| Literature DB >> 35814146 |
Carmen Fernandez-Ortega1, Jeronimo González-Bernal1, Sergio Gonzalez-Bernal1, Ruben Trigueros2, José M Aguilar-Parra2, Luis A Minguez-Minguez1, Ana I Obregon3, Raquel De La Fuente Anuncibay1.
Abstract
Childhood obesity, linked to a sedentary lifestyle and an unbalanced diet, is one of the main problems in today's Western societies. In this sense, the aim of the study was to analyze students' perceived satisfaction in physical education classes with learning strategies and engagement in learning and critical thinking as determinants of healthy lifestyle habits. The study involved 2,439 high school students aged 12-18 years (M = 14.66, SD = 1.78). Structural equation modeling was conducted to analyze the predictive relationships between the study variables. The results showed that teaching, teaching mastery, and cognitive development are precursors to deep thinking on the part of students, indicators of the adoption of healthy lifestyle habits. These results reflect the importance of the methodology adopted by the teacher in order to positively influence the students' habits.Entities:
Keywords: critical thinking; healthy lifestyle habits; metacognitive strategies; physical education; teaching
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814146 PMCID: PMC9258624 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Adjustment indexes.
| Estadístics | Good indexes |
| Chi square/degree freedom | Between 2 and 3 |
| Comparative fit index (CFI) | Greater than 0.95 |
| Incremental fit index (IFI) | Greater than 0.95 |
| Tucker lewis index (TLI) | Greater than 0.95 |
| Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) y su intervalo de confianza al 90% | Equal or less than 0.06 |
| Standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) | Equal or less than 0.08 |
Descriptive statistics and correlations between all variables.
| Factors |
|
| α | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 1. Cognitive development | 5.65 | 0.93 | 0.80 | − | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.31 |
| 2. Mastery teaching | 6.04 | 0.68 | 0.83 | − | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.30 | |
| 3. Teaching | 6.18 | 0.71 | 0.85 | − | 0.56 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.26 | ||
| 4. Metacognitive strategies | 3.63 | 1.12 | 0.82 | − | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.22 | |||
| 5. Learning engagement | 3.83 | 1.07 | 0.86 | − | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.31 | ||||
| 6. Critical thinking | 3.53 | 1.14 | 0.83 | − | 0.66 | 0.59 | |||||
| 7. Intention to be Physically active | 5.35 | 0.78 | 0.80 | − | 0.64 | ||||||
| 8. Mediterranean diet | 8.22 | 0.69 | 0.79 | − |
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 1Structural equational modeling. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.