| Literature DB >> 35804461 |
Akua Obeng Forson1, Isaac A Hinne2, Shittu B Dhikrullahi2, Isaac Kwame Sraku2, Abdul Rahim Mohammed2, Simon K Attah2, Yaw Asare Afrane3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa there is widespread use of long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying to help control the densities of malaria vectors and decrease the incidence of malaria. This study was carried out to investigate the resting behavior, host preference and infection with Plasmodium falciparum of malaria vectors in Ghana in the context of the increasing insecticide resistance of malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles gambiae sensu lato; Ghana; Human blood index; Insecticide resistance; Resting behavior; Sporozoite rates
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804461 PMCID: PMC9270803 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05355-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 4.047
Fig. 1Map of Ghana showing the locations of the study sites
Resting densities of mosquitoes collected from different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Site | Mosquito species | Indoors [no. (%)] | Outdoors [no. (%)] | Total (no.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kpalsogou (Sahel savannah zone) | 184 (13.41) | 1188 (86.59) | 1372 | |
| 0 | 22 (100) | 22 | ||
| 0 | 158 (100) | 158 | ||
| Pagaza (Sahel savannah zone) | 8 (7.69) | 96 (92.31) | 104 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Libga (Sahel savannah zone) | 38 (50) | 38 (50) | 76 | |
| 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 4 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Anyakpor (Coastal savannah zone) | 44 (84.62) | 8 (15.38) | 52 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 4 (100) | 4 | ||
| Konongo (Forest zone) | 76 (66.67) | 38 (33.33) | 114 | |
| 0 | 4 (100) | 4 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total | 350 (20.37) | 1368 (79.63) | 1718 | |
| 2 (6.67) | 28 (93.33) | 30 | ||
| 0 | 162 (100) | 162 |
s.l. Sensu lato
Total numbers of mosquitoes collected from different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana during the dry and rainy seasons
| Season | Location | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Kpalsogou | 910 | 0 | 144 | 1054 |
| Pagaza | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
| Libga | 32 | 0 | 0 | 32 | |
| Anyakpor | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| Konongo | 104 | 0 | 0 | 104 | |
| Subtotal (%) | 1070 (62.3) | 0 | 144 (88.9) | 1214 | |
| Rainy | Kpalsogou | 462 | 22 | 14 | 498 |
| Pagaza | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | |
| Libga | 44 | 4 | 0 | 48 | |
| Anyakpor | 38 | 0 | 4 | 42 | |
| Konongo | 10 | 4 | 0 | 14 | |
| Subtotal (%) | 648 (37.7) | 30 (100) | 18 (11.1) | 696 | |
| Total | 1718 (100) | 30 (100) | 162 (100) | 1910 | |
Fig. 2Seasonal composition of resting Anopheles (An.) species in the dry season and rainy season in different sites of three ecological zones of Ghana
Proportions of members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex resting indoors and outdoors at different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Species | Locations | Total (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kpalsogou | Pagaza | Libga | Anyakpor | Konongo | |||||||
| Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | ||
| Dry season | |||||||||||
| 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 (8.1) | |
| 36 | 56 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 54 | 8 | 174 (64) | |
| 2 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 4 | 76 (27.9) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total (%) | 38 (14) | 88 (32.4) | 2 (0.7) | 10 (3.7) | 10 (3.7) | 24 (8.8) | 2 (0.73) | 2 (0.7) | 84 (30.9) | 12 (4.4) | 272 |
| Rainy season | |||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 (10.5) | |
| 22 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 166 (62.4) | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 68 (25.6) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 (1.5) | |
| Total (%) | 34 (12.8) | 34 (12.8) | 20 (7.5) | 72 (27.1) | 20 (7.5) | 20 (7.5) | 32 (12.0) | 16 (6.0) | 10 (3.8) | 8 (3.0) | 266 |
Frequency of the kdr L1014F mutation in members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex at different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Site | Location | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. tested | RS | RR | F( | No. tested | RS | RR | F( | No. tested | RS | RR | F( | No. tested | RS | RR | F( | ||
| Kpalsogou | Indoor | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 58 | 12 | 46 | 0.9 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1 | ||||
| Outdoor | 16 | 4 | 12 | 0.9 | 82 | 26 | 56 | 0.8 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 0.9 | |||||
| Total | 22 | 140 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
| Pagaza | Indoor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 0.9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | ||||
| Outdoor | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0.8 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 0.7 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 0.9 | |||||
| Total | 8 | 70 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
| Libga | Indoor | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0.8 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 0.8 | ||||
| Outdoor | 14 | 4 | 10 | 0.9 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 1.0 | |||||
| Total | 20 | 14 | 40 | ||||||||||||||
| Anyakpor | Indoor | 32 | 4 | 28 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | ||||
| Outdoor | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Total | 44 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Konongo | Indoor | 60 | 24 | 36 | 0.8 | 34 | 16 | 18 | 0.8 | ||||||||
