Literature DB >> 35795190

Anti-oxidant Effect of High Dilutions of Arnica montana, Arsenicum Album, and Lachesis Mutus in Microglial Cells in Vitro.

Anne Paumier1, Justine Verre1, Sandra Tribolo1, Naoual Boujedaini1.   

Abstract

Microglial cells play important roles in inflammatory responses. The level of oxidative stress is a well-known marker of inflammation. Homeopathic medicines are often used clinically to alleviate inflammation. We evaluated the anti-oxidative effect of high dilutions of Arnica montana (Arnica m.), Arsenicum album (Arsenicum a.), and Lachesis mutus (Lachesis m.) on production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inflamed microglial cells in vitro. Microglial cells, on exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have induced production of ROS compared with resting cells. The dilutions significantly reduced the oxidative stress by decreasing the level of ROS produced. Arnica m. 1C, 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, and 30C dilutions had a range of ROS reduction between 15 and 42.1%; Arsenicum a. 3C, 5C, 7C, 15C, and 30C dilutions had a range of ROS reduction between 17.6 and 35.3%; and Lachesis m. 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, and 30C dilutions had a range of ROS reduction between 25 and 41.7%. To summarize, the dilutions with the greatest effect were Arnica m. 1C (42.1%), Arsenicum a. 30C (35.3%), and Lachesis m. 7C (41.7%). Arnica m., Arsenicum a., and Lachesis m. did not have the same effect on ROS production and were not dose-dependent.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arnica montana; Arsenicum album; Lachesis mutus; high dilutions; inflammation; microglial cell; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species

Year:  2022        PMID: 35795190      PMCID: PMC9251990          DOI: 10.1177/15593258221103698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.623


Introduction

Inflammation is an essential response of the immune system to a number of harmful stimuli (pathogens, microbial infection, and toxic compounds) thereby ensuring the survival and the protection of cells. The innate immune system consisting of macrophages, microglia (macrophage cells present in the brain), dendritic cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes plays a key role in inflammatory responses. The microglial inflammatory response involves several mediators such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), both hallmarks of inflammation. Under physiological conditions, different ROS exist in equilibrium. However, in pathological conditions, ROS over-production leads to oxidative stress damaging proteins, nucleic acid, lipids, membranes and organelles. High levels of ROS production can activate various transcription factors including NFκB and STAT and induce inflammation. Homeopathic medicines are often used as an anti-inflammatory in clinical practice. The effect of homeopathic medicine has been studied in experimental inflammation in particular Arnica montana, Arsenicum album, and Lachesis mutus.[2-4] The whole plant of Arnica montana has been widely used in European traditional medicine to treat various pathological conditions, including pain, stiffness, and swelling associated with trauma, post-operative clinical conditions. The main active constituents of this plant are flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones such as helenalin having an anti-inflammatory effect. The effect of Arnica montana 6C demonstrated a significant anti-inflammatory effect on carrageenan into rat footpad by reducing the edema intensity. Arsenicum album (arsenic trioxide) although a well-known toxic heavy metalloid, when used at high dilution as a homeopathic drug, alleviates anxiety, stomach pain, food poisoning, urinary infection, and skin irritation. Arsenic exposure increased oxidative stress level, inflammatory cytokines, and apoptosis. However, high dilutions of Arsenicum album improved the inflammation conditions by reducing the oxidative stress markers.[10,11] Venom of the Lachesis muta snake contains enzymes, hemostasis and hemorrhagin toxins, and neurotoxins and cardiovascular toxins. Lachesis mutus which is a homeopathic medicine prepared from the venom of the bushmaster snake is used to treat hot flushes, depression and also for diseases with hemorrhagic tendencies. The snake venom induces a local inflammatory edema. However, homeopathic dilutions of Lachesis mutus 30C reverse the inflammation condition of hypertensive patients. The effect of Lachesis mutus homeopathic dilutions is not well documented. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of action of these homeopathic dilutions is still unknown. In the present study, we investigated the effect of Arnica montana, Lachesis mutus, and Arsenicum album dilutions on the oxidative stress using a microglial cell model in vitro.

