| Literature DB >> 35807734 |
Bojan Konstantinović1, Milena Popov1, Nataša Samardžić1, Milica Aćimović2, Jovana Šućur Elez1, Tijana Stojanović1, Marina Crnković1, Miloš Rajković2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the hydrolates obtained as the by-products of the Thymus vulgaris essential oil steam distillation process. The bioassays, which were undertaken in order to determine the effect on germination and initial growth of seedlings of some cultivated and weed species, were performed under controlled conditions with different concentrations of the hydrolates. Seeds of Glycine max, Helianthus annuus, Zea mays, Triticum aestivum, Daucus carota subsp. sativus, Allium cepa, Medicago sativa, and Trifolium repens, and six weed species-Amaranthus retroflexus, Chenopodium album, Portulaca oleracea, Echinochloa crus-galli, Sorghum halepense, and Solanum nigrum-were treated with 10, 20, 50, and 100% T. vulgaris hydrolate solution. The obtained results showed that the T. vulgaris hydrolate had the least negative effect on the germination of cultivated species, such as soybean, sunflower and maize, whereas clover and alfalfa were the most sensitive. By comparison, all the tested weed species expressed high susceptibility. It can be concluded that the T. vulgaris hydrolate has an herbicidal effect, in addition to its potential as a biopesticide in terms of integrated weed management.Entities:
Keywords: biopesticide; germination; inhibition; oxidative stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807734 PMCID: PMC9268952 DOI: 10.3390/plants11131782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The obtained results for the calculated germination indices in the case of the tested cultivated species treated with T. vulgaris hydrolate solutions.
| Tested Plant | Concentration | GP (%) | CVG (% Day−1) | GI (−) | t50 (Time) | GRI (%/Day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| soybean | control | 93 | 23.48 | 627 | 2.78 | 33.94 |
| 10% | 74 | 30.58 | 572 | 2.48 | 31.41 | |
| 20% | 71 | 28.18 | 529 | 2.48 | 27.82 | |
| 50% | 66 | 30.56 | 510 | 2.39 | 27.21 | |
| 100% | 60 | 24.00 | 410 | 2.77 | 19.21 | |
| maize | control | 97 | 22.35 | 633 | 4.15 | 27.45 |
| 10% | 80 | 19.66 | 473 | 4.80 | 19.36 | |
| 20% | 82 | 18.34 | 455 | 4.56 | 18.13 | |
| 50% | 65 | 18.36 | 361 | 4.69 | 15.81 | |
| 100% | 21 | 23.33 | 141 | 3.25 | 8.71 | |
| onion | control | 85 | 23.94 | 580 | 3.69 | 26.29 |
| 10% | 75 | 19.74 | 445 | 4.07 | 16.42 | |
| 20% | 33 | 17.94 | 179 | 4.56 | 6.30 | |
| 50% | 21 | 17.95 | 114 | 4.59 | 4.07 | |
| 100% | 10 | 13.51 | 36 | 7.00 | 1.42 | |
| sunflower | control | 89 | 33.21 | 711 | 1.81 | 44.89 |
| 10% | 96 | 34.78 | 780 | 1.77 | 49.72 | |
| 20% | 88 | 19.43 | 515 | 4.18 | 18.13 | |
| 50% | 83 | 21.01 | 518 | 3.81 | 18.42 | |
| 100% | 73 | 25.70 | 519 | 2.68 | 23.79 | |
| alfalfa | control | 83 | 35.78 | 681 | 2.17 | 36.08 |
| 10% | 85 | 32.69 | 675 | 2.18 | 35.73 | |
| 20% | 76 | 23.03 | 506 | 2.76 | 24.99 | |
| clover | control | 93 | 37.65 | 776 | 2.29 | 41.29 |
| 10% | 95 | 38.00 | 791 | 2.28 | 42.34 | |
| 20% | 90 | 23.87 | 613 | 2.90 | 30.06 | |
| carrot | control | 39 | 16.46 | 192 | 4.85 | 7.09 |
| 10% | 14 | 11.76 | 35 | 8.20 | 1.70 | |
| 20% | 1 | 12.50 | 3 | 7.50 | 0.12 | |
| wheat | control | 100 | 43.10 | 868 | 1.73 | 52.47 |
| 10% | 89 | 18.39 | 495 | 4.36 | 18.22 | |
| 20% | 66 | 22.53 | 433 | 3.65 | 17.26 | |
| 50% | 9 | 20.93 | 56 | 4.17 | 2.14 |
GP—germination percentage (ISTA, 2015); CVG—coefficient of velocity of germination (Jones and Sanders, 1987); GI—germination index (Bench et al., 1991); t50—median germination time (Farooq et al., 2005); GRI—germination rate index (Esechie, 1994 after modification).
