| Literature DB >> 35807182 |
Byoung-Geun Han1, Daewoo Pak2, Jun Young Lee1, Jae-Seok Kim1, Jae-Won Yang1, Ki-Youn Kwon3.
Abstract
Osteopenia, sarcopenia, and increased vascular stiffness are common in patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) with protein energy wasting and can lead to worse clinical outcomes. We investigated the potential moderating role of the lean tissue index (LTI) in the relationship between bone microarchitecture and vascular stiffness in dialysis naïve patients with stage 5 CKD. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for evaluating LTI, lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining the trabecular bone score (TBS), and arterial applanation tonometry measurements for the central augmentation index, at a heart rate of 75 beats/minute (cAIx75), were simultaneously performed in 117 consecutive patients. A hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the moderating effect of LTI on the relationship between TBS and cAIx75 after adjusting for age and sex. The effect of the interaction between LTI and TBS on cAIx75 was statistically significant (p = 0.030), demonstrating that the cAIx75 tends to decrease more, with the joint effect of LTI and TBS. In the separate analyses, the interaction effect was significant only in women (p = 0.048) and the group of diabetes (p = 0.042). Our study suggests that the evaluation of changes in body composition, bone health, and vascular stiffness needs to be performed simultaneously in patients with advanced-stage CKD. Further research in patients with different stages of CKD warranted to generalize and apply our results to patients in other stages.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; bone mineral density; chronic kidney disease; impedance; trabecular bone; vascular stiffness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35807182 PMCID: PMC9267390 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1TBS and LTI according to the tertile distribution of augmentation index at 75. There was a decreasing trend in TBS and LTI, with increasing vascular stiffness.
Comparisons of demographics, bioimpedance parameters, serum chemistry, and bone status according to the tertile distribution of the augmentation index at 75.
| Variables | Total ( | Augmentation Index at 75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | |||
| Augmentation index at 75, % | 76.68 ± 14.37 | 62.03 ± 7.82 | 76.03 ± 3.23 a | 92.76 ± 8.61 b c | <0.001 |
| Age, years | 59.38 ± 14.00 | 56.08 ± 13.65 | 59.49 ± 15.27 | 62.76 ± 12.44 | 0.107 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 63 (53.8%) | 30 (47.6%) | 23 (36.5%) | 10 (15.9%) | <0.001 |
| Female | 54 (46.2%) | 10 (18.5%) | 16 (29.6%) | 28 (51.9%) | |
| Diabetes | |||||
| Yes | 75 (64.1%) | 24 (32.0%) | 28 (37.3%) | 23 (30.7%) | 0.471 |
| No | 42 (35.9%) | 16 (38.1%) | 11 (26.2%) | 15 (35.7%) | |
| TBS, Lumbar spine | 1.37 ± 0.11 | 1.41 ± 0.09 | 1.37 ± 0.11 | 1.32 ± 0.12 b | 0.001 |
| FN-BMD, g/cm2 | 0.64 ± 0.14 | 0.68 ± 0.13 | 0.66 ± 0.13 | 0.59 ± 0.14 b | 0.010 |
| FN-BMD T-score | −1.62 ± 1.16 | −1.34 ± 1.02 | −1.47 ± 1.13 | −2.05 ± 1.24 b | 0.018 |
| LS-BMD, g/cm2 | 0.96 ± 0.18 | 1.00 ± 0.17 | 0.98 ± 0.16 | 0.89 ± 0.19 b | 0.014 |
| LS-BMD T-score | −0.51 ± 1.48 | −0.16 ± 1.42 | −0.35 ± 1.31 | −1.03 ± 1.59 b | 0.023 |
| cBMI, kg/m2 | 24.03 ± 4.15 | 23.50 ± 3.52 | 24.77 ± 4.41 | 23.83 ± 4.47 | 0.371 |
| Height, cm | 161.7 ± 8.61 | 165.1 ± 8.04 | 163.3 ± 8.51 | 156.4 ± 6.74 b c | <0.001 |
| LTI, kg/m2 | 12.28 ± 2.57 | 13.33 ± 2.37 | 11.96 ± 2.36 a | 11.49 ± 2.64 b | 0.004 |
| FTI, kg/m2 | 11.57 ± 4.76 | 10.03 ± 4.07 | 12.62 ± 4.97 a | 12.11 ± 4.93 | 0.036 |
| hs-CRP, mg/dL | 0.71 ± 2.04 | 1.13 ± 3.22 | 0.60 ± 1.24 | 0.40 ± 0.57 | 0.272 |
| iPTH, pg/mL | 348.8 ± 272.2 | 339.9 ± 257.7 | 340.8 ±164.7 | 366.4 ±365.9 | 0.891 |
| Vitamin D3, ng/mL | 15.57 ± 10.11 | 17.09 ± 12.50 | 14.25 ± 7.45 | 15.34 ± 9.71 | 0.456 |
| Total Cholesterol, mg/dL | 139.03 ± 42.72 | 135.70 ± 51.38 | 137.05 ± 37.20 | 144.55 ± 38.34 | 0.622 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 135.60 ± 67.35 | 129.50 ± 59.40 | 128.41 ± 58.68 | 149.39 ± 81.69 | 0.309 |
| ALP, U/L | 82.85 ± 37.74 | 76.55 ± 26.35 | 87.92 ± 37.33 | 84.26 ± 47.23 | 0.395 |
| Calcium, mg/dL | 7.65 ± 1.07 | 7.69 ± 1.02 | 7.60 ± 1.17 | 7.66 ± 1.03 | 0.931 |
| Phosphate, mg/dL | 6.06 ± 1.70 | 5.95 ± 1.77 | 6.02 ± 1.54 | 6.23 ± 1.81 | 0.756 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 6.50 ± 2.33 | 6.70 ± 2.29 | 6.71 ± 2.35 | 6.08 ± 2.36 | 0.401 |
a significant between tertile 1 and tertile 2, b significant between tertile 1 and tertile 3, c significant between tertile 2 and tertile 3. The cAIx75 tertiles 1, 2, and 3 correspond to <70%, 70–81%, and >81%, respectively. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; cBMI, corrected body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FTI, fat tissue index; FN-BMD, femur neck bone mineral density; D.4.0tation index at 75ndex at 75 hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone; LTI, lean tissue index; LS-BMD, lumbar spine bone mineral density; TBS, trabecular bone score.
