| Literature DB >> 35806685 |
Tongyu Zhou1, Jingjing Zhang1, Shenglin Yang1, Junhong Jin1, Biao Wang1, Guang Li1.
Abstract
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) represent an outstanding clean energy alternative for next-generation power sources. The PEMFC's performance is mainly determined by the sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) that occurs in its cathode Therefore, the use of electrocatalysts with high electrocatalytic activity and stability for improving the ORR has been a vital direction for the commercialization of PEMFCs. In this article, porous carbon nanofibers (PCNFs) based on a polyacrylonitrile/polymethyl methacrylate (PAN/PMMA) precursor were fabricated by electrospinning followed by carbonization; then, the PCNFs were mixed together with carbon black (CB) in different mass ratios as a hybrid support for Pt nanoparticles. Pt nanoparticles were deposited on the hybrid support by the ethylene glycol reduction method, and the obtained series of Pt/(PCNF + CB) were used as the oxygen reduction electrocatalyst in the cathode. Their electrocatalytic properties, as well as those of Pt/C as a reference, were investigated by cyclic voltammetry scanning (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The results explained that Pt/(PCNF + CB) showed a higher electrochemical activity area and half-wave potential when the PCNF/CB mass ratio was 3/2 than that of commercial Pt/C. Furthermore, the half-wave potential of Pt/(PCNF + CB) only decreased by 4 mV, which was 86 mV lower than that of commercial Pt/C (90 mV) after 2000 ADT cycles, indicating that the incorporation of PCNFs to form a hybrid support could result in corrosion resistance.Entities:
Keywords: electrocatalytic performance; oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); porous carbon nanofiber (PCNF); proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806685 PMCID: PMC9267471 DOI: 10.3390/ma15134560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1SEM images of PCNF: (a) cross section; (b) surface.
Figure 2SEM images of electrocatalysts: (a) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—20%; (b) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—30%; (c) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—40%; (d) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—50%. TEM images of electrocatalysts: (e) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—20%; (f) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—30%; (g) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—40%; (h) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—50%.
Figure 3TEM images (a,b) and XRD patterns (c) of electrocatalysts.
Figure 4CV and LSV curves of different electrocatalysts: (a) in 0.5 M H2SO4 under the scanning rate of 50 mV s−1; (b) under the scanning rate of 5 mV s−1 and 1600 rpm electrode rotation speed.
Total results of the CV and LSV measurements.
| Electrocatalysts | ECSA (m2/gPt) | Half-Wave Potential (V) | Onset Potential (V) | Limiting Current Density (mA cm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/(PCNF + CB)-20% | 27 | 0.703 | 0.928 | 4.43 |
| Pt/(PCNF + CB)-30% | 54 | 0.756 | 0.945 | 5.34 |
| Pt/(PCNF + CB)-40% | 73 | 0.799 | 0.963 | 5.34 |
| Pt/(PCNF + CB)-50% | 66 | 0.740 | 0.942 | 5.36 |
| Pt/C | 72 | 0.774 | 0.944 | 5.48 |
Figure 5Cyclic voltammetry curves of (a) commercial Pt/C and (c) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—40%; ORR polarization curves of (b) Pt/C and (d) Pt/(PCNF + CB)—40% before and after 2000 potential sweeps; TEM images of electrocatalysts (e) Pt/C and (f) Pt/(PCNF + CB) after 2000 potential sweeps.
Figure 6Galvanostatic discharge curves at 10 mA cm−2 of the indicated catalysts.