| Outdoor | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0.8 | |||||||||
| Total | 72 | 42 | |||||||||||||||
RR Homozygote resistant, RS heterozygote resistant, F frequency
Frequencies of ace1 mutation of Anopheles gambiae s.l. at different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Site | Species | Total No. Tested | No. Tested | Genotype | F ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS | GG | SS | ||||||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | |||||||
| Kpalsogou | 22 | 6 | Indoor | 4 (18.2) | 2 (9.1) | 0 | 0.3 | |
| 16 | Outdoor | 6 (27.3) | 10 (45.5) | 0 | 0.2 | |||
| 140 | 58 | Indoor | 44 (31.4) | 14 (10) | 0 | 0.4 | ||
| 82 | Outdoor | 64 (45.7) | 18(12.9) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| 32 | 8 | Indoor | 4 (25) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | ||
| 24 | Outdoor | 18 (56.3) | 6 (18.8) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| Pagaza | 8 | 0 | Indoor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 8 | Outdoor | 8 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | |||
| 70 | 20 | Indoor | 14 (20) | 6 (8.6) | 0 | 0.4 | ||
| 50 | Outdoor | 42 (60) | 8 (11.4) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| 26 | 2 | Indoor | 2 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | ||
| 24 | Outdoor | 20 (76.9) | 4 (15.4) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| Libga | 20 | 6 | Indoor | 2 (20) | 4 (20) | 0 | 0.2 | |
| 14 | Outdoor | 12 (60) | 2 (10) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| 14 | 6 | Indoor | 6 (42.9) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | ||
| 8 | Outdoor | 8 (57.1) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | |||
| 40 | 18 | Indoor | 14 (35) | 4 (10) | 0 | 0.4 | ||
| 22 | Outdoor | 16 (40) | 6 (15) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| Anyakpor | 44 | 32 | Indoor | 24 (54.5) | 8 (18.2) | 0 | 0.4 | |
| 12 | Outdoor | 12 (27.3) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | |||
| 4 | 0 | Indoor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| 4 | Outdoor | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | |||
| 4 | 2 | Indoor | 2 (50) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | ||
| 2 | Outdoor | 2 (50) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | |||
| Konongo | 72 | 60 | Indoor | 52 (72.2) | 8 (11.1) | 0 | 0.4 | |
| 12 | Outdoor | 10 (13.9) | 2 (2.8) | 0 | 0.4 | |||
| 42 | 34 | Indoor | 30 (71.4) | 4(9.5) | 0 | 0.4 | ||
| 8 | Outdoor | 6 (14.3) | 2 (4.8) | 0 | 0.4 |
For abbreviations, see Table 3
Blood meal origins of Anopheles mosquitoes collected indoors and outdoors at different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Site | Blood meal origins | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | Indoor | Outdoor | ||
| Kpalsogou | No. tested | 2 | 10 | 8 | 60 | 4 | 22 |
| Human | 2 (100) | 4 (40) | 26 (68.4) | 42 (70) | 2 (50) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Goat | 0 | 6 (60) | 10 (26.5) | 10 (16.7) | 2 (50) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Cow | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.3) | 4 (6.7) | 0 | 0 | |
| Dog | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (6.7) | 0 | 0 | |
| HBI | 100 | 40 | 68.4 | 70 | 50 | 54.5 | |
| BBI | 0 | 0 | 5.3 | 6.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pagaza | No. tested | 0 | 6 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| Human | 0 | 4 (66.7) | 8 (50) | 14 (77.8) | 2 (100) | 6 (75) | |
| Goat | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 8 (50) | 4 (22.2) | 0 | 2 (25) | |
| HBI | 0 | 66.7 | 50 | 77.8 | 100 | 75 | |
| BBI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Libga | No. tested | 6 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 16 |
| Human | 4 (66.7) | 8 (80) | 2 (100) | 8 (100) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (37.5) | |
| Goat | 2 (33.3) | 2 (20) | 0 | 0 | 8 (66.7) | 8 (50.0) | |
| Dog | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (12.5) | |
| HBI | 66.7 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 33.3 | 37.5 | |
| BBI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 00 | |
| Anyakpor | No. tested | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Human | 8 (66.7) | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Dog | 4 (33.3) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) | |||
| HBI | 66.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| BBI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Konongo | No. tested | 52 | 8 | 34 | 6 | ||
| Human | 48 (92.3) | 6 (75) | 30 (88.2) | 6 (100) | |||
| Goat | 4 (7.7) | 0 | 4 (11.8) | 0 | |||
| Pig | 0 | 2 (25) | 0 | 0 | |||
| Unidentified | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| HBI | 92.3 | 75 | 88.2 | 100 | |||
| BBI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
HBI Human blood index, BBI bovine blood index
Sporozoite infections detected in pooled Anopheles gambiae s.l. from different sites in three ecological zones of Ghana
| Location | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pools tested (no.) | Pf CSP +ve (no.) | Pools tested (no.) | Pf CSP +ve (no.) | Pools tested (no.) | Pf CSP +ve (no.) | ||
| Kpalsogou | Indoor | – | – | 4 | 2 (5%) | – | – |
| Outdoor | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| Pagaza | Indoor | – | – | – | – | 4 | 0 |
| Outdoor | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | – | – | |
| Libga | Indoor | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Outdoor | 12 | 0 | |||||
| Anyakpor | Indoor | 4 | 0 | – | – | ||
| Outdoor | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
| Konongo | Indoor | 8 | 2 (2.5%) | 2 | 0 | ||
| Outdoor | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
Pf CSP +ve Positive for Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein