| Literature DB >> 35806732 |
Bolesław Szadkowski1, Małgorzata Kuśmierek1, Magdalena Śliwka-Kaszyńska2, Anna Marzec1.
Abstract
Natural dyes were extracted from various plant sources and converted into lake pigments based on aluminum and tin. Three different plants (weld, Persian berries, and Brazilwood) were chosen as representative sources of natural dyes. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (QqQ MS) were used to identify dyestuffs in the raw extracts. The natural dyes and lake pigments were further characterized by optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UV-Vis spectrophotometry, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The stabilization of the studied plant extracts onto aluminum and tin salts led to the formation of natural lake pigments characterized by different color shades. The natural lake pigments showed improved thermal and chemical stability, which was confirmed by their higher degradation temperatures and lower solubility in chemical agents compared to natural dyes extracted from plants. This improvement can be attributed to electrostatic attraction due to the process of chelation. Ethylene-norbornene (EN) composites colored with the lake pigments exhibited uniform color and improved resistance to long-term UV exposure aging. After 300 h of UV exposure, the aging factor of the neat EN copolymer reduced to 0.3, indicating an advanced aging process of polymer compared to colored samples. Prolonged UV exposure deteriorated the mechanical properties of EN by approximately 57%, compared to about 43% with the application of BW/Al lake pigment. Natural lake pigments could be used as effective substitutes for commercial colorants in plastics for packaging applications.Entities:
Keywords: UV aging; lake pigments; pigment stability; plant extracts; polymer coloration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806732 PMCID: PMC9267694 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Conditions of chromatographic separation and detection of the examined dyes.
| Column | Poroshell EC-C18 (3.0 × 150 mm), 2.7 μm, Agilent Technologies | ||
| Column temperature | 40 °C | ||
| Injection volume | 2 µL | ||
| Flow rate | 0.4 mL min−1 | ||
| Eluents | (A) 0.1 % HCOOH in water, | ||
| Gradient program | Time, min | %A | %B |
| 0 | 90 | 10 | |
| 20 | 0 | 100 | |
| 30 | 0 | 100 | |
| UV–Vis detection | Wavelengths: 254, 350 nm | ||
| ESI MS detection | Polarity negative | ||
| Mode | Profile 50–1000 m/z | ||
Figure 1Chromatograms at 254 nm for extracts taken from (a) weld, (b) Persian berries, (c) Brazilwood.
Spectrochromatographic data of components extracted from weld, Persian berries, and Brazilwood.
| Peak No. | tR | [M-H]−, (m/z) | Fragment Ions (m/z) | Elemental Composition | Proposed Identification | λmax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| weld ( | 1 | 9.6 | 593 | 503, 575, 473, 383 | C27H30O15 | apigenin- | 272, 335 |
| 2 | 9.9 | 609 | 447, 285 | C27H30O16 | luteolin- | 268, 336 | |
| 3 | 10.6 | 609 | 447, 285 | C27H30O16 | luteolin-3,7′- | 268, 341 | |
| 4 | 11.3 | 447 | 285, 284 | C21H20O11 | luteolin-7- | 268, 349 | |
| 5 | 12.2 | 447 | 285 | C21H20O11 | luteolin- | 268, 337 | |
| 6 | 12.2 | 431 | 311, 269, 268 | C21H20O10 | apigenin-7- | 266, 348 | |
| 7 | 12.4 | 461 | 341, 299, 284 | C22H22O11 | chryoseriol- | 266, 348 | |
| 8 | 12.8 | 447 | 285 | C21H20O11 | luteolin-4′- | 268, 342 | |
| 9 | 14.2 | 285 | 257, 217, 199, 175, 151 | C15H10O6 | luteolin | 255, 349 | |
| 10 | 15.3 | 269 | 225, 151, 117 | C15H10O5 | apigenin | 267, 337 | |
| 11 | 15.5 | 299 | 284, 256 | C16H12O6 | chryoseriol | 266, 347 | |
| Persian berries ( | 12 | 9.4 | 609 | 447, 285 | C27H30O16 | kaempferol- | 268, 325 |
| 13 | 11.0 | 755 | 609, 463, 301 | C33H40O20 | quercetin- | 256, 356 | |
| 14 | 11.6 | 739 | 593, 447, 285 | C33H40O19 | kaempferol- | 266, 348 | |
| 15 | 11.9 | 609 | 447, 301 | C27H30O16 | quercetin- | 256, 350 | |
| 16 | 12.2 | 447 | 301, 211, 151 | C21H20O11 | quercetin- | 257, 349 | |
| 17 | 13.4 | 769 | 623, 447, 315 | C34H42O20 | rhamnetin- | 257, 357 | |
| 18 | 14.0 | 301 | 232, 151, 121 | C15H10O7 | quercetin | 255, 360 | |
| 19 | 14.2 | 783 | 637, 491, 329, 314 | C35H44O20 | rhamnazin-3- | 256, 356 | |
| 20 | 14.5 | 637 | 329, 314, 299 | C29H34O16 | rhamnazin- | 250, 355 | |
| 21 | 14.8 | 623 | 461, 315 | C28H32O16 | rhamnetin-3- | 257, 347 | |
| 22 | 15.2 | 285 | 257, 151 | C15H10O6 | kaempferol | 266, 354 | |
| 23 | 16.7 | 315 | 300, 272, 244, 165 | C16H12O7 | rhamnetin | 256, 371 | |
| 24 | 18.0 | 299 | 284, 271, 256, 243 | C16H12O6 | rhamnocitrin | 266, 367 | |
| 25 | 18.2 | 329 | 314, 301, 299, 286, 271 | C17H14O7 | rhamnazin | 256, 371 | |
| 26 | 20.1 | 269 | 241, 225, 197 | C15H10O5 | emodin | 252, 286 | |
| Brazilwood | 27 | 8.9 | 283 | 271, 255, 229, 211 | C16H12O5 | brazilein | 290, 440 |
| 28 | 9.3 | 303 | 273, 229 | C16H16O6 | protosappanin B | 287, 255 | |
| 29 | 9.3 | 285 | 163, 135, 121 | C16H14O5 | brazilin | - |
Figure 2Microscopic images of natural lake pigments: (a) PB/Al; (b) BW/Al; (c) W/Al; (d) W/Sn.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopic images of natural lake pigments: (a) PB/Al; (b) BW/Al; (c) W/Al; (d) W/Sn.
Figure 4UV-Vis spectra of solutions of natural lake pigments with (a) ethanol and (b) n-hexane after 24 h of exposure.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric curves (TG/DTG) obtained for: natural dyes (a) and lake pigments (b).
Thermal decomposition temperatures of natural lake pigments (T05, T10, T20, and T50) (standard deviations: T05,10,20,50 ± 3 °C, char residue ± 2%).
| Sample | T05 (°C) | T10 (°C) | T20 (°C) | T50 (°C) | Char Residue 600 °C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW | 130 | 217 | 265 | 424 | 35 |
| PB | 142 | 202 | 241 | 334 | 30 |
| W | 118 | 139 | 190 | 316 | 29 |
| BW/Al | 597 | - | - | - | 95 |
| PB/Al | 239 | - | - | - | 93 |
| W/Al | 174 | - | - | - | 93 |
| W/Sn | 196 | - | - | - | 93 |
T05,10,20,50—decomposition temperatures (5%, 10%, 20%, and 50% of sample mass).
Figure 6UV-Vis-NIR curves for: natural dyes (a,b) natural lake pigments exposed to elevated temperature of 150 °C.
Digital images and color coordinates of EN films colored with natural lake pigments.
| Sample | Image | L | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN |
| 86.52 | 0.58 | 5.06 |
| EN/BW/Al |
| 47.52 | 23.87 | 9.57 |
| EN/PB/Al |
| 65.72 | 3.41 | 53.16 |
| EN/W/Al |
| 72.27 | −6.31 | 40.96 |
| EN/W/Sn |
| 74.85 | −7.31 | 38.09 |
L—lightness; a*—red-green color coordinate; b*—yellow-blue color coordinate.
Figure 7Carbonyl index determined for EN/natural lake pigment composites exposed to UV aging.
Figure A1FTIR spectra of EN/lake pigments composites exposed to different time of UV radiation: (a) neat EN, (b) EN/BW/Al composites, (c) EN/PB/Al composites, (d) EN/W/Sn composites.
Figure 8Mechanical parameters determined for EN/natural lake pigments composites exposed to UV aging: (a) tensile strength and (b) aging cofactor.