Literature DB >> 35795407

The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.

Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari1.   

Abstract

Likened to the economic calamity of World War Two, the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked fears of a deep economic crisis, killed more than six million people worldwide and had a ripple effect on all aspects of life. MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) methods have become increasingly popular in modeling COVID-19 problems owing to the multi-dimensionality of this crisis and the complexity of health and socio-economic systems. This paper is aimed to review 72 papers published in 37 leading peer-reviewed journals indexed in Web of Science that used MCDM methods in different areas of COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, data retrieval follows the PRISMA protocol for systematic literature reviews. 35 countries have contributed to this multidisciplinary research and India is identified as the leading country in this field followed by Turkey and China. Also 36 articles, namely 50% of papers are presented in the form of international cooperation. "Applied Soft Computing" is the journal with the highest number of articles whereas "Journal of infection and public health" and "Operations Management Research" are ranked in the second place. The results indicate that AHP (including fuzzy AHP) is the most popular MCDM method applied in 37.5% of papers followed by TOPSIS and VIKOR. This review reveals that the use of MCDM methods is one of the most attractive research areas in the field of COVID-19. As a result, one of the main purposes of this work is to identify diverse applications of MCDM methods in the COVID-19 pandemic. Most studies i.e. 69% (49 papers) of the papers combined various fuzzy sets with MCDM methods to overcome the problem of uncertainty and ambiguity while analyzing information. Nevertheless, the main drawback of those papers has been the lack of theoretical justifications. In fact, fuzzy MCDM methods impose heavy computational load and there is no general consensus on the clear advantage of fuzzy methods over crisp methods in terms of the solution quality. We hope the researchers who applied fuzzy MCDM methods to COVID-19-related research understand the theoretical basis of MCDM methods and the serious challenges associated with basic operations of fuzzy numbers to avoid potential disadvantages. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge via suggesting a deep vision to critique the fuzzy MCDM methods from mathematical perspective.
© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Fuzzy arithmetic; Fuzzy set; Multi-criteria decision making; Systematic review

Year:  2022        PMID: 35795407      PMCID: PMC9245376          DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Soft Comput        ISSN: 1568-4946            Impact factor:   8.263


  67 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz; Rafael Ibarra-Contreras; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review.

Authors:  Atousa Soltani; Kasun Hewage; Bahareh Reza; Rehan Sadiq
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 7.145

3.  COVID-19 as the Leading Cause of Death in the United States.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Derek A Chapman; Jong Hyung Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Detection-based prioritisation: Framework of multi-laboratory characteristics for asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers based on integrated Entropy-TOPSIS methods.

Authors:  A S Albahri; Rula A Hamid; O S Albahri; A A Zaidan
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology.

Authors:  Neha Ghorui; Arijit Ghosh; Sankar Prasad Mondal; Mohd Yazid Bajuri; Ali Ahmadian; Soheil Salahshour; Massimiliano Ferrara
Journal:  Results Phys       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.476

6.  Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment.

Authors:  Seda Hezer; Emel Gelmez; Eren Özceylan
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  A calibrated piecewise-linear FGM approach for travel destination recommendation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Toly Chen; Yu-Cheng Wang
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  An extended hesitant fuzzy set using SWARA-MULTIMOORA approach to adapt online education for the control of the pandemic spread of COVID-19 in higher education institutions.

Authors:  Mahyar Kamali Saraji; Abbas Mardani; Mario Köppen; Arunodaya Raj Mishra; Pratibha Rani
Journal:  Artif Intell Rev       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 8.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.