Methods

Homeopathic Preparations

Arnica montana (Arnica m.), Arsenicum album (Arsenicum a.), and Lachesis mutus (Lachesis m.) homeopathic dilutions were prepared by Laboratoires Boiron (Messimy, France) according to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) guidelines to produce homeopathic remedies (European Pharmacopoeia, Ninth Edition, Supplement 9.4. EDQM, editor. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe; 2017). Sterile water (OTEC, Aguettant-France) was used as vehicle control. For Arnica m. (from Arnica m. whole plant) and Lachesis m. (from snake venom), the first centesimal (1C) dilution is obtained by dissolving one volume of the mother tincture in ninety-nine volumes of purified sterile water. Then 2C is obtained by mixing one volume of 1C with ninety-nine volumes of purified sterile water. Each dilution is successively subjected to a vigorous agitation called dynamization. For Arnica m., the dilutions tested were 1C, 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C. For Lachesis m., the dilutions tested were 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C. For the preparation of Arsenicum a., the first centesimal (1C) dilution is obtained by trituration using a mortar and pestle with lactose by mixing one part of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) with ninety-nine parts of lactose. Then, 2C is obtained by mixing one part of 1C with ninety-nine parts of lactose. Arsenicum a. 3C is obtained by mixing one volume of 2C with ninety-nine volumes of purified sterile water. The next C dilutions are prepared by repeating the same procedure in order to obtain the other subsequent dilutions in the range. The dilutions tested of Arsenicum a. were 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, and 30C. All procedures for drug preparation and cell treatments were performed in sterile conditions.

Reagents

Leibovitz’s L-15 medium, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium with low glucose (DMEM), Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) without calcium and without magnesium, and 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA and antibiotics cocktail 100X (10,000 U/mL penicillin - 10,000 µg/mL streptomycin) were purchased from Gibco. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) French origin was purchased from Biowest. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) isolated from Escherichia coli 0111:B4, Dexamethasone (DEX), Poly(ethyleneimine) solution (PEI), and Formaldehyde solution (37 wt % in H2O) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich-Merck. Cell proliferation Kit II (XTT) was purchased from Roche Applied Science. CellROX Deep Red Reagent was obtained from Invitrogen Life Technologies.

Primary Culture of Microglia From Newborn Mice

Pregnant female C57BL/6J (Charles River, L’Arbresle, France) were housed, handled, and taken care of in AniRa-PBES (Plateau de Biologie Expérimentale de la Souris, Lyon, France) and in accordance with the European Union Council Directives (2010/63/UE). The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments- University Claude Bernard Lyon I (CEEA-055). Microglial cells were isolated from the brains of postnatal day 0 mouse pups. Briefly, the whole brains were harvested, placed into Leibovitz’s L-15 medium, and were mechanically dissociated. After several centrifugation steps, the pellet of brain cells was resuspended in complete culture medium (DMEM with low glucose supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS and 1% antibiotics cocktail) and plated on PEI-coated Corning® T-75 flask. After a single medium change for removing cellular debris at day two in vitro, the cells were kept for 10 days. Then, some supplemented complete culture medium was added until completion of microglial cell isolation at day 20. The purity of microglial cells was verified at the start of the study by labeling the cells with antibodies, anti-GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein, specific of astrocytes) and anti-Iba-1 (ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1, specific of microglial cells) and analyzed by flow cytometry. The microglial cells were GFAP negative and Iba1 positive (data not shown).

