| Literature DB >> 29373859 |
Shohreh F Farzan1, Caitlin G Howe1, Michael S Zens2, Thomas Palys3, Jacqueline Y Channon4,5, Zhigang Li6, Yu Chen7, Margaret R Karagas2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arsenic (As) exposure has been associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and with biomarkers of potential CVD risk and inflammatory processes. However, few studies have evaluated the effects of As on such biomarkers in U.S. populations, which are typically exposed to low to moderate As concentrations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29373859 PMCID: PMC5963594 DOI: 10.1289/EHP2062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Demographic characteristics of study participants ().
| Characteristic | Minimum | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 26 | 60 | 66 | 70 | 75 | |
| Age | 235 (56.2) | |||||
| Men | 254 (60.8) | |||||
| Women | 164 (39.2) | |||||
| BMI ( | 16.1 | 24.4 | 27.4 | 31.8 | 49.1 | |
| High school education or less | 160 (38.3) | |||||
| College educated or higher | 258 (61.7) | |||||
| Currently married | 334 (79.9) | |||||
| Alcohol consumption status | ||||||
| Never drinker | 64 (15.3) | |||||
| Former drinker | 52 (12.7) | |||||
| Current drinker | 151 (36.1) | |||||
| Current drinker | 150 (35.9) | |||||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Never smoker | 157 (37.6) | |||||
| Former smoker | 203 (48.6) | |||||
| Current smoker | 58 (13.9) | |||||
| Fish consumption | ||||||
| Consumed fish | 361 (88.9) | |||||
| Consumed fish | 45 (11.1) | |||||
| Missing fish consumption | 12 | |||||
| Urine specific gravity | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.04 |
Note: Data are complete for all variables unless otherwise indicated. All measured variables were above the limit of detection (LOD) unless otherwise indicated. BMI, body mass index.
Descriptive information on As exposure and outcome biomarkers among study participants ().
| Arsenic exposure | Minimum | 25th percentile | Median | 75th percentile | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water As ( | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 110.5 | |
| Water As below LOD | 17 (4.1) | |||||
| Water arsenic | 394 (94.7) | |||||
| Water arsenic | 22 (5.3) | |||||
| Water arsenic | 4 (1.0) | |||||
| Missing water As | 2 (0.5) | |||||
| Toenail As ( | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 507.2 | |
| Total uAs, excluding arsenobetaine ( | 0.8 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 8.2 | 103 | |
| Missing total uAs | 15 (3.3) | |||||
| Urinary arsenobetaine ( | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.7 | 26.2 | 1276.1 | |
| Urinary arsenobetaine below LOD | 5 (1.2) | |||||
| Missing urinary arsenobetaine | 15 (3.3) | |||||
| %uiAs | 0.7 | 4.6 | 7.3 | 10.3 | 38.6 | |
| %uMMA | 1.0 | 7.4 | 10.2 | 13.1 | 29.2 | |
| %uDMA | 38.3 | 76.7 | 82.0 | 87.1 | 97.7 | |
| Missing %As metabolites | 15 (3.3) | |||||
| Outcome biomarkers | ||||||
| Plasma VCAM-1 (ng/mL) | 1.4 | 166.3 | 201.9 | 260.4 | 1084.9 | |
| Plasma VCAM-1 below LOD | 3 (0.8) | |||||
| Missing plasma VCAM-1 | 22 (5.2) | |||||
| Plasma ICAM-1 (ng/mL) | 0.9 | 234.8 | 311.3 | 402.3 | 1245.0 | |
| Plasma ICAM-1 below LOD | 3 (0.8) | |||||
| Missing ICAM-1 | 22 (5.2) | |||||
| Plasma MMP-9 (pg/mL) | 148 | 530 | 800 | 1407 | 7216 | |
| Missing plasma MMP-9 | 22 (5.2) | |||||
| Plasma | 22 | 98 | 130 | 166 | 2995 | |
| Missing plasma | 22 (5.2) | |||||
| Plasma PAI-1 (ng/mL) | 14.8 | 26.6 | 36.3 | 46.5 | 141.1 | |
| Missing plasma PAI-1 | 51 (12.2) | |||||
| Urine | 0.3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 33.8 |
Note: Data are complete for all variables unless otherwise indicated. All measured variables were above the LOD unless otherwise indicated. , ; As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; LOD, limit of detection; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; , tumor necrosis ; uAs, urine arsenic; %uDMA, proportion of dimethyl arsenical species in urine; %uiAs, proportion of inorganic arsenical species in urine; %uMMA, proportion of monomethyl arsenical species in urine; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
No values for total uAs were below the LOD because total uAs is calculated as a sum of As metabolite measures, and any As metabolites below the LOD were imputed to before variable calculation.