The obtained results for the calculated germination indices in the case of the tested weed species treated with T. vulgaris hydrolate solutions.
| Tested Plant | Concentration | GP (%) | CVG (% Day−1) | GI (−) | t50 (Time) | GRI (%/Day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| red-root | control | 83 | 24.78 | 578 | 2.56 | 30.41 |
| 10% | 26 | 14.86 | 111 | 6.29 | 4.03 | |
| cockspur | control | 22 | 19.47 | 129 | 3.92 | 4.60 |
| 10% | 20 | 15.15 | 88 | 6.33 | 3.30 | |
| 20% | 9 | 15.25 | 40 | 5.75 | 1.47 | |
| 50% | 4 | 17.39 | 21 | 5.33 | 0.71 | |
| common | control | 100 | 38.46 | 840 | 1.88 | 51.41 |
| 10% | 46 | 22.77 | 304 | 3.88 | 13.86 | |
| Johnson grass | control | 23 | 13.30 | 80 | 7.50 | 3.35 |
| 10% | 17 | 12.06 | 46 | 7.90 | 2.10 | |
| 20% | 6 | 11.76 | 15 | 8.00 | 0.71 | |
| 50% | 1 | 11.11 | 2 | 8.50 | 0.11 | |
| common | control | 51 | 20.00 | 306 | 4.19 | 12.95 |
| 10% | 47 | 18.58 | 264 | 4.43 | 9.91 | |
| 20% | 1 | 14.29 | 4 | 6.50 | 0.14 | |
| black nightshade | control | 84 | 13.25 | 290 | 7.68 | 12.16 |
| 10% | 100 | 14.14 | 393 | 6.47 | 15.13 | |
| 20% | 95 | 14.80 | 403 | 6.34 | 15.27 | |
| 50% | 14 | 11.57 | 33 | 8.25 | 1.64 |
GP—germination percentage (ISTA, 2015); CVG—coefficient of velocity of germination (Jones and Sanders, 1987); GI—germination index (Bench et al., 1991); t50—median germination time (Farooq et al., 2005); GRI—germination rate index (Esechie, 1994 after modification).
The shoot and root seedling length of the field and vegetable crop species treated with 10, 20, 50, and 100% T. vulgaris hydrolate solutions.
| Tested Plant | Variable | Shoot Length (mm) | Root Length (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| onion | control | 13.70 ± 10.15 a | 7.65 ± 6.40 a |
| 10% | 6.59 ± 5.69 b | 2.86 ± 2.80 b | |
| 20% | 0.85 ± 1.98 c | 0.59 ± 1.44 c | |
| 50% | 1.08 ± 1.64 c | 0.60 ± 0.98 c | |
| 100% | 0.17 ± 0.53 c | 0.17 ± 0.53 c | |
| maize | control | 25.26 ± 12.87 a | 69.29 ± 25.76 a |
| 10% | 19.49 ± 17.00 b | 54.31 ± 49.06 b | |
| 20% | 13.80 ± 14.75 c | 29.66 ± 28.76 c | |
| 50% | 10.78 ± 14.81 c | 20.09 ± 27.81 d | |
| 100% | 4.87 ± 10.05 d | 5.53 ± 13.48 e | |
| sunflower | control | 34.41 ± 21.64 a | 50.01 ± 38.16 b |
| 10% | 38.00 ± 19.68 a | 64.51 ± 46.27 a | |
| 20% | 29.31 ± 23.66 b | 40.90 ± 41.06 b | |
| 50% | 9.47 ± 7.91 c | 13.18 ± 10.70 c | |
| 100% | 7.32 ± 6.54 c | 12.26 ± 11.13 c | |
| soybean | control | 27.87 ± 13.03 a | 13.92 ± 8.65 b |
| 10% | 14.76 ± 11.18 b | 19.91 ± 19.83 a | |
| 20% | 12.13 ± 9.80 b | 18.56 ± 18.65 a | |
| 50% | 8.94 ± 7.37 c | 11.70 ± 12.40 b | |
| 100% | 7.70 ± 7.41 c | 6.28 ± 6.61 c | |
| wheat | control | 114.12 ± 19.17 a | 114.11 ± 19.14 a |
| 10% | 30.28 ± 26.61 b | 40.36 ± 34.36 b | |
| 20% | 22.47 ± 26.56 c | 22.92 ± 26.09 c | |
| 50% | 3.72 ± 13.82 d | 2.63 ± 9.69 d | |
| carrot | control | 3.65 ± 7.38 a | 4.32 ± 6.95 a |
| 10% | 0.37 ± 1.07 b | 1.65 ± 4.54 b | |
| 20% | 0.04 ± 0.40 b | 0.04 ± 0.40 c | |
| white clover | control | 12.74 ± 4.99 a | 31.85 ± 16.72 a |
| 10% | 9.66 ± 3.47 b | 25.64 ± 10.86 b | |
| 20% | 6.99 ± 3.26 c | 17.17 ± 10.18 c | |
| alfalfa | control | 12.08 ± 7.71 a | 28.51 ± 19.45 a |
| 10% | 10.35 ± 5.35 b | 27.29 ± 17.64 a | |
| 20% | 7.50 ± 5.44 c | 12.46 ± 11.92 b |
The data are mean values ± standard error. a–d Values without the same superscripts within each column differ significantly (p < 0.05).
