Literature DB >> 7480742

Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature.

B Wollman1, H B D'Agostino, J R Walus-Wigle, D W Easter, A Beale.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiologic, percutaneous endoscopic (PEG), and surgical gastrostomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This project involved 5,752 patients (837 patients underwent radiologic gastrotomy; 4,194, PEG; and 721, surgical gastrostomy). Seventy-two (47 male, 25 female; age range, 12-94 years) underwent gastrostomy within 1 year in this series (radiologic gastrostomy, n = 33; PEG, n = 35; surgical gastrostomy, n = 4). A meta-analysis of 5,680 additional cases from literature published from 1980 to the present was also performed.
RESULTS: Rates of successful tube placement were higher for radiologic gastrostomy than for PEG in our series and in the meta-analysis (99.2% vs 95.7%, P < .001). Major complications occurred less frequently after radiologic gastrostomy in our series and in the meta-analysis (5.9% vs 9.4% for PEG and 19.9% for surgery, P < .001). Thirty-day procedure-related mortality rates were highest for surgery (2.5% vs 0.3% for radiologic gastrostomy and 0.53% for PEG, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Radiologic gastrostomy is associated with a higher success rate than is PEG and less morbidity than either PEG or surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7480742     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  72 in total

Review 1.  The role of the interventional radiologist in enteral alimentation.

Authors:  M F Given; S M Lyon; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients.

Authors:  M Stroud; H Duncan; J Nightingale
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Yongfan Zhao; Tianpeng Xie; Yang Hu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Obstruction of the bypassed stomach treated with percutaneous drainage: an alternative treatment for selected cases.

Authors:  E M López-Tomassetti Fernández; I Arteaga González; H Diaz-Luis; A Carrillo Pallares
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines in modern interventional radiology practice.

Authors:  Eunice Moon; Matthew D B S Tam; Raghid N Kikano; Karunakaravel Karuppasamy
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Percutaneous feeding tubes.

Authors:  Amanda J Stiglick; Mark O Baerlocher; Murray Asch; Andrew Myers; C S Ho
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Enterostomy tube feeding: The ins and outs.

Authors:  Jeremy N Friedman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Bleeding risk with clopidogrel and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Umair Sohail; Chela Harleen; Amin O Mahdi; Murtaza Arif; Douglas L Nguyen; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.