Figure 2Association between the augmentation index at 75 and (A) TBS (r = –0.321, p < 0.001) and (B) LTI (r = −0.348, p < 0.001).
Correlation between variables.
| Variables | Augmentation Index at 75 | Trabecular Bone Score, | Lean Tissue Index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient | Correlation Coefficient | Correlation Coefficient | ||||
| Age, years | 0.212 | 0.022 | 0.369 | <0.001 | −0.029 | 0.759 |
| cBMI, kg/m2 | −0.023 | 0.802 | −0.305 | 0.001 | 0.055 | 0.556 |
| Height, cm | −0.454 | <0.001 | 0.574 | <0.001 | 0.452 | <0.001 |
| hs-CRP, mg/dL | −0.084 | 0.372 | 0.129 | 0.128 | 0.142 | 0.096 |
| iPTH, pg/mL | 0.109 | 0.242 | 0.084 | 0.326 | 0.145 | 0.088 |
| Vitamin D3, ng/mL | −0.098 | 0.296 | −0.022 | 0.795 | −0.020 | 0.812 |
| Total Cholesterol, mg/dL | 0.052 | 0.579 | −0.010 | 0.029 | 0.048 | 0.572 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 0.102 | 0.276 | −0.135 | 0.114 | −0.158 | 0.065 |
| Alkaline phosphatase, U/L | 0.035 | 0.707 | −0.019 | 0.824 | −0.024 | 0.778 |
| Calcium, mg/dL | 0.021 | 0.824 | 0.024 | 0.778 | 0.112 | 0.190 |
| Phosphate, mg/dL | −0.020 | 0.831 | 0.133 | 0.119 | 0.145 | 0.019 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | −0.053 | 0.569 | 0.023 | 0.788 | 0.050 | 0.561 |
cBMI, corrected body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hs-CRP, high-sensitiity C-reactive protein; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone.
Results of hierarchical moderated regression analysis for testing moderating effects of the LTI for all patients.
| Predictor | Augmentation Index at 75 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted R2 | B | SE |
| ||
|
| 0.259 | ||||
| Age | 3.308 | 1.251 | 0.232 | 0.009 | |
| Sex | 9.818 | 2.867 | 0.344 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| TBS | 0.260 | −1.310 | 1.303 | −0.092 | 0.317 |
| LTI | 0.263 | −2.228 | 1.379 | −0.157 | 0.109 |
|
| |||||
| TBS × LTI | 0.287 | −2.461 | 1.120 | −0.181 | 0.030 |
LTI, lean tissue index; TBS, trabecular bone score.
Results of hierarchical moderated regression analyses for men and women.
| Subgroup | Predictor | Augmentation Index at 75 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted R2 | B | SE |
| |||
| Men |
| |||||
| Age | 0.091 | 4.477 | 1.561 | 0.363 | 0.006 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS | 0.088 | 0.033 | 1.953 | 0.002 | 0.987 | |
| LTI | 0.087 | −0.753 | 1.677 | −0.057 | 0.655 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS × LTI | 0.111 | −3.417 | 2.110 | −0.229 | 0.111 | |
| Women |
| |||||
| Age | 0.026 | 1.832 | 2.029 | 0.143 | 0.371 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS | 0.019 | −3.089 | 2.116 | −0.238 | 0.151 | |
| LTI | 0.014 | −5.336 | 2.825 | −0.311 | 0.065 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS × LTI | 0.073 | −3.738 | 1.845 | −0.347 | 0.048 | |
LTI, lean tissue index; TBS, trabecular bone score.
Results of hierarchical moderated regression analyses for patients with and without diabetes.
| Subgroup | Predictor | Augmentation Index at 75 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted R2 | B | SE |
| |||
| Patients without diabetes |
| 0.099 | ||||
| Age | 3.119 | 2.400 | 0.244 | 0.202 | ||
| Sex | 6.098 | 8.050 | 0.193 | 0.454 | ||
|
| ||||||
| TBS | 0.076 | −1.787 | 3.423 | −0.113 | 0.605 | |
| LTI | 0.053 | −0.792 | 3.928 | −0.050 | 0.841 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS × LTI | 0.069 | −3.480 | 2.703 | −0.215 | 0.206 | |
| Patients with diabetes |
| 0.378 | ||||
| Age | 3.450 | 1.481 | 0.217 | 0.023 | ||
| Sex | 11.486 | 2.899 | 0.421 | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||||
| TBS | 0.385 | −1.709 | 1.297 | −0.128 | 0.192 | |
| LTI | 0.404 | −3.309 | 1.397 | −0.249 | 0.021 | |
|
| ||||||
| TBS × LTI | 0.431 | −2.436 | 1.178 | −0.196 | 0.042 | |
LTI, lean tissue index; TBS, trabecular bone score.
Figure 3Moderations between TBS and LTI for predicting the augmentation index at 75 separately for (A) all patients, (B) women, and (C) patients with diabetes.