The shoot and root seedling length of the weed species treated with 10, 20, 50, and 100% T. vulgaris hydrolate solutions.
| Tested Plant | Variable | Shoot Length (mm) | Root Length (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| common purslane | control | 10.49 ± 2.55 a | 19.76 ± 4.53 a |
| 10% | 1.54 ± 1.78 b | 1.71 ± 2.01 b | |
| red-root amaranth | control | 15.61 ± 8.32 a | 14.43 ± 7.72 a |
| 10% | 1.81 ± 3.29 b | 1.96 ± 3.41 b | |
| common | control | 4.12 ± 5.63 a | 7.65 ± 12.77 a |
| 10% | 2.07 ± 3.21 b | 1.89 ± 2.46 b | |
| 20% | - | 0.05 ± 0.50 c | |
| cockspur grass | control | 8.90 ± 17.75 a | 10.70 ± 23.20 a |
| 10% | 6.13 ± 13.74 ab | 4.70 ± 11.07 bc | |
| 20% | 3.08 ± 10.33 bc | 1.47 ± 5.88 b | |
| Johnson grass | control | 10.48 ± 21.54 a | 10.38 ± 22.58 a |
| 10% | 2.38 ± 9.94 bc | 1.78 ± 7.33 bc | |
| 20% | 5.52 ± 15.09 b | 4.81 ± 13.25 b | |
| 50% | 0.42 ± 2.96 c | - | |
| black nightshade | control | 2.57 ± 5.48 c | 9.69 ± 19.86 c |
| 10% | 10.96 ± 3.80 a | 43.88 ± 13.68 a | |
| 20% | 8.77 ± 4.60 b | 19.64 ± 15.25 b | |
| 50% | 1.22 ± 4.17 d | 2.97 ± 9.20 d |
The data are mean values ± standard error. a–d Values without the same superscripts within each column differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The effect of the applied T. vulgaris hydrolate solutions on maize and white clover.
Biochemical analysis of the treated field and vegetable crop species 14 days after the treatment.
| Tested Plant | Variable | LP nmol/g FW | SOD U/g FW | nmol O2.-//g FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| wheat | control | 69.40 ± 16.60 a | 119.09 ± 0.81 a | 58.01 ± 4.06 a |
| 10% | 67.91 ± 8.23 a | 124.46 ± 0.38 b | 89.84 ± 25.86 a | |
| 20% | 48.09 ± 4.86 a | 122.96 ± 0.50 b | 252.08 ± 63.13 ab | |
| 50% | 55.27 ± 8.72 a | 125.39 ± 1.31 b | 319.63 ± 103.44 b | |
| maize | control | 62.00 ± 1.90 a | 120.44 ± 0.14 d | 15.83 ± 3.88 a |
| 10% | 38.66 ± 4.75 a | 118.91 ± 0.21 bc | 34.25 ± 9.08 bc | |
| 20% | 69.25 ± 27.45 a | 119.53 ± 0.42 c | 19.66 ± 3.71 ab | |
| 50% | 63.19 ± 23.16 a | 118.35 ± 0.07 b | 46.38 ± 1.21 c | |
| 100% | 49.51 ± 8.59 a | 116.40 ± 0.00 a | 5.11 ± 0.63 a | |
| sunflower | control | 52.20 ± 5.65 a | 82.66 ± 0.57 c | 57.63 ± 6.15 a |
| 10% | 42.03 ± 10.17 a | 50.60 ± 16.59 ab | 115.60 ± 7.12 b | |
| 20% | 43.00 ± 6.69 a | 33.85 ± 11.59 a | 56.08 ± 16.80 a | |
| 50% | 41.13 ± 4.83 a | 67.20 ± 5.48 bc | 76.26 ± 18.75 ab | |
| 100% | 37.24 ± 6.66 a | 71.64 ± 0.26 bc | 99.39 ± 5.96 b | |
| soybean | control | 95.20 ± 4.59 a | 107.96 ± 0.86 c | 22.38 ± 1.15 ab |
