| Literature DB >> 35804993 |
Vlad Cristian Munteanu1,2,3, Raluca Andrada Munteanu3,4, Diana Gulei4, Radu Mărginean4, Vlad Horia Schițcu1, Anca Onaciu3,4, Valentin Toma4, Gabriela Fabiola Știufiuc5, Ioan Coman2,6, Rareș Ionuț Știufiuc4,7.
Abstract
It is possible to obtain diagnostically relevant data on the changes in biochemical elements brought on by cancer via the use of multivariate analysis of vibrational spectra recorded on biological fluids. Prostate cancer and control groups included in this research generated almost similar SERS spectra, which means that the values of peak intensities present in SERS spectra can only give unspecific and limited information for distinguishing between the two groups. Our diagnostic algorithm for prostate cancer (PCa) differentiation was built using principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) analysis of spectral data, which has been widely used in spectral data management in many studies and has shown promising results so far. In order to fully utilize the entire SERS spectrum and automatically determine the most meaningful spectral features that can be used to differentiate PCa from healthy patients, we perform a multivariate analysis on both the entire and specific spectral intervals. Using the PCA-LDA model, the prostate cancer and control groups are clearly distinguished in our investigation. The separability of the following two data sets is also evaluated using two alternative discrimination techniques: principal least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and principal component analysis-support vector machine (PCA-SVM).Entities:
Keywords: Raman; SERS; multivariate analysis; prostate cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804993 PMCID: PMC9264810 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Clinical data of patients group.
| Number of Patients: 29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | |||
| Min. | Max. | Mean | |
| 52 | 68 | 61 | |
| PSA (ng/mL) | |||
| Min. | Max. | Mean | |
| 5.8 | 39.82 | 13.36 | |
| Pre-operative Gleason Score | |||
| 6 | 9 patients | ||
| 7(3 + 4) | 12 patients | ||
| 7(4 + 3) | 5 patients | ||
| 8 | 1 patient | ||
| 9 | 2 patients | ||
| Post-operative Gleason Score | |||
| N+ | 2 patients | ||
| M+ | 0 patients | ||
| L+ | 2 patients | ||
| R+ | 4 patients | ||
Legend: N+ (node positive); M+ (positive metastases); L+ (lymphatic invasion); R+ (tumoral margins).
Figure 1The average SERS plasmatic spectra obtained from PCa patients (n = 27, blue spectrum) and healthy donors (n = 14, green spectrum), using a 785 nm laser.
Figure 2The average serum SERS spectra of PCa patients (n = 29, magenta spectrum) and healthy donors (n = 14, green spectrum), using a 785 nm laser.
PCA-LDA results on plasma and serum samples.
| Sample | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | Specificity | True Pos. | True Neg. | False Pos. | False Neg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 87.8% | 86.7% | 96.3% | 71.4% | 26 | 10 | 4 | 1 |
| Serum | 97.7% | 100.0% | 96.6% | 100.0% | 28 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
PCA-LDA results on plasma and serum samples for 1200–1700 cm−1 spectral region.
| Sample | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | Specificity | True Pos. | True Neg. | False Pos. | False Neg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 80.5% | 85.2% | 85.2% | 71.4% | 23 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| Serum | 93.0% | 96.4% | 93.1% | 92.9% | 27 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
Figure 3Score-score plots for the first two principal components obtained from plasma and serum samples LOOCV analysis.
PLSDA results on plasma and serum samples.
| Sample | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | Specificity | True Pos. | True Neg. | False Pos. | False Neg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 90.2% | 89.7% | 96.3% | 78.6% | 26 | 11 | 3 | 1 |
| Serum | 95.3% | 100.0% | 93.1% | 100.0% | 27 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
Figure 4Mean spectra with emphasized t-test significance and VIP > 1 for plasma samples.
Figure 5Mean spectra with emphasized t-test significance and VIP > 1 for serum samples.