Ian Schmid1, Elizabeth A Stuart1,2,3, Alexander D McCourt2, Kayla N Tormohlen2, Elizabeth M Stone2, Corey S Davis4, Mark C Bicket5,6, Emma E McGinty1,2. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 4. Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 6. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on opioid prescribing after surgery. DATA SOURCES: OptumLabs Data Warehouse administrative claims data covering all 50 states from July 2012 through June 2019. STUDY DESIGN: We included individuals from 20 states that had implemented prescribing cap laws without exemptions for postsurgical pain by June 2019 and individuals from 16 control states plus the District of Columbia. We used a difference-in-differences approach accounting for differential timing in law implementation across states to estimate the effects of state prescribing cap laws on postsurgical prescribing of opioids. Outcome measures included filling an opioid prescription within 30 days after surgery; filling opioid prescriptions of specific doses or durations; and the number, days' supply, daily dose, and pill quantity of opioid prescriptions. To assess the validity of the parallel counterfactual trends assumption, we examined differences in outcome trends between law-implementing and control states in the years preceding law implementation using an equivalence testing framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We included the first surgery in the study period for opioid-naïve individuals undergoing one of eight common surgical procedures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: State prescribing cap laws were associated with 0.109 lower days' supply of postsurgical opioids on the log scale (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -0.139, -0.080) but were not associated with the number (Average treatment effect on the treated [ATT]: -0.011; 95% CI: -0.043, 0.021) or daily dose of postsurgical opioid prescriptions (ATT: -0.013; 95% CI: -0.030, 0.005). The negative association observed between prescribing cap laws and the probability of filling a postsurgical opioid prescription (ATT: -0.041; 95% CI: -0.054, -0.028) was likely spurious, given differences between law-implementing and control states in the pre-law period. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing cap laws appear to have minimal effects on postsurgical opioid prescribing.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on opioid prescribing after surgery. DATA SOURCES: OptumLabs Data Warehouse administrative claims data covering all 50 states from July 2012 through June 2019. STUDY DESIGN: We included individuals from 20 states that had implemented prescribing cap laws without exemptions for postsurgical pain by June 2019 and individuals from 16 control states plus the District of Columbia. We used a difference-in-differences approach accounting for differential timing in law implementation across states to estimate the effects of state prescribing cap laws on postsurgical prescribing of opioids. Outcome measures included filling an opioid prescription within 30 days after surgery; filling opioid prescriptions of specific doses or durations; and the number, days' supply, daily dose, and pill quantity of opioid prescriptions. To assess the validity of the parallel counterfactual trends assumption, we examined differences in outcome trends between law-implementing and control states in the years preceding law implementation using an equivalence testing framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We included the first surgery in the study period for opioid-naïve individuals undergoing one of eight common surgical procedures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: State prescribing cap laws were associated with 0.109 lower days' supply of postsurgical opioids on the log scale (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -0.139, -0.080) but were not associated with the number (Average treatment effect on the treated [ATT]: -0.011; 95% CI: -0.043, 0.021) or daily dose of postsurgical opioid prescriptions (ATT: -0.013; 95% CI: -0.030, 0.005). The negative association observed between prescribing cap laws and the probability of filling a postsurgical opioid prescription (ATT: -0.041; 95% CI: -0.054, -0.028) was likely spurious, given differences between law-implementing and control states in the pre-law period. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing cap laws appear to have minimal effects on postsurgical opioid prescribing.
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Jenna Goesling; Stephanie Moser; Paul Lin; Michael J Englesbe; Amy S B Bohnert; Sachin Kheterpal; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Christopher M McDowell; Alexandria K Bradian; Quincy T Cheesman; Sundeep S Saini; Kristen J Nicholson; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; Luke S Austin Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Daniel B C Reid; Kalpit N Shah; Benjamin H Shapiro; Jack H Ruddell; Edward Akelman; Alan H Daniels Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Ian Schmid; Elizabeth A Stuart; Alexander D McCourt; Kayla N Tormohlen; Elizabeth M Stone; Corey S Davis; Mark C Bicket; Emma E McGinty Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Brice A Kessler; Brainard Burrus; Greeshma Somashekar; Samuel P Wurzelmann; Deb Bhowmick Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Rebecca E Scully; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Wei Jiang; Stuart Lipsitz; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Peter A Learn; Tracey Koehlmoos; Adil H Haider; Louis L Nguyen Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Gery P Guy; Kun Zhang; Michele K Bohm; Jan Losby; Brian Lewis; Randall Young; Louise B Murphy; Deborah Dowell Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Lyna Z Schieber; Gery P Guy; Puja Seth; Randall Young; Christine L Mattson; Christina A Mikosz; Richard A Schieber Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Ivelisse L Valdes; Marie-Christin Possinger; Juan M Hincapie-Castillo; Amie J Goodin; Marvin A Dewar; Jill M Sumfest; Scott M Vouri Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Ian Schmid; Elizabeth A Stuart; Alexander D McCourt; Kayla N Tormohlen; Elizabeth M Stone; Corey S Davis; Mark C Bicket; Emma E McGinty Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 3.734