Literature DB >> 22352161

Does including physiology improve species distribution model predictions of responses to recent climate change?

Lauren B Buckley1, Stephanie A Waaser, Heidi J MacLean, Richard Fox.   

Abstract

Thermal constraints on development are often invoked to predict insect distributions. These constraints tend to be characterized in species distribution models (SDMs) by calculating development time based on a constant lower development temperature (LDT). Here, we assessed whether species-specific estimates of LDT based on laboratory experiments can improve the ability of SDMs to predict the distribution shifts of six U.K. butterflies in response to recent climate warming. We find that species-specific and constant (5 degrees C) LDT degree-day models perform similarly at predicting distributions during the period of 1970-1982. However, when the models for the 1970-1982 period are projected to predict distributions in 1995-1999 and 2000-2004, species-specific LDT degree-day models modestly outperform constant LDT degree-day models. Our results suggest that, while including species-specific physiology in correlative models may enhance predictions of species' distribution responses to climate change, more detailed models may be needed to adequately account for interspecific physiological differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22352161     DOI: 10.1890/11-0066.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

1.  Temperature Effect on the Development of Tropical Dragonfly Eggs.

Authors:  F Z Mendonça; J V Bernardy; C E K Oliveira; P B G Oliveira; P De Marco
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Can fisheries bioenergetics modelling refine spatially explicit assessments of climate change vulnerability?

Authors:  Matthew J Troia; Joshuah S Perkin
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Using insights from animal behaviour and behavioural ecology to inform marine conservation initiatives.

Authors:  Rohan M Brooker; William E Feeney; James R White; Rachel P Manassa; Jacob L Johansen; Danielle L Dixson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Autumn larval cold tolerance does not predict the northern range limit of a widespread butterfly species.

Authors:  Philippe Tremblay; Heath A MacMillan; Heather M Kharouba
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Moving forward in global-change ecology: capitalizing on natural variability.

Authors:  Inés Ibáñez; Elise S Gornish; Lauren Buckley; Diane M Debinski; Jessica Hellmann; Brian Helmuth; Janneke Hillerislambers; Andrew M Latimer; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Maria Uriarte
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Live Fast, Die Young: Experimental Evidence of Population Extinction Risk due to Climate Change.

Authors:  Elvire Bestion; Aimeric Teyssier; Murielle Richard; Jean Clobert; Julien Cote
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Range expansion through fragmented landscapes under a variable climate.

Authors:  Jonathan Bennie; Jenny A Hodgson; Callum R Lawson; Crispin T R Holloway; David B Roy; Tom Brereton; Chris D Thomas; Robert J Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  CLIMBER: Climatic niche characteristics of the butterflies in Europe.

Authors:  Oliver Schweiger; Alexander Harpke; Martin Wiemers; Josef Settele
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Mechanistic species distribution modelling as a link between physiology and conservation.

Authors:  Tyler G Evans; Sarah E Diamond; Morgan W Kelly
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  What is conservation physiology? Perspectives on an increasingly integrated and essential science(†).

Authors:  Steven J Cooke; Lawren Sack; Craig E Franklin; Anthony P Farrell; John Beardall; Martin Wikelski; Steven L Chown
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.