| Literature DB >> 35806443 |
Kateřina Štěpánková1, Kadir Ozaltin1, Jana Pelková2,3, Hana Pištěková1, Ilkay Karakurt1, Simona Káčerová1, Marian Lehocky1,4, Petr Humpolicek1,4, Alenka Vesel5, Miran Mozetic5.
Abstract
Surface coatings of materials by polysaccharide polymers are an acknowledged strategy to modulate interfacial biocompatibility. Polysaccharides from various algal species represent an attractive source of structurally diverse compounds that have found application in the biomedical field. Furcellaran obtained from the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis is a potential candidate for biomedical applications due to its gelation properties and mechanical strength. In the present study, immobilization of furcellaran onto polyethylene terephthalate surfaces by a multistep approach was studied. In this approach, N-allylmethylamine was grafted onto a functionalized polyethylene terephthalate (PET) surface via air plasma treatment. Furcellaran, as a bioactive agent, was anchored on such substrates. Surface characteristics were measured by means of contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Subsequently, samples were subjected to selected cell interaction assays, such as antibacterial activity, anticoagulant activity, fibroblasts and stem cell cytocompatibility, to investigate the Furcellaran potential in biomedical applications. Based on these results, furcellaran-coated PET films showed significantly improved embryonic stem cell (ESC) proliferation compared to the initial untreated material.Entities:
Keywords: biopolymer; cell-surface interaction; deposition; furcellaran; polysaccharide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806443 PMCID: PMC9267115 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Schematic representation of plasma postirradiation grafting of N-allylmethylamine onto a PET surface followed by immobilization of FUR or κ-CA polysaccharide.
Contact angles (θ) (w: deionized water; d: diiodomethane; f: formamide) and surface free energy parameters of probe liquids used in the acid-base method (γg total surface fee energy, apolar γsLW, polar γsAB, Lewis acid γs+ and base γs- components). PET is the virgin polyethylene terephthalate sample, PET_DC is the PET sample treated in discharge and PET_MAAM is the PET_DC sample after grafting with N-allylmethylamine. MAAM_1000, MAAM_8500 and MAAM_KAPA are samples in which selected polysaccharides were immobilized on the PET_MAAM sample. DC_1000, DC_8500 and DC_KAPA indicate samples in which selected polysaccharides were immobilized on the PET_DC sample.
| Contact Angles (°) for Liquids | Surface Free Energy Parameters (mJ/m2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMPLE | θw | θd | θf | γs | γsLW | γsAB | γs+ | γs− |
| PET | 63.27 ± 3.08 | 26.63 ± 0.54 | 53.72 ± 0.95 | 50.17 | 45.55 | 4.62 | 0.24 | 22.10 |
| PET_DC | 30.25 ± 3.40 | 25.57 ± 0.61 | 8.97 ± 1.15 | 57.64 | 45.95 | 11.72 | 0.88 | 38.80 |
| PET_MAAM | 33.71 ± 1.83 | 30.76 ± 0.38 | 12.22 ± 2.62 | 57.08 | 43.90 | 13.18 | 1.22 | 35.70 |
| MAAM_1000 | 40.94 ± 1.74 | 27.78 ± 2.91 | 17.8 ± 2.81 | 56.28 | 45.11 | 11.17 | 1.07 | 29.27 |
| MAAM_8500 | 47.33 ± 1.95 | 32.02 ± 2.36 | 20.18 ± 2.05 | 55.32 | 43.36 | 11.96 | 1.59 | 22.52 |
| MAAM_KAPA | 49.19 ± 2.0 | 28.16 ± 1.15 | 18.73 ± 2.28 | 56.11 | 44.98 | 11.13 | 1.55 | 20.02 |
| DC_1000 | 36.75 ± 1.35 | 18.06 ± 1.55 | 12.08 ± 2.03 | 57.98 | 48.33 | 9.65 | 0.71 | 32.62 |
| DC_8500 | 47.08 ± 2.25 | 21.67 ± 0.80 | 10.99 ± 1.46 | 58.35 | 47.27 | 11.07 | 1.49 | 20.61 |
| DC_KAPA | 46.71 ± 0.99 | 26.82 ± 1.94 | 11.28 ± 1.69 | 57.72 | 45.48 | 12.24 | 1.79 | 20.97 |
Surface elemental compositions of the samples (%) from XPS measurements.
