| Literature DB >> 35807747 |
Huan Yu1, Qiaorui Wen1, Jun Lv1,2,3, Dianjianyi Sun1,3, Yuan Ma3,4, Sailimai Man1,4, Jianchun Yin4, Mingkun Tong3,4, Bo Wang2,3,4, Canqing Yu1,2,3, Liming Li1,2,3.
Abstract
It is unclear how the dietary patterns reflecting C-reactive protein (CRP) affect metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the Chinese population. To examine the effect of the dietary pattern reflecting CRP with MetS, a cross-sectional study was based on the health checkup data from the Beijing MJ Health Screening Centers between 2008 and 2018. The CRP-related dietary pattern was derived from 17 food groups using reduced-rank regression. Participants were divided into five groups according to the quintiles of dietary pattern score. Multivariate logistic regression was then applied to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the quintiles of diet pattern score related to MetS and its four components. Of the 90,130 participants included in this study, 11,209 had MetS. A CRP-related dietary pattern was derived, characterized by a higher consumption of staple food, fresh meat, processed products, and sugar-sweetened beverages but a lower intake of honey and jam, fruits, and dairy products. Compared with participants in the lowest quintile (Q1), participants in the higher quintiles were associated with increased risks of MetS in a dose-response manner after adjustment for potential confounders (p for linear trend < 0.001), the ORs for Q2 to Q5 were 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02-1.19), 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.22), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.15-1.33), and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.38-1.61), respectively. Moreover, the effects were stronger among individuals aged 50 years or older. A CRP-related dietary pattern was associated with the risk of MetS. It provides new insights that dietary intervention to achieve a lower inflammatory level could potentially prevent MetS.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; cross-sectional study; dietary patterns; metabolic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807747 PMCID: PMC9268474 DOI: 10.3390/nu14132566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Factor loadings of dietary patterns derived from reduced rank regression (RRR) in the Chinese population of MJ Health Database (n = 18,986). The length of the bar shows the loading of specific food components on C-reactive protein (CRP)-related dietary pattern. The bar indicates a positive load to the right and a negative load to the left.
Characteristics of participants according to quintiles of dietary pattern scores in MJHSC Database (n = 90,130).
| Characteristics | Dietary Pattern Scores | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | |
| Age (years, | 39.8 ± 11.5 | 40.4 ± 11.5 | 39.6 ± 11.2 | 39.2 ± 11.0 | 38.1 ± 10.3 |
| Male (%) | 30.3 | 41.4 | 51.2 | 63.9 | 75.8 |
| Married (%) | 80.3 | 82.9 | 82.9 | 83.1 | 81.9 |
| College and above (%) | 92.4 | 90.6 | 90.5 | 91.2 | 91.2 |
| Annual income (%) | |||||
| <100,000 | 40.0 | 41.2 | 40.4 | 38.5 | 37.6 |
| 100,000–199,999 | 32.0 | 32.3 | 32.8 | 33.0 | 32.7 |
| ≥200,000 | 28.0 | 26.5 | 26.9 | 28.6 | 29.7 |
| Physical leisure activity (MET-h/day, | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.5 |
| Alcohol consumption (%) | |||||
| Never | 78.4 | 74.7 | 70.6 | 64.6 | 57.1 |
| Former drinker | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Current drinker | 20.0 | 22.4 | 26.4 | 32.4 | 39.9 |
| Smoking (%) | |||||
| Never | 89.2 | 84.8 | 79.9 | 73.3 | 63.5 |
| Former smoker | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 5.0 |
| Current smoker | 7.7 | 11.6 | 16.1 | 21.8 | 31.5 |
| Daily energy intake (kcal/day, | 1085.8 ± 264.9 | 1066.7 ± 235.1 | 1114.9 ± 242.2 | 1186.7 ± 246.8 | 1350.0 ± 285.2 |
| Family History of HTN (%) | 38.2 | 38.9 | 39.4 | 39.99 | 41.3 |
| Family History of DM (%) | 22.4 | 22.1 | 21.8 | 22.6 | 23.6 |
Q indicates quintile; HTN indicates hypertension; DM indicates diabetes. Values are means or percentages of participants adjusted for age and sex as appropriate. * Among 68,523 participants with physical activity information.
