| Literature DB >> 35810015 |
Neide da Silva Knihs1, Ariadne Matzembacher da Silva2, Maria Augusta Dietrich2, Monyque Cristina Rodrigues2, Suyan Sens2, Laísa Fischer Wachholz2, Tamires de Mello2, Ivonei Bittencourt3, Marisa da Silva Martins2, Aline Lima Pestana Magalhães2, Lúcia Nazareth Amante2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify home care management strategies for patients undergoing liver transplant, through teleconsultation, during the COVID-19 pandemic for maintenance and improvements in treatment adherence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35810015 PMCID: PMC9023345 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.03.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transplant Proc ISSN: 0041-1345 Impact factor: 1.014
Characterization of Participants and Variables Related to Transplant, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2022
| Variable | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Participants (n = 22) | n | % |
| Patients | 12 | 54.5 |
| Wife | 6 | 27.2 |
| Children | 4 | 18.3 |
| Sex (n = 22) | n | % |
| Male | 10 | 45.5 |
| Female | 12 | 54.5 |
| Age in years (n = 22) | n | % |
| 25-34 | 6 | 27.2 |
| 35-44 | 5 | 22.7 |
| 45-54 | 8 | 36.4 |
| 55-64 | 3 | 13.7 |
| Mean | Standard deviation | |
| Age of patients in years (n = 12) | 55 | 21 |
| MELD (n = 12) | 18 | 12 |
| Indication for transplant (n = 12) | n | % |
| Virus C | 3 | 25 |
| Cirrhosis due to alcohol | 3 | 25 |
| Cryptogenic cirrhosis | 2 | 16.6 |
| Others | 4 | 33.3 |
| Type of donor (n = 12) | n | % |
| Deceased donor | 12 | 100 |
| Living donor | 0 | 0 |
| Complications (n = 12) | n | % |
| Cytomegalovirus | 6 | 50 |
| Infections | 4 | 33.3 |
| Bile ducts | 2 | 16.7 |
| Posttransplant time at the beginning of the study (interval/d) (n = 12) | n | % |
| 15-24 | 6 | 50 |
| 25-34 | 3 | 25 |
| 35-44 | 2 | 16.7 |
| 45-54 | 1 | 8.3 |
| 55-64 | 0 | 0 |
MELD, Model for End Stage Liver Disease.
Presentation of the Composition of the First Category: Developing Health Care to Minimize the Risk of Contamination From SARS-CoV -2
| Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 Prevention | Developed Care | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanitation and cleaning | When outside of the home, used alcohol sanitization gel, gloves, and 2 masks. | 22 | 100 |
| The caregiver cleaned all of the products they brought to the house. | 22 | 100 | |
| When the caregiver returned to the patient's home after performing outside activities, the caregiver took a shower and changed all their clothes before being in contact with the patient. | 18 | 81.8 | |
| Reorganization for follow-up with the team | There was weekly communication with the team through Internet technologies, avoiding in-person contact. | 22 | 100 |
| In the case of signs and symptoms that generated doubts, there was communication with the support team. The signs and symptoms were investigated and, if necessary, the team requested the patient send photos, videos, and voice messages for further clarification and decision making. | 16 | 72.7 | |
| Reviewed the best times to communicate with the team so that there is as minimal presence of the other patients in the outpatient clinic. | 18 | 81.8 | |
| Social isolation | Patient and caregiver stayed at home. They only went out for appointments with the team and for exams. | 18 | 81.8 |
| Patient stayed in one room of the house, not circulating through the other spaces in the home due to the presence of other family members. | 12 | 54.5 | |
| During the first 6 months, the patient did not leave the house for any other activity. The patient was afraid of being contaminated by SARS-CoV-2. | 11 | 50 | |
| Restructuring the movement of family members in the home | Family members moved to other people's homes because they had to leave every day for work. | 14 | 54.5 |
| Family members were not allowed to visit for a period of 3 months. | 12 | 54.5 | |
| Only the patient and the caregiver stayed in the house. When there were children, the children stayed with a relative (grandparents, uncles, and friends). | 8 | 36.3 | |
| Family members who went to work, and on returning home, initially went to the bathroom and changed their clothes. They also tried to wear a mask at home and physically distanced themselves from the transplanted patient. | 10 | 45.5 |
Presentation of the Composition of the Second Category: Trying to Resume Routine Even with the Challenge of the Risk of Contamination by SARS-CoV-2
| Strategies to Return to Routine Even With the Pandemic | Care to Move Forward Even in the Face of Pandemic Limitations | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concern with the body | Performed outdoor physical activity, such as cycling and walking, while taking care to avoid contamination. | 6 | 27.3 |
| Carefully monitored food since the patient spent more time alone at home and needed to be careful with the consumption and quantity of food. | 14 | 63.4 | |
| Maintaining mental and emotional health | Communicated, through digital technologies, with family members who did not reside in the house. | 12 | 54.5 |
| Meeting, at a distance, with family members who left the house. | 6 | 27.3 | |
| Organizing the spaces in the house because of family members who remained residing in the house. | 14 | 63.4 | |
| Resuming routines after the release to the team | Left home to go to the market, bakery, pharmacy, and other places; the patients always maintained SARS-CoV-2 prevention. | 16 | 72.3 |
| Returning to work, keeping distance from other people, and using 2 masks and alcohol sanitization gel. | 2 | 9 | |
| Participated in family and friend gatherings, but always kept physically distant and implemented all possible care. | 12 | 54.5 |