Isaac A Hinne1, Simon K Attah1, Benedicta A Mensah2, Akua O Forson3, Yaw A Afrane4. 1. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute of Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. 3. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana. 4. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana. yaw_afrane@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the ecology of larval malaria and lymphatic filariasis mosquitoes in a changing environment is important in developing effective control tools or programmes. This study characterized the breeding habitats of Anopheles mosquitoes in rural communities in different ecological zones in Ghana during the dry and rainy seasons. METHODS: The spatio-temporal distribution, species composition, and abundance of larval Anopheles mosquitoes in breeding habitats were studied in five locations in three ecological zones of Ghana. These were Anyakpor (coastal savannah area), Duase (forest area), and Libga, Pagaza, and Kpalsogu (Sahel savannah area). Larvae were collected using standard dippers and were raised in the insectary for identification. RESULTS: Out of a total of 7984 mosquito larvae collected, 2152 (27.26%) were anophelines and were more abundant in the rainy season (70.82%) than in the dry season (29.18%). The anophelines comprised 2128 (98.88%) An. gambiae s.l., 16 (0.74%) An. rufipes, and 8 (0.37%) An. pharoensis. In the coastal savannah and forest zones, dug-out wells were the most productive habitat during the dry (1.59 larvae/dip and 1.47 larvae/dip) and rainy seasons (11.28 larvae/dip and 2.05 larvae/dip). Swamps and furrows were the most productive habitats in the Sahel savannah zone during the dry (0.25 larvae/dip) and rainy (2.14 larvae/dip) seasons, respectively. Anopheles coluzzii was the most abundant sibling species in all the ecological zones. Anopheles melas and An. arabiensis were encountered only in the coastal savannah and the Sahel savannah areas, respectively. Larval habitat types influenced the presence of larvae as well as larval density (p < 0.001). The land-use type affected the presence of Anopheles larvae (p = 0.001), while vegetation cover influenced larval density (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The most productive habitats were dug-out wells in the coastal savannah and forest zones, and furrows from irrigated canals in the Sahel savannah zone. Anopheles coluzzii was the predominant vector species in all the ecological zones. The abundance of Anopheles breeding habitats and larvae were influenced by anthropogenic activities. Encouraging people whose activities create the larval habitats to become involved in larval source management such as habitat manipulation to stop mosquito breeding will be important for malaria and lymphatic filariasis control.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the ecology of larval malaria and lymphatic filariasis mosquitoes in a changing environment is important in developing effective control tools or programmes. This study characterized the breeding habitats of Anopheles mosquitoes in rural communities in different ecological zones in Ghana during the dry and rainy seasons. METHODS: The spatio-temporal distribution, species composition, and abundance of larval Anopheles mosquitoes in breeding habitats were studied in five locations in three ecological zones of Ghana. These were Anyakpor (coastal savannah area), Duase (forest area), and Libga, Pagaza, and Kpalsogu (Sahel savannah area). Larvae were collected using standard dippers and were raised in the insectary for identification. RESULTS: Out of a total of 7984 mosquito larvae collected, 2152 (27.26%) were anophelines and were more abundant in the rainy season (70.82%) than in the dry season (29.18%). The anophelines comprised 2128 (98.88%) An. gambiae s.l., 16 (0.74%) An. rufipes, and 8 (0.37%) An. pharoensis. In the coastal savannah and forest zones, dug-out wells were the most productive habitat during the dry (1.59 larvae/dip and 1.47 larvae/dip) and rainy seasons (11.28 larvae/dip and 2.05 larvae/dip). Swamps and furrows were the most productive habitats in the Sahel savannah zone during the dry (0.25 larvae/dip) and rainy (2.14 larvae/dip) seasons, respectively. Anopheles coluzzii was the most abundant sibling species in all the ecological zones. Anopheles melas and An. arabiensis were encountered only in the coastal savannah and the Sahel savannah areas, respectively. Larval habitat types influenced the presence of larvae as well as larval density (p < 0.001). The land-use type affected the presence of Anopheles larvae (p = 0.001), while vegetation cover influenced larval density (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The most productive habitats were dug-out wells in the coastal savannah and forest zones, and furrows from irrigated canals in the Sahel savannah zone. Anopheles coluzzii was the predominant vector species in all the ecological zones. The abundance of Anopheles breeding habitats and larvae were influenced by anthropogenic activities. Encouraging people whose activities create the larval habitats to become involved in larval source management such as habitat manipulation to stop mosquito breeding will be important for malaria and lymphatic filariasis control.
Authors: Noboru Minakawa; Stephen Munga; Francis Atieli; Emmanuel Mushinzimana; Guofa Zhou; Andrew K Githeko; Guiyun Yan Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Samuel Dadzie; Daniel Boakye; Victor Asoala; Kwadwo Koram; Anthony Kiszewski; Maxwell Appawu Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: S Bhatt; D J Weiss; E Cameron; D Bisanzio; B Mappin; U Dalrymple; K Battle; C L Moyes; A Henry; P A Eckhoff; E A Wenger; O Briët; M A Penny; T A Smith; A Bennett; J Yukich; T P Eisele; J T Griffin; C A Fergus; M Lynch; F Lindgren; J M Cohen; C L J Murray; D L Smith; S I Hay; R E Cibulskis; P W Gething Journal: Nature Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sylvester Coleman; Samuel K Dadzie; Aklilu Seyoum; Yemane Yihdego; Peter Mumba; Dereje Dengela; Philip Ricks; Kristen George; Christen Fornadel; Daniel Szumlas; Paul Psychas; Jacob Williams; Maxwell A Appawu; Daniel A Boakye Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Lucy S Tusting; Julie Thwing; David Sinclair; Ulrike Fillinger; John Gimnig; Kimberly E Bonner; Christian Bottomley; Steven W Lindsay Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-08-29
Authors: Akua Obeng Forson; Isaac A Hinne; Shittu B Dhikrullahi; Isaac Kwame Sraku; Abdul Rahim Mohammed; Simon K Attah; Yaw Asare Afrane Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Denis Escobar; Osman Archaga; Allan Reyes; Adalid Palma; Ryan T Larson; Gissella M Vásquez; Gustavo Fontecha Journal: Insects Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Wilfred Ouma Otambo; Patrick O Onyango; Chloe Wang; Julius Olumeh; Benyl M Ondeto; Ming-Chieh Lee; Harrysone Atieli; Andrew K Githeko; James Kazura; Daibin Zhong; Guofa Zhou; John Githure; Collins Ouma; Guiyun Yan Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 4.047