Oxidative Stress Experiments

The cells were seeded on PEI-coated Nunc® TC Nunclon® 48-well plate at a density of 100,000 cells/well. The next day, microglial cells were treated with LPS (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. Treatments with Arnica m., Arsenicum a., and Lachesis m. dilutions (6% v/v), vehicle (6% v/v) were added 4 hours before and 4 hours after initiating the activation with LPS. To inhibit the activation of the cells, the dexamethasone (DEX) which is a glucocorticoid with an anti-inflammatory effect was added at 0.63 µM for 4 hours before LPS activation. All the treatments were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was assessed using the cell-permeant CellROX Deep Red Reagent which is a fluorogenic probe. The reagent exhibits bright near-infrared fluorescence upon oxidation that serves as a direct measurement of ROS levels. The microglial cells were stained with 10 µM CellROX Deep Red reagent for 30 min before the end of the treatments, then washed with DPBS, and fixed with 3.7% formalin solution in DPBS before image acquisition. For each well, three images were randomly acquired with identical exposure parameters using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Axio Observer Z1) equipped with Hamamatsu camera (Orca Flash 4.0) and a LD Plan-Neofluar 20x objective. The quantification of fluorescence was performed using open source ImageJ software with a home-made specific plugin developed by Gly-CRRET lab at University Paris-Est Créteil. Results were expressed as a fractional change in fluorescence intensity relative to baseline in untreated cultures without LPS stimulation.

XTT Viability Assay

The viability of the cells was monitored using XTT viability assay. The tetrazolium salt XTT is reduced to an orange soluble formazan by living cells. The amount of formazan directly correlates to the number of metabolically active cells in the culture. Microglial cells were seeded on PEI-coated Nunc® TC Nunclon® 96-wells plate at the density of 50,000 cells/well. The next day, the cells were treated 4 hours before LPS stimulation with Arnica m., Arsenicum a. and Lachesis m. individual dilutions and vehicle (6% v/v). Then, microglial cells were treated with LPS at 10 ng/mL for 24 hours. At 20 hours after LPS simulation, an XTT labeled mixture was prepared in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and was directly added to each well (final concentration 0.3 mg/mL). After 4 hours of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, corresponding to 24 hours after LPS stimulation, the absorbance at 465 nm (formazan) and at 650 nm (reference wavelength) were quantified using SPARK 10M microplate reader (Tecan). Absorbance values obtained were used to determine the cell viability. Wells without cells were performed and used as blank reference. LPS-treated cells were considered as viability reference (viability ratio = 1).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 7.00). Each result is representative of at least three independent experiments. Shapiro Wilk normality test was used and comparisons were performed using a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn’s post-hoc test to show significant differences against vehicle with LPS. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

Results

Cell Viability

The microglial cells were incubated with LPS (10 ng/mL) and homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. 1C, 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C, Arsenicum a. 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, and 30C, and Lachesis m. 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C. These dilutions did not affect the viability of the cells (Figure 1A, 1B and 1C).
Figure 1.

Viability of LPS-inflamed microglial cells after 24 h exposure to homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. (A), Arsenicum a. (B), Lachesis m. (C), and vehicle. The graph shows the relative cell viability ratio compared with LPS evaluated by XTT assay. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of independent experiments. Inflamed and homeopathic dilutions vs vehicle by Kruskal–Wallis test, ns: not significant.

Viability of LPS-inflamed microglial cells after 24 h exposure to homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. (A), Arsenicum a. (B), Lachesis m. (C), and vehicle. The graph shows the relative cell viability ratio compared with LPS evaluated by XTT assay. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of independent experiments. Inflamed and homeopathic dilutions vs vehicle by Kruskal–Wallis test, ns: not significant.

Effect of ROS production with Arnica m., Arsenicum a., and Lachesis m. dilutions

We evaluated the potential anti-oxidant properties of Arnica m., Arsenicum a., and Lachesis m. with a wide range of potencies in LPS-inflamed microglial cells. When microglial cells were inflamed with LPS (10 ng/mL), the production of ROS significantly increased in a range of 1.6 to 2.3-fold. However, the dexamethasone treatment showed a significant decrease. The addition of the vehicle only did not enhance ROS production compared with LPS. The resting cells (untreated cells) displayed a low level of ROS (Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C; dotted line on the graph equals to one).
Figure 2.

