| Literature DB >> 35805970 |
Lei Wang1, Yang Gao1, Nihao Jiang1, Jian Yan1, Weipeng Lin2, Kunzheng Cai1,3.
Abstract
Silicon (Si) has a multifunctional role in improving plant growth and enhancing plant disease resistance, but its mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the impacts of silicon application on the control of bacterial wilt and elucidated the molecular mechanisms using transcriptome sequencing. Compared to non-Si treatment, Si application (0.5-2 mM) significantly reduces tomato bacterial wilt index by 46.31-72.23%. However, Si does not influence the growth of R. solanacearum. Si application negatively influences R. solanacearum exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis and biofilm formation. Transcriptome analysis showed that Si treatment significantly downregulates the expression of virulence genes' transcriptional regulator (xpsR), EPS synthesis-related genes (epsD and tek), and type III effectors (HrpB2, SpaO, and EscR) in R. solanacearum. In addition, Si remarkably upregulates the expression of twitch motor-related genes (pilE2, pilE, fimT, and PilX). These findings suggest that silicon-suppressed tomato wilt incidence may be due to the regulation of the virulence-related genes of R. solanacearum by Si. Our research adds new knowledge to the application of Si in the field of disease control.Entities:
Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum; bacterial wilt; biofilm; silicon; tomato; virulence-related genes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805970 PMCID: PMC9266643 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23136965
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Effects of Si concentration on the disease index of bacterial wilt in tomato. (a) Effects of different Si concentrations on tomato plants under R. solanacearum inoculation conditions. (b) Disease index at 20 days post inoculation (dpi). (c) The simple linear regression (solid line) and 95% confidence interval of the regression (dashed line) for the disease index at 20 dpi and Si concentration in peat soil. Different letters among treatments denote statistical difference at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s new multiple range tests.
Figure 2Effects of different Si concentrations on the growth curve of R. solanacearum. (a) The growth curve of R. solanacearum in liquid LB medium. (b) The growth curve of R. solanacearum in liquid MM medium.
Figure 3Gene expression changes and associated significant values across different treatments. Scatter plot (a) and volcano plot (b). Green dots represent significantly downregulated genes {Log2FPKM(Si)/FPKM(CK) > 2 and Log10FDR [FPMK (Si)/FPKM (CK)]) < 0.05}; red dots represent significantly upregulated genes {Log2FPKM(Si)/FPKM(CK) < −2 and Log10FDR [FPMK (Si)/FPKM (CK)]) < 0.05}; blue dots represent no DEGs.
Figure 4KEGG pathway of DEGs. (a) DEGs in the ABC transporter pathway. (b) DEGs in the two-component system. (c) DEGs in the bacterial chemotaxis pathway. (d) DEGs in the quorum sensing pathway. Red: upregulated by Si treatment; Green: downregulated by Si treatment.
Figure 5Effects of exogenous silicon on the relative expression of virulence-related genes of R. solanacearum. (a) xpsR (transcriptional regulator). (b) epsD (the genes coding for EPS). (c) pilE (the genes coding for twitching motility). (d) fimT (the genes coding for swimming motility). CK: non-Si treatment; Si: Si treatment. “ns” indicates not significant (p > 0.05), * and ** indicate significant difference among treatments at p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01 in t-test.
Figure 6Effects of Si application on EPS concentration and biofilm formation of R. solanacearum. EPS concentration (a) and biofilm formation (b); CK: non-Si treatment; Si: Si treatment. ** indicates significant difference among treatments at p ≤ 0.01 in t-test.