Literature DB >> 25301545

Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review.

Atousa Soltani1, Kasun Hewage1, Bahareh Reza1, Rehan Sadiq2.   

Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) is a complicated process that involves multiple environmental and socio-economic criteria. Decision-makers look for decision support frameworks that can guide in defining alternatives, relevant criteria and their weights, and finding a suitable solution. In addition, decision-making in MSWM problems such as finding proper waste treatment locations or strategies often requires multiple stakeholders such as government, municipalities, industries, experts, and/or general public to get involved. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is the most popular framework employed in previous studies on MSWM; MCDA methods help multiple stakeholders evaluate the often conflicting criteria, communicate their different preferences, and rank or prioritize MSWM strategies to finally agree on some elements of these strategies and make an applicable decision. This paper reviews and brings together research on the application of MCDA for solving MSWM problems with more focus on the studies that have considered multiple stakeholders and offers solutions for such problems. Results of this study show that AHP is the most common approach in consideration of multiple stakeholders and experts and governments/municipalities are the most common participants in these studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Group decision making; Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA); Multiple stakeholder; Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301545     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  10 in total

1.  Multi-criteria decision model for assessing groundwater pollution risk in the urban-rural interface of Mar del Plata City (Argentina).

Authors:  M Lourdes Lima; Asunción Romanelli; Gabriela Calderon; Héctor E Massone
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Distributed mixed-integer fuzzy hierarchical programming for municipal solid waste management. Part I: System identification and methodology development.

Authors:  Guanhui Cheng; Guohe Huang; Cong Dong; Ye Xu; Xiujuan Chen; Jiapei Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kazuva; Jiquan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Macro and micro geo-spatial environment consideration for landfill site selection in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Rami Al-Ruzouq; Abdallah Shanableh; Maher Omar; Ghadeer Al-Khayyat
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.

Authors:  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 8.263

Review 6.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches Applied to Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Samuele Marinello; Rita Gamberini
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-18

7.  Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: A framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments and academia.

Authors:  Rafaela Garbelini Anuardo; Maximilian Espuny; Ana Carolina Ferreira Costa; Otávio José Oliveira
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Range dependent expected utility theory based model for NIMBY conflicts in China: An evolutionary game analysis.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Weihan Wang; Mengran Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Mathematical modeling in municipal solid waste management: case study of Tehran.

Authors:  Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi; Reza Samieifard; Mohammad Ali Abduli; Babak Omidvar
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2016-05-18

10.  Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.

Authors:  Mohamed Hanine; Omar Boutkhoum; Abdessadek Tikniouine; Tarik Agouti
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.