Effect of homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. (A), Arsenicum a. (B), and Lachesis m. (C) on total ROS production in LPS-inflamed microglial cells. The inflamed cells were treated with homeopathic treatments for 24 h and fluorescence intensities of ROS were measured using CellROX Deep Red probe. All the values were normalized by fluorescence value of the untreated cells without LPS stimulation. The dotted line at 1 corresponds to the untreated cells. Data are represented as the mean of three independent experiments and is indicated by a cross. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 vs vehicle by Kruskal–Wallis test. ns: not significant. (LPS: lipopolysaccharide; ROS: reactive oxygen species; DEX: Dexamethasone).

Effect of homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. (A), Arsenicum a. (B), and Lachesis m. (C) on total ROS production in LPS-inflamed microglial cells. The inflamed cells were treated with homeopathic treatments for 24 h and fluorescence intensities of ROS were measured using CellROX Deep Red probe. All the values were normalized by fluorescence value of the untreated cells without LPS stimulation. The dotted line at 1 corresponds to the untreated cells. Data are represented as the mean of three independent experiments and is indicated by a cross. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 vs vehicle by Kruskal–Wallis test. ns: not significant. (LPS: lipopolysaccharide; ROS: reactive oxygen species; DEX: Dexamethasone).

Arnica montana

We tested a large range of dilutions of Arnica m. 1C, 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C on LPS-inflamed microglial cells. The effects of Arnica m. on ROS production are presented in Figure 2A. The results of the treatment of microglial cells with Arnica m. dilutions were consistent and showed a high significant effect on ROS production with the low potencies from 1C to 7C (1.1 to 1.5 vs 1.9 vehicle, ****P<0.0001) by reducing ROS level into the cells. Arnica m. 1C seems to have a similar effect on ROS production compared with dexamethasone. Regarding potencies from 9C to 200C, Arnica m. had a significant decrease of ROS production with 9C (1.6 vs 1.9 vehicle, *P<0.05) and 30C (1.6 vs 1.9 vehicle, **P<0.01) but not a significant effect with 15C and 200C on inflamed microglial cells.

Arsenicum album

The production of ROS (Figure 2B) was measured in LPS-microglial cells with Arsenicum album dilutions. Different potencies of Arsenicum a. 3C, 5C, 7C, and 15C significantly decreased the production of ROS (1.2 to 1.4 (3C, ***P<0.001; 5C, **P<0.01; 7C, *P<0.05) vs 1.7 vehicle). The effect of Arsenicum a. 30C is more pronounced (1.1 vs 1.7 vehicle, ****P<0.0001), whereas Arsenicum a. 9C has no significant effect on the production of ROS compared with vehicle treatment. The 3C, 5C, 7C, 15C, and 30C dilutions of Arsenicum a. all have anti-oxidative properties. These dilutions had lower effects compared with the dexamethasone. The effect Arsenicum a. dilutions on ROS production was a non-linear relationship and the response was an inverted U-shaped dose-effect.

Lachesis Mutus

As reported in Figure 2C, the effect of Lachesis m. 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, 30C, and 200C dilutions was evaluated. The results showed that Lachesis m. dilutions 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, and 30C had a significant diminution of ROS production compared with LPS+vehicle (1.5 to 1.8 Lachesis m. vs 2.4 vehicle, ****P<0.0001 (3C, 5C, 7C, and 9C) and **P<0.01 (15C and 30C)). Interestingly, Lachesis m. 7C dilution seemed to reduce the oxidative stress more efficiently. Noteworthy, this decrease was close to the one observed with the dexamethasone. Only Lachesis m. 200C has no significant effect on the production of ROS compared with vehicle. Overall, most Lachesis m. dilutions tested displayed a significant anti-oxidative activity.

