Tiago Kojun Tibana1, Leonardo Verza2, Bernardo Caetano da Silva Rodrigues3, Lucas Moretti Monsignore4, Daniel Giansante Abud4, Thiago Franchi Nunes1. 1. Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 2. Department of Imaging, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Federal Ipanema (HFI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 4. Division de of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
The image-guided gastrostomy techniques, as transoral and transabdominal, can be performed when there is a failure of the endoscopic procedure or in some specific clinical scenarios. This pictorial essay intends to show the percutaneous gastrostomy techniques, indications, technical approaches, post-procedure care, and complications.
The image-guided gastrostomy techniques, as transoral and transabdominal, can be performed when there is a failure of the endoscopic procedure or in some specific clinical scenarios. This pictorial essay intends to show the percutaneous gastrostomy techniques, indications, technical approaches, post-procedure care, and complications.
Gastrostomy has been performed since the 19th century. However, when it is performed
by open surgery, it requires general anesthesia, which is associated with high
morbidity and mortality. Therefore, open gastrostomy has been replaced by
percutaneous methods. In 1980, Gauderer et al.( described the first successful
percutaneous gastrostomy, which was achieved with the aid of endoscopy. A year
later, Preshaw(
described the first successful percutaneous gastrostomy using fluoroscopic guidance,
which has become established as a safe, effective technique for enteral nutrition or
gastric decompression.Image-guided gastrostomy, whether transoral( or transabdominal(, can be performed when the endoscopic
technique fails or in clinical settings where endoscopy cannot be performed,
including rigid stenosis of the upper gastrointestinal tract, hernia of large
hiatus, or significant obesity(.
Consistently high (95-100%) success rates have been reported for transabdominal
gastrostomy(. In a meta-analysis, Wollman et al.( found that the success
rate for transoral gastrostomy is 99.2%, compared with 95.7% for the transabdominal
endoscopic technique.The main disadvantage of an exclusively percutaneous method is the smaller-diameter
tubes that are typically used, which are more prone to occlusion. In addition,
fluoroscopic guidance may be required when those tubes have to be
replaced(.Since the introduction of percutaneous gastrostomy in 1980, various procedures have
been developed. The techniques and the equipment used in percutaneous insertion were
improved and are now considered to represent one of the best options for
gastrostomy(.
INDICATIONS
To be considered candidates for gastrostomy, patients should be at high risk for
malnutrition and not likely to recover their ability to eat in the short term or
should require long-term gastric decompression. Indications include the
following(: neurogenic dysphagia with high risk of aspiration; a
history of stroke, cognitive impairment, or reduced level of consciousness;
degenerative syndromes; head and neck cancer; a history of oral or throat surgery;
syndromes that progress to malabsorption; Crohn’s disease; the need for nutritional
supplementation; systemic sclerosis; radiation enteritis; severe burns; and profound
depression.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The relative contraindications to gastrostomy include ascites, partial gastrectomy,
large hiatal hernia, gastric volvulus, esophagectomy with gastric traction, colonic
interposition, diaphragmatic denervation with upward displacement of the stomach,
prolonged use of steroids, and immunosuppression. The main absolute
contraindications are uncorrectable coagulopathies, active peritonitis, mesenteric
ischemia, obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract (unless the indication is
decompression), and portal hypertension with gastric varices, which can bleed
profusely(.
INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Retrograde transabdominal gastrostomy
A specific kit is typically used for transabdominal gastrostomy(, as depicted in Figure 1. After insufflation of the stomach
with air or oxygen via a nasogastric tube, anteroposterior and lateral X-ray
views of the stomach are obtained in order to confirm interposition of the
transverse colon. A needle is introduced through the anterior abdominal wall
into the stomach and contrast is injected to confirm opacification of the
gastric lumen. Two or more gastropexy T-fasteners are advanced and implanted
into the gastric body under guidance by fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT),
to secure the anterior wall of the stomach to the abdominal wall, and the
puncture is then performed between the fasteners. The transabdominal path is
serially dilated guided by a 0.035-in. guidewire (Amplatz; Cook Medical,
Bloomington, IN, USA), and a 20F detachable sheath is advanced into the gastric
lumen. The balloon gastrostomy tube is then advanced over the guidewire,
inflated with a small volume of diluted contrast solution, retracted into the
anterior gastric wall, and secured in place by an retention disc advanced to the
overlying skin. The correct positioning is confirmed by opacification of gastric
lumen after contrast injection (Figures 2
and 3).