| SAMPLE | C | N | O | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | 74.6 | 25.4 | ||
| PET_DC | 69.3 | 1.5 | 29.3 | |
| PET_MAAM | 69.8 | 2.1 | 28.1 | |
| MAAM_8500 | 73.7 | 1.0 | 25.3 | |
| MAAM_1000 | 74.6 | 1.0 | 24.5 | |
| MAAM_KAPA | 74.2 | 0.9 | 24.8 | 0.2 |
| DC_1000 | 70.0 | 29.7 | 0.3 | |
| DC_8500 | 73.9 | 0.6 | 25.5 | 0.1 |
| DC_KAPA | 72.7 | 0.7 | 26.5 | 0.1 |
Figure 2SEM images of (a) untreated PET, (b) PET_DC, (c) DC_MAAM, (d) MAAM_1000, (e) MAAM_8500, (f) MAAM_KAPA, (g) DC_1000, (h) DC_8500 and (i) DC_KAPA.
Viable bacteria numbers on PET surfaces; antibacterial effect (R) values are expressed in CFU.
| SAMPLE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (cfu/cm2) | R | N (cfu/cm2) | R | |
| PET | 1.1 × 104 | 0 | 9.8 × 105 | 0 |
| PET_DC | 1.1 × 104 | −0.02 | 8.9 × 105 | 0.05 |
| PET_MAAM | 1.1 × 104 | −0.02 | 8.3 × 105 | 0.07 |
| MAAM_1000 | 1.2 × 104 | −0.04 | 5.8 × 105 | 0.22 |
| MAAM_8500 | 1.2 × 104 | −0.05 | 8.6 × 105 | 0.05 |
| MAAM_KAPA | 4.6 × 103 | 0.38 | 9.5 × 105 | 0.01 |
| DC_1000 | 8.1 × 103 | 0.14 | 8.2 × 105 | 0.07 |
| DC_8500 | 2.4 × 104 | −0.34 | 7.1 × 105 | 0.14 |
| DC_KAPA | 8.6 × 103 | 0.11 | 5.8 × 105 | 0.12 |
Anticoagulation activity results; PT: prothrombin time; aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; TT: thrombin time.
| SAMPLE | PT (s) | aPTT (s) | TT (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PET | 12.0 | 29.1 | 18.0 |
| PET_DC | 12.6 | 32.8 | 20.1 |
| PET_MAAM | 12.6 | 30.5 | 18.5 |
| MAAM_1000 | 12.1 | 28.8 | 18.4 |
| MAAM_8500 | 12.4 | 30.6 | 18.6 |
| MAAM_KAPA | 12.3 | 29.7 | 18.9 |
| DC_1000 | 13.0 | 32.5 | 18.7 |
| DC_8500 | 13.3 | 33.4 | 19.7 |
| DC_KAPA | 12.3 | 33.9 | 20.5 |
Figure 3Relative cell viability of cells incubated with PET films coated with furcellaran of different water gel strengths (1000, 8500) and κ-carrageenan tested on a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line (NIH/3T3).
Figure 4Fibroblast proliferation on examined samples: (a) untreated PET, (b) PET_DC, (c) DC_MAAM, (d) MAAM_1000, (e) MAAM_8500, (f) MAAM_KAPA, (g) DC_1000, (h) DC_8500 and (i) DC_KAPA.
Figure 5Cell viability of individual samples. The dashed line highlights the limit of viability according to EN ISO 10993-5: viability < 0.7 corresponds to a cytotoxic effect. (A) Comparison of reference (cells on TPP plastic) and PET; (B) Comparison of reference (cells on TPP plastic coated with gelatine) and PET coated with gelatine; (C) Comparison of PET as a reference and samples; (D) Comparison of PET coated with gelatine as a reference and samples also coated with gelatine. Data are reported as the means and standard deviations from a minimum of four independent experiments. To determine significant differences between samples ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test was used; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6Mouse embryonic cells (Line R1) on (A) PET uncoated with 0.1% gelatine and (B) DC 8500 uncoated with 0.1% gelatine after 120 h of cultivation.