Literature DB >> 35803733

Experiencing Surprise: The Temporal Dynamics of Its Impact on Memory.

Darya Frank1,2, Alex Kafkas3, Daniela Montaldi3.   

Abstract

To efficiently process information, the brain shifts between encoding and retrieval states, prioritizing bottom-up or top-down processing accordingly. Expectation violation before or during learning has been shown to trigger an adaptive encoding mechanism, resulting in better memory for unexpected events. Using fMRI, we explored (1) whether this encoding mechanism is also triggered during retrieval, and if so, (2) what the temporal dynamics of its mnemonic consequences are. Male and female participants studied object images, then, with new objects, they learned a contingency between a cue and a semantic category. Rule-abiding (expected) and violating (unexpected) targets and similar foils were used at test. We found interactions between previous and current similar events' expectation, such that when an expected event followed a similar but unexpected event, its performance was boosted, underpinned by activation in the hippocampus, midbrain, and occipital cortex. In contrast, a sequence of two unexpected similar events also triggered occipital engagement; however, this did not enhance memory performance. Taken together, our findings suggest that when the goal is to retrieve, encountering surprising events engages an encoding mechanism, supported by bottom-up processing, that may enhance memory for future related events.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Optimizing the balance between new learning and the retrieval of existing knowledge is an ongoing process, at the core of human cognition. Previous research into memory encoding suggests experiencing surprise leads to the prioritization of the learning of new memories, forming an adaptive encoding mechanism. We examined whether this mechanism is also engaged when the current goal is to retrieve information. Our results demonstrate that an expectation-driven shift toward an encoding state, supported by enhanced perceptual processing, is beneficial for the correct identification of subsequent expected similar events. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the temporal dynamics of the adaptive encoding of information into memory.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectation violation; hippocampus; memory states; surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35803733      PMCID: PMC9398538          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  35 in total

Review 1.  Theta oscillations in the hippocampus.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Neural correlates of exemplar novelty processing under different spatial attention conditions.

Authors:  Christian Michael Stoppel; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Hendrik Strumpf; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens Max Hopf; Emrah Düzel; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error.

Authors:  Ghootae Kim; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hippocampal Mismatch Signals Are Modulated by the Strength of Neural Predictions and Their Similarity to Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Hongmi Lee; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dopamine-dependent facilitation of LTP induction in hippocampal CA1 by exposure to spatial novelty.

Authors:  Shaomin Li; William K Cullen; Roger Anwyl; Michael J Rowan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Integrating memories in the human brain: hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events.

Authors:  Daphna Shohamy; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Memory's penumbra: episodic memory decisions induce lingering mnemonic biases.

Authors:  Katherine Duncan; Arhanti Sadanand; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  How do memory systems detect and respond to novelty?

Authors:  Alex Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Learning and attention increase visual response selectivity through distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Jasper Poort; Katharina A Wilmes; Antonin Blot; Angus Chadwick; Maneesh Sahani; Claudia Clopath; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Sonja B Hofer; Adil G Khan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Mnemonic prediction errors bias hippocampal states.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Katherine Duncan; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.