| 10% | 96.92 ± 8.93 a | 24.91 ± 0.99 b | 30.09 ± 1.71 bc | |
| 20% | 97.15 ± 16.08 a | 23.01 ± 4.43 b | 18.21 ± 2.40 a | |
| 50% | 86.53 ± 8.75 a | 10.68 ± 1.05 a | 33.75 ± 5.81 c | |
| 100% | 89.89 ± 24.37 a | 5.69 ± 2.94 a | 19.71 ± 2.77 ab | |
| onion | control | 36.87 ± 5.63 a | 111.58 ± 2.46 a | 90.44 ± 42.56 a |
| 10% | 37.92 ± 8.46 a | 97.41 ± 2.74 a | 290.53 ± 25.37 a | |
| 20% | 35.17 ± 5.62 a | 116.34 ± 14.87 a | 817.26 ± 117.71 b | |
| carrot | control | 18.03 ± 2.20 a | 99.19 ± 6.91 a | 60.83 ± 14.08 a |
| 10% | 18.54 ± 0.81 a | 150.95 ± 14.96 b | 165.92 ± 33.20 b | |
| white clover | control | 43.73 ± 8.47 a | 23.46 ± 2.68 c | 46.48 ± 6.47 b |
| 10% | 38.65 ± 3.78 a | 8.72 ± 0.95 b | 25.45 ± 2.64 a | |
| 20% | 60.90 ± 10.18 a | 2.47 ± 0.63 a | 30.07 ± 4.56 ab | |
| alfalfa | control | 97.48 ± 20.25 ab | 188.94 ± 1.74 b | 17.77 ± 7.08 a |
| 10% | 51.35 ± 11.12 a | 175.61 ± 0.78 a | 24.64 ± 7.01 a | |
| 20% | 115.74 ± 19.05 b | 282.83 ± 1.20 c | 49.91 ± 6.47 b |
The data are mean values ± standard error. a–d Values without the same superscripts within each column differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Biochemical analysis of the treated weed species 14 days after the treatment.
| Tested Plant | Variable | LP nmol/g FW | SOD U/g FW | nmol O2.-//g FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| common | control | 18.48 ± 2.38 a | 79.52 ± 2.91 a | 154.49 ± 8.15 a |
| 10% | 165.73 ± 0.67 b | 334.59 ± 95.64 a | 3366.46 ± 412.48 b | |
| red-root amaranth | control | 43.88 ± 2.81 b | 80.56 ± 3.06 a | 77.48 ± 1.87 a |
| 10% | 31.41 ± 2.42 a | 101.83 ± 10.51 a | 82.48 ± 19.03 a | |
| cockspur grass | control | 37.81 ± 1.41 a | 142.56 ± 7.65 a | 151.52 ± 45.71 a |
| 10% | 32.90 ± 0.20 a | 126.47 ± 8.79 a | 256.70 ± 89.31 a | |
| 20% | 83.96 ± 3.75 b | 313.76 ± 9.55 b | 536.88 ± 20.80 b | |
| black nightshade | control | 48.92 ± 4.32 a | 84.67 ± 2.40 a | 305.66 ± 126.34 a |
| 10% | 48.46 ± 9.95 a | 236.92 ± 58.78 b | 1105.43 ± 9.45 a | |
| 20% | 30.48 ± 2.91 a | 179.82 ± 3.76 ab | 644.68 ± 460.14 a | |
| 50% | 35.23 ± 6.61 a | 100.55 ± 2.79 a | 420.61 ± 85.40 a | |
| Johnson grass | control | 37.40 ± 1.77 ab | 77.59 ± 2.43 a | 224.38 ± 14.53 a |
| 10% | 33.36 ± 0.12 a | 166.76 ± 57.79 ab | 241.64 ± 46.46 a | |
| 20% | 74.51 ± 2.82 c | 337.81 ± 31.68 c | 731.04 ± 290.72 a | |
| 50% | 43.63 ± 2.98 b | 228.08 ± 3.93 b | 338.85 ± 8.69 a |
The data are mean values ± standard error. a–c Values without the same superscripts within each column differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 2GC-FID chromatogram of T. vulgaris hydrolate.