Literature DB >> 35812041

A detailed assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade.

Cheng-Rui Zhong1,2, Ji-Liang Qiu1,2, Yi-Chuan Yuan1,2, Zhi-Yu Qiu1,2, Kai Li1,2, Chen-Wei Wang1,2, Yun-Xing Shi1,2, Ke-Ren Li1,2, Zhu Lin1,2, Zhen-Kun Huang1,2, Wei He1,2, Bin-Kui Li1,2, Yun-Fei Yuan1,2.   

Abstract

Recently, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, a continuous index consisting of only albumin and bilirubin, has been developed for objectively assessing liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the ALBI score was arbitrarily categorized into three ALBI grades based on two artificially predetermined cutoff points with no explanation and statistical grounds, causing a considerable loss of discriminatory ability. This study aims to propose a modified ALBI (mALBI) grade for offering a detailed evaluation of hepatic reserve and specify its role during clinical practice in the HCC setting. The study population comprised 3540 HCC patients treated with mainstream therapies including hepatectomy (n=2056), thermal ablation (n=550), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (n=934) from 2002 to 2017. The ALBI score was stratified into four mALBI grades through a recently proposed statistical method aiming to select the optimal cutoff points of a continuous predictive variable by maximizing the discriminative ability in a multivariable Cox regression model. The mALBI grade had an overall better discriminatory ability than the ALBI grade in predicting overall survival through Harrell's C-index (0.614 vs. 0.598, P<0.001). Both visual inspections of Kaplan-Meier curves and calculation of hazard ratios displayed a more subtle evaluation of liver function using the mALBI grade. Moreover, the newly identified cut-point (ALBI score = -2.29) between the mALBI grade 2a and 2b was much closer to a 30% retention rate of indocyanine green at 15 minutes, an indicator for the performance of a subsegmentectomy. The newly proposed mALBI grade provides a more subtle assessment of liver function to guide clinical decision-making and predicts the prognosis of HCC patients more accurately than the original ALBI grade. AJCR
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALBI grade; Liver function; hepatocellular carcinoma; mALBI grade; prognosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35812041      PMCID: PMC9251706     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   5.942


  23 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Laura M Kulik; Richard S Finn; Claude B Sirlin; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Andrew X Zhu; M Hassan Murad; Jorge A Marrero
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Method for grading breast cancer.

Authors:  E W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Child-Pugh Classification: Time to Abandon?

Authors:  Beverley Kok; Juan G Abraldes
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 6.  EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Validation of Modified ALBI Grade for More Detailed Assessment of Hepatic Function in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Atsushi Hiraoka; Takashi Kumada; Kunihiko Tsuji; Koichi Takaguchi; Ei Itobayashi; Kazuya Kariyama; Hironori Ochi; Kazuto Tajiri; Masashi Hirooka; Noritomo Shimada; Toru Ishikawa; Yoshihiko Tachi; Toshifumi Tada; Hidenori Toyoda; Kazuhiro Nouso; Kouji Joko; Yoichi Hiasa; Kojiro Michitaka; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.740

8.  Validation and Potential of Albumin-Bilirubin Grade and Prognostication in a Nationwide Survey of 46,681 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Japan: The Need for a More Detailed Evaluation of Hepatic Function.

Authors:  Atsushi Hiraoka; Kojiro Michitaka; Takashi Kumada; Namiki Izumi; Masumi Kadoya; Norihiro Kokudo; Shoji Kubo; Yutaka Matsuyama; Osamu Nakashima; Michiie Sakamoto; Tadatoshi Takayama; Takashi Kokudo; Kosuke Kashiwabara; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Assessment of Preoperative Liver Function for Surgical Decision Making in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Takashi Kokudo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Chikara Shirata; Meguri Tanimoto; Takeaki Ishizawa; Junichi Kaneko; Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Junichi Arita; Nicolas Demartines; Emilie Uldry; Norihiro Kokudo; Nermin Halkic
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 11.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.