Literature DB >> 35804120

Considerations for restorative dentistry secondary care referrals - part 1: defining strategic importance.

Don S Jayawardena1, Reem Ahmed2, Jacob Watts1, Joanne Cunliffe3, James Darcey3.   

Abstract

Strategic importance is an essential concept for dental service providers. It allows clinicians to differentiate treatment needs on both a patient level and a health care commissioning level, not simply based upon complexity alone. On a patient level, it influences both the clinician's and patient's decision as to whether a tooth/teeth should be restored, as well as determining the possible need for specialist input. On a commissioning level, it facilitates the prioritisation of limited resources.Strategic importance can be considered at a patient level, taking into factors such as age, tolerance to treatment and the patient's choice. It can also be considered at a mouth level, accounting for factors such as its impact on function and aesthetics function. All these factors together can influence the decision as to whether complex treatment is warranted on a given tooth, especially in a healthcare model where the allocation of limited resources is necessary.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35804120      PMCID: PMC9264738          DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4443-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   2.727


  16 in total

1.  Masticatory performance in older subjects with varying degrees of tooth loss.

Authors:  Kazunori Ikebe; Ken-ichi Matsuda; Ryosuke Kagawa; Kaori Enoki; Tadashi Okada; Minoru Yoshida; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Guide-Plane Retention in Designing Removable Partial Dentures.

Authors:  Matshediso Mothopi-Peri; C Peter Owen
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Shortened dental arches and oral function.

Authors:  A F Käyser
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 4.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Daniel Thoma; Ronald Jung; Marcel Zwahlen; Anja Zembic
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Urs Brägger; Niklaus P Lang; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  A study of 225 patients on bisphosphonates presenting to the bisphosphonate clinic at King's College Hospital.

Authors:  T Taylor; C Bryant; S Popat
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Effect of arch length on the functional well-being of dentate adults.

Authors:  J Montero; M Bravo; L A Hernández; A Dib
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw--2014 update.

Authors:  Salvatore L Ruggiero; Thomas B Dodson; John Fantasia; Reginald Goodday; Tara Aghaloo; Bhoomi Mehrotra; Felice O'Ryan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Restorative dentistry and oral rehabilitation: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

Authors:  C Butterworth; L McCaul; C Barclay
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.