Figure 1
In A, a kit used for transabdominal insertion with fasteners
(arrows). In B, schematic demonstrating the puncture (arrow) between
the fasteners.
Figure 2
CT-guided retrograde gastrostomy. In A, gastropexy. In B, puncture
between the fasteners (arrows). In C, final appearance with an
inflated cuff (arrows) inside the stomach.
Figure 3
Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde gastrostomy. In A, gastropexy (arrows).
In B, puncture between the fasteners. In C, guidewire inside the
stomach. In D, final appearance with the tube in place (arrows).
In A, a kit used for transabdominal insertion with fasteners
(arrows). In B, schematic demonstrating the puncture (arrow) between
the fasteners.CT-guided retrograde gastrostomy. In A, gastropexy. In B, puncture
between the fasteners (arrows). In C, final appearance with an
inflated cuff (arrows) inside the stomach.Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde gastrostomy. In A, gastropexy (arrows).
In B, puncture between the fasteners. In C, guidewire inside the
stomach. In D, final appearance with the tube in place (arrows).In the CT-guided technique, the gastric antrum can be insufflated with a gastric
tube or by direct puncture of the empty stomach with a Chiba 21G needle and
subsequent distention with room air. Two or three fasteners are inserted to fix
the gastric body to the abdominal wall. A needle from the guidewire kit is
inserted between the fasteners, and sequential detachable dilators are inserted
through the needle track. The balloon gastrostomy tube is then advanced over the
guidewire. The retention balloon is inflated, and the tube is partially
retracted for adequate fixation to the anterior gastric wall. All steps of the
procedure and the final position of the probe are confirmed by
CT(,
as illustrated in Figure 2. In brief, the
steps are as follows: guided puncture; insertion of fasteners; puncture between
fasteners; dilation of the path along the guidewire; detachable sheath
insertion; passage of the tube over the guidewire; and balloon inflation.
Antegrade transoral techniques
In one antegrade transoral gastrostomy technique, the tube is placed by an
antegrade approach using an percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
system(, as depicted in Figure
4. The stomach is insufflated with air or oxygen via a nasogastric
tube. Anteroposterior and lateral X-rays are then obtained, after which the
puncture is performed with a 21G or 19G needle through the anterior abdominal
wall to the stomach between the body and the antrum. In another technique,
saline solution is infused through a nasogastric tube and ultrasound-guided
puncture is performed (Figure 5).
Figure 4
In A, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy system used in
fastener-free antegrade techniques with a mushroom-tipped tube
(arrow). In B, position of the sheath (arrow) within the
stomach.
Figure 5
Gastric distention with saline solution (arrows in A) and
ultrasound-guided puncture (arrows in B).
In A, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy system used in
fastener-free antegrade techniques with a mushroom-tipped tube
(arrow). In B, position of the sheath (arrow) within the
stomach.Gastric distention with saline solution (arrows in A) and
ultrasound-guided puncture (arrows in B).In the first technique, the needle is replaced with a guidewire and a 6F angled
diagnostic catheter. A 0.035-in. hydrophilic guidewire is inserted into the
catheter, is routed into the esophagus, and finally emerges from the mouth
(Figure 6). A double guidewire is
passed through the catheter and fixed by the tie onto the tube with a “mushroom”
tip. The gastrostomy tube is then inserted into the mouth, through the
esophagus, and finally into the stomach so that the retention “mushroom” is
securely positioned against the anterior wall of the stomach. In brief, the
steps are as follows: guided puncture; replacement of the needle with a
diagnostic catheter and hydrophilic guidewire; passage of the guidewire and
catheter through the esophagus to the mouth; replacement of the hydrophilic
guidewire with the double guidewire; fixation of the double guidewire in the
mushroom-retained tube; and insertion/placement of the tube into the stomach via
the mouth and esophagus.
Figure 6
Fluoroscopy-guided antegrade gastrostomy. In A, contrast infusion
through the nasogastric tube (arrows) and stomach insufflation
(arrowheads). In B, guidewire (arrows) and catheter (arrowhead)
along the path from the stomach to the esophagus and to the mouth.
In C, gastrostomy tube being positioned (arrows). In D, final
positioning of the gastrostomy tube (arrows).
Fluoroscopy-guided antegrade gastrostomy. In A, contrast infusion
through the nasogastric tube (arrows) and stomach insufflation
(arrowheads). In B, guidewire (arrows) and catheter (arrowhead)
along the path from the stomach to the esophagus and to the mouth.
In C, gastrostomy tube being positioned (arrows). In D, final
positioning of the gastrostomy tube (arrows).In the second technique (Figure 7), the
needle is replaced with a 6F angiographic introducer. A 0.035-in hydrophilic
guidewire and diagnostic catheter are then introduced into the stomach. The
hydrophilic guidewire and catheter are then captured from within the stomach, by
a snare inside a 7F or 8F sheath, and pulled up to the mouth. The hydrophilic
guidewire is replaced with a double guidewire, which is then fixed by the tie
onto a tube with a mushroom tip. The gastrostomy tube is then inserted into the
mouth, through the esophagus, and finally into the stomach. The correct
positioning of the tube is confirmed by opacification of gastric lumen after
contrast injection. In brief, the steps are as follows: guided puncture;
replacement of the needle with an angiographic introducer; passage of a
diagnostic catheter and hydrophilic guidewire into the stomach; passage of the
sheath through the mouth to the stomach; passing snare inside the sheath;
capture of the hydrophilic guidewire and catheter through the snare, which are
then pulled to the mouth; fixation of the double guidewire in the
mushroom-retained tube; and insertion/placement of the tube into the stomach via
the mouth and esophagus.
Figure 7
Fluoroscopy-guided antegrade gastrostomy. In A, capture of the
hydrophilic guidewire by the snare. In B and C, the final
appearance, with contrast injection through the tube (arrows).
Fluoroscopy-guided antegrade gastrostomy. In A, capture of the
hydrophilic guidewire by the snare. In B and C, the final
appearance, with contrast injection through the tube (arrows).
MEDICATIONS AND PERIPROCEDURAL CARE
For patients undergoing gastrostomy, anesthesia is required, usually involving
conscious sedation and local nerve blocks. It is crucial to have a multidisciplinary
team for intravenous drug administration and patient monitoring. Midazolam and
fentanyl are usually sufficient, although should be monitored continuously during
the procedure. Intraluminal distention is fundamental and essential for the success
of the procedure. Antispasmodics such as hyoscine butylbromide are useful,
particularly in cases in which it is difficult to maintain gastric distention.
POSTPROCEDURAL PROTOCOLS
Postprocedural imaging is rarely necessary. However, if there is any question about
the intragastric placement, unenhanced CT can be performed for clarification. Chest
X-rays are of no value to exclude perforation, because pneumoperitoneum is a natural
consequence of puncture of a distended stomach and free subdiaphragmatic air should
not be considered a reliable sign of intestinal perforation. There is no consensus
on when feeding can be started after tube insertion. Most centers apply a 4-6 hour
fasting period before testing the tube by injecting water. Prior to receiving
enteral nutrition, the patient should be evaluated by a trained member of the
nutritional support team to decide whether the tube can be used.
COMPLICATIONS
Major complications of gastrostomy include hemorrhage, peritonitis, colon
perforation, and severe skin infection, although the incidence rates of such
complications are low (< 2.0%). Minor complications are more common and include
peristomal infection, leaks, tube occlusion, and tube displacement, with incidence
rates ranging from 1.3% to 45%(.
CONCLUSION
Percutaneous gastrostomy is a safe, effective procedure, with good success rates and
low complication rates, being feasible when conventional techniques cannot be
performed. The main limitation of percutaneous gastrostomy is the smaller tube size,
which can lead to a higher obstruction rate(.
Authors: Maxim Itkin; Mark H DeLegge; John C Fang; Stephen A McClave; Sanjoy Kundu; Bertrand Janne d'Othee; Gloria M Martinez-Salazar; David Sacks; Timothy L Swan; Richard B Towbin; T Gregory Walker; Joan C Wojak; Darryl A Zuckerman; John F Cardella Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: T de Baere; R Chapot; V Kuoch; P Chevallier; J P Delille; C Domenge; G Schwaab; A Roche Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John S Leeds; Mark E McAlindon; Julia Grant; Helen E Robson; Fred K T Lee; David S Sanders Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Amir A Rahnemaiazar; Rozhin Naghshizadian; Amparo Kurtz; Daniel T Farkas Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Chiang Jeng Tyng; Erich Frank Vater Santos; Luiz Felipe Alves Guerra; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Barbosa; Rubens Chojniak Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2017 Mar-Apr