| Literature DB >> 35805381 |
Ismarulyusda Ishak1,2, Nurul Najwa Abdul Rahim1, Noor Idaya Salim1, Cut Ulfah Nihayati Sholeha Teuku Husaini1, Izzati Jamaludin1, Hafidzoh Mohamad Khalid1, Nur Adeena Ahmad Lutfi1, Sayyidah Syathiroh Afzaruddin1, Ahmad Rohi Ghazali1,2, Arimi Fitri Mat Ludin1,3, Nor Malia Abd Warif1,2, Farah Wahida Ibrahim1,2, Faisal Ariffin Othman1, Normah Che Din4,5, Dzalani Harun5,6, Hanis Mastura Yahya3,7, Wan Nor Atikah Che Wan Mohd Rozali1,2.
Abstract
The increase in the number of Tahfiz schools in Malaysia indicates a high demand from the community for Tahfiz education. Tahfiz schools provide a Quran memorization syllabus as the main part of the curriculum at the primary and secondary levels. There is no holistic module that combines learning and health for Tahfiz students in Malaysia. Huffaz ProHealth 1.0© Module is a health intervention module developed explicitly for Tahfiz students by a group of researchers from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur (UKMKL). The module encompasses educational and motivational components for the Tahfiz students, and acts as a guide for their teachers and staff to improve the students' health and quality of life. The module consists of three components: physical health, nutritional and psychological well-being. Each component is divided into several units with specific activities. The Sidek Module Development Model (SDMM) was used as a reference model. The study involved two phases: the development (Phase I) and evaluation (Phase II). In Phase I, a needs assessment was conducted among students and teachers from Tahfiz schools to evaluate their knowledge, attitude, and practice on the related topics. Meanwhile, the module's validity and feasibility were assessed by healthcare experts and Tahfiz teachers in Phase II. The item-content validity index (I-CVI), content validity value, Tool to Evaluate Materials used in Patient Education (TEMPtEd) score, and expert feedback were evaluated. In conclusion, the Huffaz ProHealth 1.0© module was successfully developed and evaluated. Strong validity values were observed in all components, indicating high suitability to be employed at Tahfiz schools.Entities:
Keywords: Tahfiz school; health intervention; module development; nutritional; physical health; psychological well-being
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35805381 PMCID: PMC9265862 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Sidek Module Development Model.
Content validity calculation and effectiveness statistical analysis.
| Part | Calculation Method | Formula/Statistical Analysis | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Item-level Content Validity Index |
| Polit et al., (2007) [ |
| II | Content Validity Level |
| Sidek & Jamaludin (2005) [ |
| III | Effectiveness of Module | Generalized Linear Model-Mixed Design ANOVA | - |
Demographic data of Tahfiz school students and Tahfiz school teachers.
| Demographic Data of Tahfiz School Students | ||
|---|---|---|
| Demographic Data | Category | Frequency, |
| Age (years) | 12 | 1 (5 %) |
| 13 | 4 (20%) | |
| 14 | 3 (15%) | |
| 15 | 9 (45%) | |
| 16 | 2 (10%) | |
| 17 | 1 (5%) | |
| Tahfiz school | Maahad Tahfiz A | 20 (100%) |
| Study period (years) | 0–3 | 15 (75%) |
| 4–6 | 4 (20%) | |
| >6 | 1 (5%) | |
| Level of Al-Quran memorization (juzuk) | 0–10 | 12 (60%) |
| 11–20 | 7 (35%) | |
| 12–30 | 1 (5%) | |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 20–29 | 7 (58.33%) |
| 30–39 | 4 (33.33%) | |
| 40–49 | 1 (8.33%) | |
| Tahfiz school | Maahad Tahfiz B | 6 (50%) |
| Maahad Tahfiz C | 6 (50%) | |
| Teaching experience (years) | 0–3 | 5 (41.67%) |
| 4–6 | 4 (33.33%) | |
| 7–9 | 2 (16.67%) | |
| >9 | 1 (8.33%) | |
| Education level | Secondary/religious school | 5 (41.67%) |
| Diploma/STPM/Certificates | 4 (33.33%) | |
| Degree | 2 (16.67%) | |
| Others | 1 (8.33%) | |
Tahfiz school students and teachers’ responses to the physical health, healthy diet, and psychological well-being questions.
