| Literature DB >> 35813264 |
Keyang Lyu1, Siyang Feng2, Xia Li1, Qin Wang1, Xiaoning Zhao3, Shuyuan Yu2, Ping Zheng1, Jiajia Ji2, Guomin Chen2, Jing Liang4, Tao Lan2, Jinshu Feng2, Shuai Jiang2, Jianhua Lu2, Tianlong Xia2, Chaoqiong Peng2, Tiejian Feng2, Dongqun Xu1.
Abstract
What is already known about this topic?: Aerosol transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) via sanitary pipelines in high-rise buildings is possible, however, there is a lack of experimental evidence. What is added by this report?: The field simulation experiment confirmed the existence of a vertical aerosol transmission pathway from toilet flush-soil stack-floor drains without water seal. This report provided experimental evidence for vertical aerosol transmission of clustered outbreaks on 18 floors of a 33-story residential building. What are the implications for public health practice?: The water seal on floor drains is a necessary barrier to prevent the risk of vertical aerosol transmission of infectious disease pathogens in buildings. It is necessary not only to have a U-shaped trap in the drainage pipe, but also to be filled with water regularly. Copyright and License information: Editorial Office of CCDCW, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Aerosol transmission; Floor drain; SARS-CoV-2; Toilet flush
Year: 2022 PMID: 35813264 PMCID: PMC9257235 DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: China CDC Wkly ISSN: 2096-7071
Figure 1Diagram of positive case distribution and cross-layer vertical aerosol transmission of the 7th house layout in the high-rise building. (A) The diagram of the positive cases distributed in the 7th layout across 18 floors and rooms of field simulation experiment in the 33-story building. (B) The diagram of the drainage pipelines and soil stack system in the 7th house layout.
The observation results of fluorescent microspheres of filter membrane sample and smear swab sample.
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Note: The aerosol filter membrane samples collected by medium flow PM10 samplers (100 L/min) in the bathroom of each room. The smear swab samples were collected from the floor drain of the kitchen with cotton swab. No smear swab samples were collected from the kitchen of rooms 1107 and 2607 because the floor drains were hidden in the cupboards. The smear swab samples of room 1507 were not observed. The green dots (
| ||||
| 907 |
|
|
| |
| 1107 |
|
| ||
| 1507 |
|
| ||
| 2007 |
|
|
| |
| 2407 |
|
|
| |
| 2607 |
|
| ||
| 2807 |
|
|
| |
Figure 2Representative photos of fluorescent microspheres tracked by different sampling methods at different rooms in 2 scenarios. (A) the aerosol filter membrane sample of room 2807 during scenario 1; (B) the aerosol filter membrane sample of room 1107 during scenario 2; (C) smear swab sample from the floor drain of the kitchen of room 1107 during scenario 2.
The array and combination mode of defection simulation and toilet flushing in 2 scenarios.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Note: The simulants were poured into the toilet for the first 40 minutes of the simulation experiment, and the toilet was flushed every 10 minutes. The letter “D” means pouring simulants into the toilet, and letter “F” indicates toilet flushing. | |||||||||
| 1 | 10 | D/F | F | F | |||||
| 20 | D/F | F | F | ||||||
| 30 | D/F | F | F | F | |||||
| 40 | D/F | F | F | F | |||||
| 50 | F | F | F | F | F | ||||
| 60 | F | F | F | F | F | ||||
| 2 | 10 | D/F | F | D/F | D/F | F | |||
| 20 | D/F | D/F | F | F | D/F | ||||
| 30 | D/F | F | D/F | F | D/F | F | |||
| 40 | D/F | F | D/F | F | F | D/F | |||
| 50 | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | ||
| 60 | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | ||