| Literature DB >> 30960027 |
Bolesław Szadkowski1, Anna Marzec2, Przemysław Rybiński3, Waldemar Maniukiewicz4, Marian Zaborski5.
Abstract
This study presents the preparation and characterization of new organic-inorganic pigmEntities:
Keywords: aluminum-magnesium hydroxycarbonate; barrier properties; elastomer composites; flame retardancy; hybrid pigments
Year: 2018 PMID: 30960027 PMCID: PMC6401992 DOI: 10.3390/polym11010043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Chemical formulas of azo dyes: (a) Monocarboxylic azo dye (MCD); (b) dicarboxylic azo dye (DCD).
Figure 2Digital photos of prepared hybrid pigments.
Composition of acrylonitrile-butadiene (NBR) and ethylene-propylene (EPM) elastomer blends.
| Materials | Content [phr 1] |
|---|---|
| NBR | 100 |
| Sulfur | 2 |
| Mercaptobenzothiazole | 2 |
| Zinc oxide | 5 |
| Stearic acid | 1 |
| EPM | 100 |
| Dicumyl peroxide | 2 |
| 1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione | 0.5 |
| Hybrid pigment HPM (LH modified with MCD) | 0, 5, 10 |
1 phr: parts per hundred of rubber.
Figure 3Digital photos of NBR and EPM composites containing hybrid pigments.
Interaction coefficients between rubber network and toluene at 25 °C.
| Rubber | μ0 | β |
|---|---|---|
| NBR | 0.381 | 0.671 |
| EPM | 0.501 | 0.273 |
Figure 4XRD powder diffraction patterns for (a) aluminum-magnesium hydroxycarbonate (LH), (b) HPD, (c) HPM, (d) MCD dye.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of studied samples: (a) LH; (b) HPM; (c) HPD.
Elemental analysis of hybrid pigments.
| Sample | %N | %C | %H |
|---|---|---|---|
| LH | - | 1.55; 1.54; 1.52 | 3.20; 3.24; 3.25 |
| HPM | 2.15; 2.18; 2.17 | 9.22; 9.18; 9.25 | 3.37; 3.40; 3.41 |
| HPD | 0.77; 0.83; 0.80 | 7.51; 7.52; 7.50 | 3.40; 3.45; 3.48 |
Figure 6Thermal analysis of studied hybrid pigments: (a) thermogravimetric (TG) and (b) the derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves.
Figure 7Digital photos of azo dye and hybrid pigment powders immersed in various organic solvents.
Figure 8Curing curves for (a) NBR and (b) EPM compounds filled with hybrid pigments.
Curing parameters of NBR and EPM compounds.
| Elastomer Compound | Δ | τ02 3 [min] | τ09 4 [min] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBR | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 7.34 ± 0.01 | 3.57 ± 0.02 | 30.51 ± 0.02 |
| NBR + 5 HPM | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 7.49 ± 0.02 | 3.68 ± 0.02 | 33.61 ± 0.02 |
| NBR + 10 HPM | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 7.01 ± 0.02 | 3.67 ± 0.01 | 34.22 ± 0.01 |
| NBR + 5 HPD | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 8.74 ± 0.01 | 2.60 ± 0.01 | 27.84 ± 0.01 |
| NBR + 10 HPD | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 9.17 ± 0.03 | 2.50 ± 0.02 | 29.98 ± 0.02 |
| EPM | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 6.81 ± 0.01 | 1.54 ± 0.02 | 15.75 ± 0.01 |
| EPM + 5 HPM | 0.86 ± 0.02 | 7.87 ± 0.01 | 1.22 ± 0.02 | 13.23 ± 0.01 |
| EPM+ 10 HPM | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 8.34 ± 0.02 | 1.21 ± 0.03 | 12.59 ± 0.02 |
| EPM + 5 HPD | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 7.34 ± 0.01 | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 14.32 ± 0.01 |
| EPM + 10 HPD | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 8.43 ± 0.02 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 13.09 ± 0.02 |
1 Minimum of torque moment; 2 increments of torque; 3 scorch time; 4 optimum curing time.
Figure 9Crosslink density of (a) NBR and (b) EPM compounds filled with hybrid pigments.
Figure 10Tensile strength of (a) NBR and (b) EPM compounds filled with hybrid pigments.
Figure 11Storage modulus of (a) NBR and (b) EPM composites filled with hybrid pigments as a function of temperature.
Figure 12Loss modulus of (a) NBR and (b) EPM composites filled with hybrid pigments as a function of temperature.
Figure 13Tan δ of (a) NBR and (b) EPM composites filled with hybrid pigments as a function of temperature.
Figure 14Scanning electron micrographs of (a–c) NBR and (d–f) EPM composites filled with 10 phr of hybrid pigment at different magnifications.
Barrier properties of NBR and EPM composites filled with hybrid pigments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTR 1 | 2.24×10−7 | 1.69×10−7 | 4.87×10−8 | 6.49×10−8 | 3.67×10−8 |
| P 2 | 2.46×10−10 | 1.83×10−10 | 5.41×10−11 | 7.14×10−11 | 4.15×10−11 |
| - |
|
|
|
|
|
| GTR | 8.13×10−8 | 7.76×10−8 | 7.03×10−8 | 7.91×10−8 | 6.17×10−8 |
| P | 1.10×10−10 | 9.16×10−11 | 7.73×10−11 | 9.49×10−11 | 7.71×10−11 |
1 Gas transmission rate [mol/(m2∙s∙Pa)]; 2 gas permeability coefficient [mol∙m/(m2∙s∙Pa)].
Figure 15Heat release rate (HRR) curves of (a) NBR and (b) EPM composites, with a heating rate of 1 K/s.
The flammability results recorded from the microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC) microcalorimeter.
| Elastomer Compound | HRRmax1 [W×g−1] | Total HR2 [kJ×g−1] | HR Capacity3 [J×g−1×K−1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| NBR | 1091 ± 55 | 95.5 ± 4.8 | 1059 ± 64 |
| NBR + 5 LH | 894 ± 45 | 66.3 ± 2.7 | 865 ± 29 |
| NBR + 10 LH | 481 ± 29 | 68.0 ± 4.1 | 612 ± 31 |
| NBR + 5 HPM | 599 ± 24 | 49.1 ± 2.5 | 580 ± 23 |
| NBR + 10 HPM | 524 ± 31 | 39.2 ± 1.8 | 509 ± 25 |
| NBR + 5 HPD | 612 ± 31 | 47.6 ± 2.4 | 599 ± 30 |
| NBR + 10 HPD | 384 ± 12 | 46.5 ± 2.3 | 378 ± 15 |
| EPM | 275 ± 8 | 14.8 ± 0.7 | 268 ± 11 |
| EPM + 5 LH | 181 ± 7 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 177 ± 9 |
| EPM + 10 LH | 112 ± 7 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 110 ± 6 |
| EPM + 5 HPM | 146 ± 10 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 142 ± 9 |
| EPM+ 10 HPM | 93 ± 5 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 91 ± 5 |
| EPM + 5 HPD | 149 ± 6 | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 146 ± 7 |
| EPM + 10 HPD | 93 ± 6 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 91 ± 4 |
1 Maximum heat release rate; 2 total heat release; 3 heat release capacity.