Associations between dietary pattern and metabolic syndrome (MetS), as well as its four components. (n = 90,130).
| OR (95% CI) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| MetS | ||||||
| Cases ( | 1374 | 1836 | 2167 | 2558 | 3274 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.15 (1.06, 1.24) | 1.23 (1.14, 1.32) | 1.38 (1.28, 1.48) | 1.77 (1.64, 1.90) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.10 (1.02, 1.19) | 1.14 (1.05, 1.22) | 1.23 (1.15, 1.33) | 1.49 (1.38, 1.61) | <0.001 |
| Abdominal obesity | ||||||
| Cases ( | 2542 | 3249 | 3668 | 4352 | 5353 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) | 1.21 (1.14, 1.28) | 1.33 (1.25, 1.41) | 1.64 (1.55, 1.74) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.11 (1.05, 1.18) | 1.14 (1.07, 1.21) | 1.22 (1.15, 1.29) | 1.45 (1.36, 1.54) | <0.001 |
| Hyperglycemia | ||||||
| Cases ( | 1469 | 1871 | 2050 | 2314 | 2517 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.18 (1.10, 1.28) | 1.32 (1.22, 1.42) | 1.46 (1.35, 1.58) | 1.72 (1.59, 1.86) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.16 (1.07, 1.25) | 1.26 (1.17, 1.36) | 1.35 (1.25, 1.46) | 1.52 (1.40, 1.65) | <0.001 |
| High blood pressure | ||||||
| Cases ( | 2433 | 2933 | 3104 | 3374 | 3651 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.11 (1.04, 1.19) | 1.16 (1.09, 1.24) | 1.17 (1.10, 1.24) | 1.28 (1.20, 1.37) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.09 (1.02, 1.16) | 1.11 (1.04, 1.19) | 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) | 1.19 (1.11, 1.28) | <0.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||||||
| Cases ( | 7243 | 7548 | 7993 | 8553 | 9515 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.98 (0.93, 1.02) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.96, 1.05) | 1.09 (1.05, 1.16) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.96 (0.92, 1.00) | 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) | 0.95 (0.91, 1.00) | 1.00 (0.96, 1.06) | 0.74 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Q indicates quintile; MetS indicates metabolic syndrome. Reference group: the lowest quintile (Q1) of dietary pattern scores. ORs and its 95% CIs were obtained using a logistic regression model. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and daily intake of energy; Model 2 was adjusted for education, annual income, marital status, family history of hypertension, diabetes, physical leisure activity, alcohol use, and smoking status.
Subgroup analysis of the associations between dietary pattern and metabolic syndrome (MetS).
| OR (95% CI) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| Age (years) | <0.001 | |||||
| <50 | 1.00 | 1.08 (0.98, 1.20) | 1.07 (0.97, 1.18) | 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) | 1.44 (1.31, 1.58) | |
| ≥50 | 1.00 | 1.11 (0.99, 1.25) | 1.27 (1.13, 1.43) | 1.32 (1.17, 1.50) | 1.44 (1.26, 1.65) | |
| Sex | 0.38 | |||||
| Male | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.94, 1.13) | 1.06 (0.97, 1.16) | 1.13 (1.04, 1.23) | 1.34 (1.23, 1.46) | |
| Female | 1.00 | 1.17 (1.01, 1.34) | 1.23 (1.07, 1.43) | 1.42 (1.21, 1.66) | 1.79 (1.49, 2.15) | |
| Alcohol | 0.09 | |||||
| Never | 1.00 | 1.12 (1.01, 1.23) | 1.18 (1.07, 1.31) | 1.22 (1.11, 1.35) | 1.51 (1.36, 1.67) | |
| Ever | 1.00 | 1.06 (0.93, 1.20) | 1.07 (0.94, 1.21) | 1.22 (1.08, 1.37) | 1.45 (1.29, 1.62) | |
| Smoking | 0.46 | |||||
| Never | 1.00 | 1.10 (0.99, 1.21) | 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) | 1.24 (1.13, 1.37) | 1.59 (1.43, 1.77) | |
| Ever | 1.00 | 1.09 (0.96, 1.24) | 1.07 (0.95, 1.21) | 1.21 (1.07, 1.36) | 1.38 (1.23, 1.56) | |
| Physical leisure activity level * | 0.28 | |||||
| Low | 1.00 | 1.19 (1.06, 1.35) | 1.21 (1.07, 1.37) | 1.38 (1.23, 1.56) | 1.64 (1.45, 1.85) | |
| High | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) | 1.08 (0.96, 1.22) | 1.11 (0.98, 1.26) | 1.34 (1.19, 1.52) | |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Q indicates quintile. Reference group: the lowest quintile of dietary pattern scores. ORs and its 95% CIs were obtained using logistic regression model. All results were adjusted for age, sex, daily intake of energy, education, annual income, marital status, family history of hypertension and diabetes, physical activity, alcohol use and smoking status. * Physical leisure activity was divided into two groups (Low and High) by the median of the metabolic equivalent hours per day (MET-h/day).