| Literature DB >> 35799223 |
Yang Li1,2, Chao Feng Yang1, Jun Peng2, Bing Li1, Chuan Zhang1, Jin Hong Yu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) for small (≤ 20 mm) ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions has not been reported in detail.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Diagnostic accuracy; Ground-glass opacity; Interventional radiology; Lung
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799223 PMCID: PMC9264544 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02058-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.320
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study group
Fig. 2CT-guided core biopsy in 47-year-old man with pure ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesion in left upper lobe. A. CT scan shows 10-mm pure GGO lesion in left upper lobe. B. CT scan obtained during biopsy shows needle targeting GGO lesion. C. Histologic diagnosis of biopsy was adenocarcinoma. (H and E, × 200)
Histologic results for 112 malignant lung lesions and 44 benign lung lesions with final diagnostic
| Diagnosis | Number of cases |
|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma | 105 |
| Bronchioalveolar carcinoma | 7 |
| Non-specific inflammation | 24 |
| Interstitial fibrosis | 11 |
| Organizing pneumonia | 7 |
| Tuberculosis | 2 |
| Total | 156 |
Final diagnoses
| CNB histologic results | Final diagnosis | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant | Benign | ||
| Malignant | 97 | 0 | 97 |
| Benign | 15 | 44 | 59 |
| Total | 112 | 44 | 156 |
Diagnostic accuracy in relation to various factors
| Variable | No. of diagnostic cases | Total No. of cases | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.652 | |||
| < 50 | 65 | 71 | 91.5 | |
| ≥ 50 | 76 | 85 | 89.4 | |
| Sex | 0.215 | |||
| Male | 61 | 65 | 93.8 | |
| Female | 80 | 91 | 87.9 | |
| Emphysema on CT | 0.972 | |||
| None | 101 | 112 | 90.2 | |
| Mild | 19 | 21 | 90.5 | |
| Moderate | 14 | 15 | 93.3 | |
| Prominent | 7 | 8 | 87.5 | |
| Lesion size (mm) | < 0.001 | |||
| ≤ 10 | 29 | 40 | 72.5 | |
| 11–20 | 112 | 116 | 96.6 | |
| GGO component | < 0.001 | |||
| > 90% | 35 | 47 | 74.5 | |
| 50–90% | 106 | 109 | 97.2 | |
| Lesion depth (mm) | ||||
| 0 | 35 | 38 | 92.1 | 0.891 |
| 1–20 | 48 | 53 | 90.6 | |
| > 20 | 58 | 65 | 89.2 | |
| Lesion location | 0.331 | |||
| Upper and middle lobes | 93 | 101 | 92.1 | |
| Lower lobe | 48 | 55 | 87.3 | |
| Specimen size (mm) | 0.491 | |||
| < 15 | 81 | 91 | 89.0 | |
| ≥ 15 mm | 60 | 65 | 92.3 | |
| Individual radiologist | 0.788 | |||
| A | 39 | 42 | 92.9 | |
| B | 55 | 61 | 90.2 | |
| C | 47 | 53 | 88.7 | |
The diagnostic accuracy based on lesion size and GGO component
| Variable | Diagnostic accuracy* | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| > 90% GGO component (n = 47) | 50–90% GGO component (n = 109) | ||
| Lesion size (mm) | |||
| ≤ 10 (n = 40) | 12/21 (57.1%) | 17/19 (89.5%) | 0.022 |
| 11–20 (n = 116) | 23/26 (88.5%) | 89/90 (98.9%) | 0.035 |
| | 0.014 | 0.078 | |
*Data are numbers of patients, with percentages in parentheses
Diagnostic accuracy to various related factors evaluated by multiple logistic regression
| Variable | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion size (mm) | ||||
| ≤ 10 | 72.5 (29/40) | Reference | 1.0 | |
| 11–20 | 96.6 (112/116) | 0.022 | 4.8 | 1.3–18.5 |
| GGO component | ||||
| > 90% | 74.5%(35/47) | Reference | 1.0 | |
| 50–90% | 97.2%(106/109) | 0.015 | 6.0 | 1.4–25.7 |