Literature DB >> 3580223

Ten year clinical evaluation of Starr-Edwards 2400 and 1260 aortic valve prostheses.

D Hackett, I Fessatidis, R Sapsford, C Oakley.   

Abstract

The long term performance characteristics of the 2400 and 1260 series of Starr-Edwards aortic prostheses were investigated by a follow up study of clinical outcome of 327 patients discharged from hospital with isolated aortic valve replacement. Follow up lasted for up to 10 years and was based on 1616 patient-years. The 2400 series cloth covered tracked valve was implanted in 182 patients from 1974 to 1980 and the 1260 series bare strut silastic ball valve was inserted in 145 patients from 1979 to 1983. Total 10 year mortality and valve related morbidity were low and no cases of mechanical valve failure were recorded. There were no significant actuarial differences in mortality or valve related morbidity between the 2400 and 1260 valves. Starr-Edwards models 2400 and 1260 aortic valve prostheses showed excellent durability without any mechanical failures over a 10 year period. The long term outcome of isolated aortic valve replacement with these models is associated with a low frequency of valve related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3580223      PMCID: PMC1277175          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.57.4.356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  18 in total

1.  A GENERALIZED WILCOXON TEST FOR COMPARING ARBITRARILY SINGLY-CENSORED SAMPLES.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  W A Baumgartner; D C Miller; B A Reitz; P E Oyer; S W Jamieson; E B Stinson; N E Shumway
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  The Starr-Edwards valve.

Authors:  A Starr
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparison of bioprosthetic and mechanical valve replacement for active endocarditis.

Authors:  M S Sweeney; G J Reul; D A Cooley; D A Ott; J M Duncan; O H Frazier; J J Livesay
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  T S Ivert; W E Dismukes; C G Cobbs; E H Blackstone; J W Kirklin; L A Bergdahl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Aortic valve replacement with Starr-Edwards valves over 14 years.

Authors:  W H Wain; P J Drury; D N Ross
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Thrombosis of mechanical cardiac valves: a qualitative comparison of the silastic ball valve and the tilting disc valve.

Authors:  M T Metzdorff; G L Grunkemeier; C W Pinson; A Starr
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Year of operation as a risk factor in the late results of valve replacement.

Authors:  Q Macmanus; G L Grunkemeier; L E Lambert; J F Teply; B J Harlan; A Starr
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years.

Authors:  D C Miller; P E Oyer; R S Mitchell; E B Stinson; S W Jamieson; J C Baldwin; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards and Hancock prostheses: comparative analysis of late morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  P E Oyer; E B Stinson; R B Griepp; N E Shumway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Twenty-two-year experience with aortic valve replacement. Starr-Edwards ball valves versus disc valves.

Authors:  H K Pilegaard; O Lund; T T Nielsen; K Magnussen; M A Knudsen; O K Albrechtsen
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.