Any As metabolites below the LOD were imputed to before calculation of metabolite percentages.
Percent difference (95% CI) in outcome biomarkers for a doubling of arsenic exposure biomarkers.
| Biomarker | Toenail As | Urinary As | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent difference (95% CI) | Percent difference (95% CI) | |||||
| VCAM-1 | 396 | 1.70 (0.20, 3.22) | 0.03 | 347 | 0.15 | |
| ICAM-1 | 396 | 1.46 ( | 0.08 | 347 | 0.21 | |
| MMP-9 | 396 | 0.03 | 347 | 3.25 ( | 0.45 | |
| 396 | 0.23 ( | 0.72 | 347 | 0.23 | ||
| PAI-1 | 367 | 0.85 ( | 0.19 | 322 | 0.66 | |
| 418 | 1.65 (0.03, 3.29) | 0.05 | 403 | 8.77 (3.15, 14.69) | ||
Note: Percent difference was calculated using the following formula: , where is the arsenic coefficient from linear regression models in which both the arsenic exposure variable and the biomarker were natural log–transformed. Models were adjusted for sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking status, and analytic batch. Urine arsenic analyses were additionally adjusted for ln(specific gravity–adjusted arsenobetaine). , ; As, arsenic; CI, confidence interval; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; uAs, urine arsenic; , tumor necrosis ; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
For models, uAs was not adjusted for specific gravity. Instead, specific gravity was included as a covariate in models.
Percent difference (95% CI) in outcome biomarkers for a 5% increase in arsenic metabolites.
| Biomarker | %uiAs | %uMMA | %uDMA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent difference (95% CI) | Percent difference (95% CI) | Percent difference (95% CI) | |||||
| VCAM-1 | 347 | 2.30 ( | 0.39 | 3.76 ( | 0.27 | 0.23 | |
| ICAM-1 | 347 | 3.30 ( | 0.25 | 1.99 ( | 0.58 | 0.28 | |
| MMP-9 | 347 | 0.62 | 0.17 | 2.62 ( | 0.28 | ||
| 347 | 0.95 | 0.42 | 0.73 ( | 0.62 | |||
| PAI-1 | 322 | 1.44 ( | 0.52 | 1.68 ( | 0.27 | ||
| 403 | 0.97 ( | 0.69 | 7.92 (2.10, 14.07) | 0.07 | |||
Note: The percent difference was calculated using the following formula: , where is the arsenic coefficient from linear regression models in which only the outcome biomarker variable was natural log–transformed. Models were adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, alcohol status, analytic batch, ln[specific gravity (SG)–adjusted arsenobetaine], and ln(SG-adjusted uAs). In models evaluating urinary arsenic, SG was included as a covariate in models and urinary measures (uAs, urinary arsenobetaine, and ) were not adjusted for SG. , ; CI, confidence interval; uAs, total urine arsenic; %uDMA, proportion of dimethyl arsenical species in urine; %uiAs, proportion of inorganic arsenical species in urine; %uMMA, proportion of monomethyl arsenical species in urine.