| Tahfiz School Students and Teacher’s Responses on the Physical Health Aspect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Teachers | Students | ||
| Response | Response | |||
| Understanding of physical health | Healthy, no chronic diseases | 2 (16.7%) | Active/healthy lifestyle practice | 9 (45.0%) |
| Exercise is | Yes | 12 (100%) | Yes | 17 (85.0%) |
| Benefits of healthy physical activity | Body sweating | 2 (16.7%) | Prevent diseases | 1 (5.0%) |
| Practice on | Yes | 10 (50.0%) | ||
| Time spent for exercise in a week (hours) | <1 | 4 (20.0%) | ||
| Exercise affect Al-Quran | Yes | 12 (100%) | Yes | 12 (60.0%) |
| Effect of exercise on Al-Quran memorization? | Maintain body fitness | 3 (25.0%) | Make the body healthy and fit | |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Understanding of healthy diet | Nutritious | 5 (41.7%) | Helps in memorization | 3 (15.0%) |
| A healthy diet is essential for health, learning and | Agree | 12 (100%) | Agree | 18 (90.0%) |
| Selection and consumption of a healthy diet | Yes | 12 (100%) | Yes | 18 (90.0%) |
| Effects of a healthy diet on the performance of memorization | Improve memorization performance | 8 (66.7%) | Helps in memorization | 8 (40.0%) |
| Practice on a healthy diet | Yes | 5 (41.7%) | Yes | 4 (20.0%) |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Emotion affects Students’ | Yes | 12 (100%) | Yes | 13 (65.0%) |
| Effects of | Difficult memorization affects | 2 (16.7%) | Emotion would affect memorization | 7 (35.0%) |
| Students’ | Yes | 12 (100%) | Yes | 16 (80.0%) |
| Effects of | Good relationship stabilizes emotion | 5 (41.7%) | A good relationship leads to success | |
| Students’ | Never | 2 (16.7%) | Never | 5 (25.0%) |
| Actions taken by students when sad or angry | Express to teachers/friends | 4 (33.3%) | Adding spiritual practice | 6 (30.0%) |
Demographic data.
| Demographic Data | Experts ( | Teachers ( |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 1 (20%) | 6 (85.7%) |
| Female | 4 (80%) | 1 (14.3%) |
| Education backgrounds | ||
| Diploma | - | 2 (28.6%) |
| Bachelor’s degree | - | 3 (42.9%) |
| Master’s degree | - | 1 (14.3%) |
| Doctor of Philosophy | 5 (100%) | 1 (14.3%) |
Content validity index for each item of each component in the Huffaz ProHealth 1.0© module.
| Component | I–CVI | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Deep breathing exercises | 0.92 | Accepted |
| Correct body posture | 1.00 | Accepted |
| Stretching exercises | 0.92 | Accepted |
| Eye exercises | 1.00 | Accepted |
| Muscle resistance exercises | 1.00 | Accepted |
|
| ||
| Quarter quarter half concept | 1.00 | Accepted |
| Food pyramid | 1.00 | Accepted |
| Food hygiene and safety | 1.00 | Accepted |
| Healthy menu planning | 0.92 | Accepted |
|
| ||
| Time and stress management seminars | 0.92 | Accepted |
| Tahfiz peer mentor | 0.75 | Accepted |
| Feelings expression box | 0.92 | Accepted |
| Counseling on demand | 0.83 | Accepted |
Module criterion assessment (TEMPtED).
| Component | Mean ± SD | CVI (%) | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Content | 21.33 ± 3.60 | 79.00 | Accepted |
| Principle of motivation | 4.75 ± 1.21 | 79.00 | Accepted |
| Literacy | 9.83 ± 1.70 | 81.94 | Accepted |
| Layout and typography | 12.75 ± 2.22 | 85.00 | Accepted |
| Graphic | 7.75 ± 1.42 | 86.11 | Accepted |
|
| |||
| Content | 22.58 ± 3.87 | 83.64 | Accepted |
| Principle of motivation | 4.58 ± 0.90 | 76.39 | Accepted |
| Literacy | 10.00 ± 1.86 | 83.33 | Accepted |
| Layout and typography | 10.08 ± 1.73 | 67.22 | Not accepted |
| Graphic | 7.83 ± 1.40 | 87.04 | Accepted |
|
| |||
| Content | 16.50 ± 3.12 | 61.11 | Not accepted |
| Principle of motivation | 4.33 ± 1.23 | 72.22 | Accepted |
| Literacy | 10.50 ± 1.88 | 87.50 | Accepted |
| Layout and typography | 12.17 ± 2.29 | 81.11 | Accepted |
| Graphic | 7.42 ± 1.50 | 82.41 | Accepted |
Assessment of feasibility expectations by experts.
| Component | Agree (%) | Strongly Agree (%) | Mean ± SD | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical health | 41.67 | 58.33 | 2.58 ± 0.51 | Accepted |
| Nutrition | 41.67 | 58.33 | 2.58 ± 0.51 | Accepted |
| Psychological well-being | 33.33 | 66.67 | 2.67 ± 0.51 | Accepted |