| Literature DB >> 35800661 |
Karim El-Kersh1, C Danielle Hopkins2, Xiaoyong Wu3, Shesh N Rai3,4, Lu Cai5,6,7, Jiapeng Huang2,6,7,8,9.
Abstract
It is unknown if environmental antimony exposure influences pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and right ventricular function. We performed a pilot study to evaluate antimony levels in 20 PAH patients and 10 controls. Also, we explored the correlation of antimony level with PAH prognostic hemodynamic markers. Antimony blood and plasma levels were significantly higher in PAH patients when compared to controls [blood: PAH mean ± SD (95%CI) 1.3 ± 0.6 (1.0-1.5) ng/ml vs. control mean ± SD (95%) 0.7 ± 0.5 (0.4-1.0) ng/ml, p = 0.017] [plasma: PH mean ± SD (95%CI) 2.6 ± 1 (2.2-3.1) ng/ml vs. control mean ± SD (95%CI) 1.5 ± 0.8 (1.0-2.0) ng/ml, p = 0.004]. Also, antimony blood and plasma levels were significantly higher in idiopathic-PAH patients and non-idiopathic PAH when compared to controls. There was a trend for higher blood and plasma antimony levels in idiopathic PAH [blood1.6 ± 0.6 (1.1-2.1) ng/ml and plasma 3.1 ± 1.2 (2.2-4.1) ng/ml] when compared to non-idiopathic PAH [blood 1.1 ± 0.6(0.8-1.4) ng/ml and plasma 2.5 ± 0.9(2-2.9) ng/ml], but it did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant correlation between plasma antimony level and all the prognostic hemodynamic parameters of PAH including mRAP (r = 0.47, p = 0.036), CO (r = -0.50, p = 0.026), CI (r = -0.54, p = 0.014), PVR (r = 0.52, p = 0.019), and SvO2 (r = -0.54, p = 0.016).Entities:
Keywords: Antimony; Metal toxicity; Non-essential metals; PAH; RV dysfunction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800661 PMCID: PMC9254336 DOI: 10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Toxicol ISSN: 2666-027X
Comparing antimony levels in PAH patients vs. controls (n = 30).
| Mean (95%CI) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 1.3 (1.0–1.5) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.5 | 0.6 | |
| Mean (95%CI) | 1.5 (1.0–2.0) | 2.6 (2.2–3.1) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.8 | 1.0 | |
| Mean (95%CI) | *0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.1 (-0.1–0.3) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0 | 0.5 |
*Urine samples were available in 9 controls.
Comparing antimony levels in idiopathic and non-idiopathic PAH patients vs. controls (n = 30).
| Mean (95%CI) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 1.6 (1.1–2.1) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
| Mean (95%CI) | 1.5 (1.0–2.0) | 3.1 (2.2–4.1) | 2.5 (2.0–2.9) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | |
| Mean (95%CI) | *0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0.2 (0.0–0.5) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
*Urine samples were available in 9 controls.
Comparing antimony levels in idiopathic PAH and non-idiopathic PAH groups (n = 20).
| Mean (95%CI) | 1.6 (1.1–2.1) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | |
| Standard Deviation | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
| Mean (95%CI) | 3.1 (2.2–4.1) | 2.5 (2.0–2.9) | |
| Standard Deviation | 1.2 | 0.9 |
Fig. 1Scatter plots of plasma antimony (Sb) and mRAP (A), PVR (B), CI (C), and SvO2% (D). *Svo2% was missing in one patient.