Literature DB >> 35795018

Can fisheries bioenergetics modelling refine spatially explicit assessments of climate change vulnerability?

Matthew J Troia1, Joshuah S Perkin2.   

Abstract

Rising water temperature under climate change is affecting the physiology, population dynamics and geographic distribution of freshwater taxa. We propose a novel application of individual-based bioenergetics modelling (BEM) to assess the physiological impacts of warming on freshwater fishes across broad spatial extents. We test this approach using the Guadalupe bass (Micropterus treculii), a species of conservation and recreational significance that is endemic to central TX, USA. We projected historical-to-future changes (middle 20th century to end of 21st century) in daily bioenergetics of individual fish across 7872 stream reaches and compared this output to changes in reach occupancy derived from traditional species distribution modelling (SDM). SDMs project an 8.7% to 52.1% decrease in reach occupancy, depending on model parameterizations and climate change scenarios. Persistence is projected in the central Edwards Plateau region, whereas extirpations are projected for the warmer southeastern region. BEM projected a median 79.3% and 143.2% increase in somatic growth of age-1 Guadalupe bass across historically occupied reaches under moderate and severe climate change scenarios, respectively. Higher end-of-year body size under future climate was caused by a longer growing season. Future scenarios exploring suppressed or enhanced prey consumption suggest that small changes in prey availability will have relatively greater effects on growth than forecasted changes in temperature. Projected growth was geographically discordant with SDM-based habitat suitability, suggesting that SDMs do not accurately reflect fundamental thermal niche dimensions. Our assessment suggests that for locations where the species persists, Guadalupe bass may benefit from warming, although realized consumption gains will depend on seasonal, spatially varying changes in prey availability and other biotic and abiotic factors. More generally, we demonstrate that uniting species-specific BEM with spatially explicit climate change projections can elucidate the physiological impacts of climate change-including seasonal variation-on freshwater fishes across broad geographic extents to complement traditional SDM.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35795018      PMCID: PMC9252126          DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coac035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Physiol        ISSN: 2051-1434            Impact factor:   3.252


  25 in total

1.  Does including physiology improve species distribution model predictions of responses to recent climate change?

Authors:  Lauren B Buckley; Stephanie A Waaser; Heidi J MacLean; Richard Fox
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Squeezed at the top: Interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds.

Authors:  Jill E Jankowski; Scott K Robinson; Douglas J Levey
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming.

Authors:  Michael E Dillon; George Wang; Raymond B Huey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges.

Authors:  Michael Kearney; Warren Porter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Niche syndromes, species extinction risks, and management under climate change.

Authors:  Dov F Sax; Regan Early; Jesse Bellemare
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Unpacking the mechanisms captured by a correlative species distribution model to improve predictions of climate refugia.

Authors:  Natalie J Briscoe; Michael R Kearney; Chris A Taylor; Brendan A Wintle
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Locally Downscaled and Spatially Customizable Climate Data for Historical and Future Periods for North America.

Authors:  Tongli Wang; Andreas Hamann; Dave Spittlehouse; Carlos Carroll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Continental-scale assessment of risk to the Australian odonata from climate change.

Authors:  Alex A Bush; David A Nipperess; Daisy E Duursma; Gunther Theischinger; Eren Turak; Lesley Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The MIAmaxent R package: Variable transformation and model selection for species distribution models.

Authors:  Julien Vollering; Rune Halvorsen; Sabrina Mazzoni
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.