| Literature DB >> 31035326 |
Kadir Ozaltin1, Marian Lehocky2, Petr Humpolicek3, Jana Pelkova4,5, Antonio Di Martino6, Ilkay Karakurt7, Petr Saha8.
Abstract
Biomaterial-based blood clot formation is one of the biggest drawbacks of blood-contacting devices. To avoid blood clot formation, their surface must be tailored to increase hemocompatibility. Most synthetic polymeric biomaterials are inert and lack bonding sites for chemical agents to bond or tailor to the surface. In this study, polyethylene terephthalate was subjected to direct current air plasma treatment to enhance its surface energy and to bring oxidative functional binding sites. Marine-sourced anticoagulant sulphated polysaccharide fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus was then immobilized onto the treated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) surface at different pH values to optimize chemical bonding behavior and therefore anticoagulant performance. Surface properties of samples were monitored using the water contact angle; chemical analyses were performed by FTIR and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and their anticoagulant activity was tested by means of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin time. On each of the fucoidan-immobilized surfaces, anticoagulation activity was performed by extending the thrombin time threshold and their pH 5 counterpart performed the best result compared to others.Entities:
Keywords: anticoagulant; blood coagulation; fucoidan; plasma treatment; polyethylene terephthalate; surface coating
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035326 PMCID: PMC6572684 DOI: 10.3390/polym11050750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Chemical structure of fucoidan.
Figure 2Experimental scheme.
Water contact angle values of the samples.
| Samples | Contact Angle (°) |
|---|---|
| PET | 70.6 ± 0.60 |
| PET_DC | 22.09 ± 1.32 |
| FU3 | 43.21 ± 2.67 |
| FU4 | 39.08 ± 1.74 |
| FU5 | 42.61 ± 2.92 |
| FU6 | 39.74 ± 5.52 |
| FU7 | 42.54 ± 7.45 |
Figure 3Surface morphology of fucoidan immobilized surfaces at various pH values: (a) PET; (b) PET_DC; (c) FU3; (d) FU4; (e) FU5; (f) FU6; (g) FU7.
Figure 4Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FTIR spectrum collected from the samples.
Collected elemental compositions in atomic percentages of the samples by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
| Samples | C1s | O1s | N1s | S2p | O1s/C1s | N1s/C1s | S2p/C1s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | 69.7 | 30.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.435 | 0 | 0 |
| PET_DC | 58.4 | 40.9 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.700 | 0.012 | 0 |
| FU3 | 63.4 | 35.7 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.563 | 0 | 0.003 |
| FU4 | 63.7 | 34.5 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 0.542 | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| FU5 | 63.6 | 34.4 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 0.541 | 0.003 | 0.028 |
| FU6 | 63.7 | 35.7 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.560 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| FU7 | 63.8 | 35.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.558 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
Anticoagulation activity results; PT: prothrombin time (s); aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time (s); TT: thrombin time (s).
| Samples | PT | aPTT | TT |
|---|---|---|---|
| PET | 12.6 | 26.3 | 15.5 |
| PET_DC | 10.9 | 22 | 15.2 |
| FU3 | 11.3 | 29.4 | 34.7 |
| FU4 | 11 | 35.1 | 88.7 |
| FU5 | 10.9 | 35.1 | 100+ |
| FU6 | 11.1 | 30.8 | 58.6 |
| FU7 | 11.2 | 31.5 | 60.7 |
Figure 5Anticoagulant activity results: (a) PT: prothrombin time (s); (b) aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin time (s); (c) TT: thrombin time (s).