figure 1Smear showing 6 microneuclei in a cell (PAP, 40×)
Association of age and sex with micronuclear frequency (N=76)
| Correlation of Age (in years) with Micronuclear frequency per 100 cells | |
|---|---|
| Age (Mean±SD) | 40.53 (± 9.51) |
| Micronuclear frequency (Mean±SD) | 2 (± 1.9) |
| Spearman correlation coeff. | 0.102 |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.382 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Sex* | |
| Male | 57 (75) |
| Female | 19 (25) |
|
| 446.0 |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.242 |
* Sex, expressed as Total number (percentage)
Frequency of substance used and oral lesions
| Frequency (Percentage) | |
|---|---|
| Substance used | |
| None | 15 (19.7) |
| Oral tobacco | 53 (69.7) |
| Smoking | 4 (5.2) |
| Alcohol | 1 (1.3) |
| Combined use | 3 (3.9) |
| Gross appearance of oral lesions | |
| Leukoplakia | 23 (30.3) |
| Erythroplakia | 3 (3.9) |
| OSMF* | 1 (1.3) |
| Ulcer | 49 (64.5) |
*OSMF: Oral Submucus Fibrosis
Figure 2A case of dysplasia on scrape smears with cells showing high N/C ratio, nuclear hyperchromasia and nuclear polymorphism (H/E, 40×)
Findings of cytology, histology, and microarray of oral premalignant lesions
| Gross appearance of OPMD → | Leukoplakia | Erythroplakia | OSMF | Ulcer | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytology findings ( | |||||
| | 8 (34.8) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 29 (59.2) | 39 (51.3) |
| | 15 (65.2) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (100.0) | 20 (40.8) | 37 (48.7) |
| Histology findings ( | |||||
| | 10 (83.3) | 1 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 23 (100.0) | 34 (94.4) |
| | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.6) |
| Microarray findings ( | |||||
| | 5 (62.5) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 16 (84.2) | 22 (78.6) |
| | 3 (37.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (15.8) | 6 (21.4) |
| | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (26.3) | 9 (32.1) |
| | 4 (50.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (73.7) | 19 (67.8) |
Frequency expressed as Total number (percentage)
Association of micronuclei frequency per 100 cells with dysplastic changes seen on cytology and histology as well as with p53 mutation and p16 expression
| Pathological findings subgroups | Mean frequency (±S.D.) of micronuclei per 100 cells |
|---|---|
| Cytology findings ( | |
| Dysplasia present ( | 2.82 (±1.93) |
| No dysplasia ( | 1.14 (±1.27) |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.000* |
| Histology findings ( | |
| Dysplasia present ( | 2.12 (±2.08) |
| No dysplasia ( | 1 ( |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.436 |
| Microarray findings ( | |
| p53 mutation present ( | 2.59 (±2.3) |
| p53 mutation absent ( | 1.00 (±0.63) |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.069 |
| p16 expression present ( | 1.44 (±1.59) |
| p16 expression absent ( | 2.63 (±2.31) |
| Sig. (2 tailed) | 0.095 |
(Statistical significance calculated using Mann–Whitney U test)
Comparison of findings on cytology and histology. (n=36)
| Histology dysplasia | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Absent | Present | ||
| Cytology dysplasia | |||
| Absent | 1 | 12 | 13 |
| Present | 1 | 22 | 23 |
| Total | 2 | 34 | 36 |
Sensitivity of the cytology to measure dysplasia: 22/34 * 100=64.7%
Graph 1Receiver operating characteristic curve for association of micronuclear frequency with cytological diagnosis of dysplasia under the non-parametric assumption. Area under curve: 0.763; Asymptotic Sig. (P) < 0.001. Red Circle indicates optimal cut off point as per Youden’s index at the sensitivity value 0.744 and 1-specificity value of 0.296
Figure 3A case of well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma which was p53+ve (40×)
Figure 4A case of squamous cell carcinoma positive for p16(40×)