Raymond L Benza1, Mardi Gomberg-Maitland2, C Greg Elliott3, Harrison W Farber4, Aimee J Foreman5, Adaani E Frost6, Michael D McGoon7, David J Pasta5, Mona Selej8, Charles D Burger9, Robert P Frantz7. 1. Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: Raymond.Benza@ahn.org. 2. George Washington University, Washington, DC. 3. Intermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 4. Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. 5. ICON Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA. 6. Houston Methodist Hospital Lung Center, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX. 7. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 8. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US Inc., South San Francisco, CA. 9. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies. METHODS: A subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk. RESULTS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies. METHODS: A subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk. RESULTS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk. CONCLUSIONS: REVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Ghaleb Khirfan; Mostafa K Ahmed; Saja Almaaitah; Alla Almoushref; Gamal M Agmy; Raed A Dweik; Adriano R Tonelli Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Catherine E Simpson; Rachel L Damico; Paul M Hassoun; Lisa J Martin; Jun Yang; Melanie K Nies; R Dhananjay Vaidya; Stephanie Brandal; Michael W Pauciulo; Eric D Austin; D Dunbar Ivy; William C Nichols; Allen D Everett Journal: Chest Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Manreet K Kanwar; Mardi Gomberg-Maitland; Marius Hoeper; Christine Pausch; David Pittrow; Geoff Strange; James J Anderson; Carol Zhao; Jacqueline V Scott; Marek J Druzdzel; Jidapa Kraisangka; Lisa Lohmueller; James Antaki; Raymond L Benza Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Vivek Nagaraja; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Daniel E Furst; Masataka Kuwana; Yannick Allanore; Christopher P Denton; Ganesh Raghu; Vallerie Mclaughlin; Panduranga S Rao; James R Seibold; John D Pauling; Michael L Whitfield; Dinesh Khanna Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Elena A Goncharova; Stephen Y Chan; Corey E Ventetuolo; Norbert Weissmann; Ralph T Schermuly; Christopher J Mullin; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason H Karnes; Howard W Wiener; Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An; Balaji Natarajan; Andrew J Sweatt; Abhishek Chaturvedi; Amit Arora; Ken Batai; Vineet Nair; Heidi E Steiner; Jason B Giles; Jeffrey Yu; Maryam Hosseini; Michael W Pauciulo; Katie A Lutz; Anna W Coleman; Jeremy Feldman; Rebecca Vanderpool; Haiyang Tang; Joe G N Garcia; Jason X-J Yuan; Rick Kittles; Vinicio de Jesus Perez; Roham T Zamanian; Franz Rischard; Hemant K Tiwari; William C Nichols; Raymond L Benza; Ankit A Desai Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Aparna Balasubramanian; Todd M Kolb; Rachel L Damico; Paul M Hassoun; Meredith C McCormack; Stephen C Mathai Journal: Chest Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: James C Coons; Kristen Pogue; Andrew R Kolodziej; Glenn A Hirsch; Marjorie Patricia George Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 2.931