Discussion

The objective of this study was to assess the anti-oxidative effect of homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m., Arsenicum a., and Lachesis m. on mouse microglial cells exposed to LPS (bacterial endotoxin). In this model, LPS initiates inflammation and leads to ROS production. The level of ROS was assessed using the fluorogenic CellROX Deep Red Reagent probe. The effects of a large range of homeopathic dilutions were examined on intracellular ROS generation. In LPS-inflamed microglial cells, Arnica m. 1C, 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, and 30C dilutions significantly decreased ROS production. Arnica m. 1C dilution showed the highest effect by reducing ROS production. This effect on oxidative stress with Arnica m. dilutions that we observed could explain the anti-inflammatory properties and moreover its anti-inflammatory effects as observed in clinical practice. The beneficial effects of Arnica montana are well documented. The main active compound responsible for biological effects of Arnica montana is the sesquiterpene lactone helenalin. One of the targets of helenalin is the transcription factor NFkB by inhibiting the inflammatory cytokines secretion. Helenalin (around 0.5-1 µM) incubated with THP-1, Jurkat cells, and PBMC induced a cell growth inhibition because the helenalin showed a cytotoxicity. This compound on cells enhanced the formation on intracellular ROS. However, the homeopathic dilutions of Arnica montana 30C on E. coli exposed to UV showed less DNA damage and less oxidative stress by decreasing ROS generation and increasing in SOD, CAT and GSH activities. Moreover, Arnica montana 6C was investigated by Macedo et al. on carrageenan and rat paw edema induced by nyastatin where they demonstrated the efficacy of Arnica montana 6C when it is administrated as a pre-treatment before the inflammation. The application of 20% Arnica ointment was able to reduce bruising more effectively than placebo. After a rhinoplasty surgery, a study showed that the application of local Arnica and mucopolysaccharide polysulfate cream reduced the edema and ecchymosis.[5,20] Other studies demonstrated that Arnica montana has an anti-inflammatory potential. The oral administration of Arnica montana flower methanol extract (AMME) alleviated both inflammation (TNF∝, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12) and nitric oxide (NO) in a collagen-induced arthritis rat model. On murine macrophages, the AMME significantly reduced the protein levels of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and also decreased the production of TNFα and IL-12. homeopathic dilutions of Arnica m. reduced intracellular ROS production in LPS-inflamed microglial cells. Furthermore, the action of high dilutions over Avogadro’s number, corresponding to a homeopathic dilution beyond the 12C, is still present on microglial cells. In our study, Arsenicum a. 3C, 5C, 7C, 15C, and 30C dilutions significantly decreased the oxidative stress in inflamed microglial cells. Arsenicum a. 30C dilution had the highest effect by reducing ROS production compared to the other dilutions. Arsenic can cause DNA damage and generates ROS. Arsenic exposure increases oxidative damage to lipids and proteins and decreases the levels of antioxidants. Arsenic induced cardiovascular disease, skin lesion, and immunological disorders causes inflammation and increase of oxidative stress.[22,23] Epidemiologic evidence identified a link between arsenic exposure with markers of endothelial dysfunction such as soluble ICAM-1 and soluble VCAM-1 in plasma associated with CVD. On the other hand, Arsenicum album 30C allows greater elimination of arsenic in the urine of patients poisoned with arsenic. Moreover, Arsenicum album 30C prevents the fever following DPT-HepB-Polio vaccination (Diphtheria-Pertusis-Tetanus). Arsenicum album 30C administration reduced arsenic toxicity in E. coli by inhibiting generation of ROS.

Lachesis mutus

Finally, Lachesis m. 3C, 5C, 7C, 9C, 15C, and 30C dilutions significantly reduced the oxidative stress level in microglial cells. Lachesis m. 7C had the highest effect by reducing ROS production compared to the other dilutions. When envenomation happens, the venom interacts with cells and becomes an activator of the immune cytokines such as TNFα and prostaglandins. It triggers spontaneous hemorrhage, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, coagulation disorders, hypotension cardiovascular shock, and renal malfunction.[28,29] Lachesis mutus 30C is usually prescribed for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension and therefore reduces inflammation. Lachesis muta 30C significantly reduces the blood pressure levels on hypertensive patients. The traditionally use of these three homeopathic medicines is to relieve inflammation. While the mechanism of action of these three homeopathic medicines is still unknown, this study demonstrates their anti-inflammatory properties through reducing ROS production.

Conclusion

Overall, these data demonstrated that the most homeopathic dilutions of Arnica montana, Arsenicum album, and Lachesis mutus tested have a potential effect to alleviate inflammation by reducing the oxidative stress level in LPS-inflamed microglial cells whereas the vehicle alone had no effect on oxidative stress. Arnica montana, Arsenicum album, and Lachesis mutus did not have the same impact on ROS production. Moreover, the effect of high dilutions of these three treatments was not dose-dependent. Our results obtained with homeopathic dilutions of Arnica montana support the anti-inflammatory effect already described in clinical studies.
  26 in total

1.  Potentiated homeopathic drug Arsenicum Album 30C inhibits intracellular reactive oxygen species generation and up-regulates expression of arsenic resistance gene in arsenite-exposed bacteria Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Arnab De; Durba Das; Suman Dutta; Debrup Chakraborty; Naoual Boujedaini; Anisur Rahman Khuda-Bukhsh
Journal:  Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao       Date:  2012-02

2.  Differential effects of Helenalin, an anti-inflammatory sesquiterpene lactone, on the proteome, metabolome and the oxidative stress response in several immune cell types.

Authors:  Paula Zwicker; Nadin Schultze; Sarah Niehs; Dirk Albrecht; Karen Methling; Martina Wurster; Gerhild Wachlin; Michael Lalk; Ulrike Lindequist; Beate Haertel
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Accelerated resolution of laser-induced bruising with topical 20% arnica: a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Leu; J Havey; L E White; N Martin; S S Yoo; A W Rademaker; M Alam
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Inflammatory oedema induced by Lachesis muta muta (Surucucu) venom and LmTX-I in the rat paw and dorsal skin.

Authors:  Tatiane Ferreira; Enilton A Camargo; Maria Teresa C P Ribela; Daniela C Damico; Sérgio Marangoni; Edson Antunes; Gilberto De Nucci; Elen C T Landucci
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  A simplified approach for efficient isolation of functional microglial cells: Application for modeling neuroinflammatory responses in vitro.

Authors:  Julia E Sepulveda-Diaz; Mohand O Ouidja; Sergio B Socias; Sabah Hamadat; Serge Guerreiro; Rita Raisman-Vozari; Patrick P Michel
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 7.452

6.  Anti-inflammatory activity of Arnica montana 6cH: preclinical study in animals.

Authors:  S B Macêdo; L R Ferreira; F F Perazzo; J C Carvalho
Journal:  Homeopathy       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 7.  Effectiveness and Safety of Arnica montana in Post-Surgical Setting, Pain and Inflammation.

Authors:  Tommaso Iannitti; Julio César Morales-Medina; Paolo Bellavite; Valentina Rottigni; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.688

8.  Evaluation of inhibitory activities of plant extracts on production of LPS-stimulated pro-inflammatory mediators in J774 murine macrophages.

Authors:  Nandini Verma; Subhash K Tripathi; Debasis Sahu; Hasi R Das; Rakha H Das
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  Can homeopathic arsenic remedy combat arsenic poisoning in humans exposed to groundwater arsenic contamination?: a preliminary report on first human trial.

Authors:  Anisur Rahman Khuda-Bukhsh; Surajit Pathak; Bibhas Guha; Susanta Roy Karmakar; Jayanta Kumar Das; Pathikrit Banerjee; Surjyo Jyoti Biswas; Partha Mukherjee; Nandini Bhattacharjee; Sandipan Chaki Choudhury; Antara Banerjee; Suman Bhadra; Palash Mallick; Jayati Chakrabarti; Biswapati Mandal
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Urine Arsenic and Arsenic Metabolites in U.S. Adults and Biomarkers of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Endothelial Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Shohreh F Farzan; Caitlin G Howe; Michael S Zens; Thomas Palys; Jacqueline Y Channon; Zhigang Li; Yu Chen; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.