| Literature DB >> 35794650 |
Nicola D'Ascenzo1,2, Emanuele Antonecchia3,4, Antonella Angiolillo5, Victor Bender4, Marco Camerlenghi6, Qingguo Xie7,8,9, Alfonso Di Costanzo10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the second most frequent degenerative disorder, the risk of which increases with age. A preclinical PD diagnostic test does not exist. We identify PD blood metabolites and metabolic pathways significantly correlated with age to develop personalized age-dependent PD blood biomarkers.Entities:
Keywords: Age; Biomarkers; Metabolomics; Parkinson’s Disease
Year: 2022 PMID: 35794650 PMCID: PMC9258166 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00831-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biosci ISSN: 2045-3701 Impact factor: 9.584
Description of the participants included in the statistical analysis
| Parameter | HC | PD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 73 ± 7.1 | 71 ± 6.4 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 27/12 | 27/12 |
| Scholarity | 12.1 ± 3.9 | 11.02 ± 4.1 |
| MMSE | 28.5 ± 2.4 | 25.4 ± 2.3 |
| UPDRS | 55.3 ± 24.4 | |
| Hoehn and Yahr score | 2.4 ± 0.6 | |
| GDS | 2.5 ± 2.4 | 4.7 ± 3.0 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 26.3 ± 2.0 | 26.5 ± 2.3 |
| Smoke | 62% | 30% |
| Alcohol | 50% | 44% |
| Hypertension | 41% | 42% |
| Diabetes | 13% | 15% |
| Dysplidemia | 45% | 32% |
| TIA/stroke | 3% | 12% |
| Myocardial infarction | 5% | 9% |
| Antihypertensive drugs | 42% | 46% |
| Hypoglycemic drugs | 13% | 11% |
| Lipid-lowering drugs | 44% | 22% |
| Antiplatelet drugs | 11% | 22% |
Fig. 1Data driven modeling for the discrimination between PD and HC subjects. The PLS model exhibits a good separation between the two categories of subjects (A) and its goodness is apparently confirmed by a resampling with replacement validation technique (B). However, we observe a non-negligible overfitting (C). With respect to PLS, the OPLS model exhibits a better separation between the two classes (D), confirmed with a P-value of 9 × 10–4 (E) and absence of overfitting (F)
Selection of the significant metabolites
| Type | Name | fi | C | Name | fi | C | Name | fi | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acylcarnitines | Carnitine | 0.9 | Tiglyl- | 0.0 | |||||
| Pimelyl- | 1.1* | ||||||||
| Butenyl- | 1.2* | Dodecenoyl- | 0.5* | ||||||
| Methylmalonyl | 2.4 | ||||||||
| Alkaloids | Trigonellyne | 1.1 | |||||||
| Amine oxids | Trimethylamine N-oxide | 1.7* | |||||||
| Amino acid related | Asymmetric Dimethylargin | 0.9 | Citrulline | 1.1 | Kynurenine | 0.8 | |||
| 1-Methylhistidine | 0.8 | ||||||||
| Amino acids | Cysteine | 1.2 | Glutamine | 1.1 | Glutamic Acid | 2 | 0.8 | ||
| Threonine | 1.2* | ||||||||
| Bile acids | Cholic acid | 2.0 | Chenodeoxy acid | 1.9* | Deoxycholic acid | 1.4 | |||
| Glycolithochol acid* | 1.4 | Glycolithochol Acid sulfate | 1.2* | ||||||
| Biogenic Amines | Gamma-amino butyracid | 0.8* | Putrescine | 1.6* | Serotonin | 0.2 | |||
| Ceramides | d16:1/24:0 | 1.3 | d18:1/20:0 | 1 | 1.2 | d18:1/26:1 | 1.3* | ||
| d18:1/16:0 | 1 | 1.1 | d18:1/24:0 | 1.2 | d18:2/18:0 | 1 | 1.1 | ||
| d18:1/18:0 | 1 | 1.2 | d18:2/20:0 | 1.2* | |||||
| d18:0/26:1OH | 10.3 | d18:1/24:4 | 1.2 | d18:2/24:0 | 1 | 1.2 | |||
| d18:1/20:0 (OH) | 1.2 | d18:1/22:0 | 1 | 1.2 | d18:2/24:1 | 1 | 1.2 | ||
| Cholesteryl esters | 16:1 | 0.9 | 22:5 | 1.1* | 20:4 | 1 | 0.9 | ||
| 17:1 | 1.1 | ||||||||
| Cresols | p-Cresol sulfate | 1.2 | |||||||
| Diglycerides | 16:1_18:0 | 0.8 | 16:1_18:1 | 0.9 | 18:2_18:4 | 0.7 | |||
| 16:0_18:1 | 0.9 | 17:0_18:1 | 0.9 | 18:1_18:1 | 2 | 0.9 | |||
| 16:0_20:3 | 0.8* | 16:1_20:0 | 4.6* | 18:2_18:2 | 1.4* | ||||
| Dihexosyl ceramides | d18:1/14:0 | 1.1 | d18:1/20:0 | 1 | 1.2 | d18:0/26:1 | 1.2 | ||
| d18:1/24:0 | 1 | 1.1 | |||||||
| d18:1/18:0 | 1 | 1.2 | |||||||
| Fatty acids | Eicosapent | 0.7* | |||||||
| Eicosatrienoic | 0.3* | Eicosenoic | 0.6* | ||||||
| Hexosyl ceramides | d18:1/23:0 | 1 | 1.1 | d18:2/18:0 | 1 | 1.2 | |||
| d18:1/18:1 | 1 | 1.1 | d18:1/26:0 | 1 | 1.1 | d18:2/23:0 | 1 | 1.2 | |
| Hormones | Cortisol | 1.2* | Cortisone | 0.9 | |||||
| Indoles | Indoleacetic acid | 1.7* | Indolepropionic acid | 0.7 | Indoxylsulfate | 0.7* | |||
| Lyso-phosphatidyl | LysoPC(18:2) | 1.2* | LysoPC(28:1) | 0.8* | |||||
| Phosphatidyl-cholines | aaC34:1 | 1 | 1.1 | aaC36:3 | 1 | aeC32:2 | 1 | 1.1 | |
| aaC32:0 | 1 | 1.1 | aaC38:1 | 1 | 1.1 | aeC34:3 | 1 | 1.2 | |
| aaC32:2 | 1 | 1.2 | aeC34:2 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||
| aaC34:2 | 2 | 1.2 | aeC44:6 | 2 | 1.2 | ||||
| aaC34:3 | 2 | 1.1 | aeC36:3 | 1 | 1.3 | ||||
| aaC36:2 | 1 | 1.1 | aeC38:4 | 1 | 0.9 | aeC38:0 | 4 | 1.1 | |
| aeC44:4 | 2 | 1.2 | |||||||
| Sphingomyelins | Hydro-SM(14:1) | 0.9 | SM(22:3) | 0.6 | |||||
| Hydro-SM(16:1) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(16:1) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(24:0) | 0.9 | ||
| Hydro-SM(22:1) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(18:0) | 1 | 0.9 | ||||
| Hydro-SM(22:2) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(18:1) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(26:0) | 0.9 | ||
| Hydro-SM(24:1) | 1 | 0.9 | SM(20:2) | 1 | 0.9 | ||||
| Triglycerides | |||||||||
| Trihexosyl ceramides | (d18:1/16:0) | 1.1* | (d18:1/18:0) | 1.1* | (d18:1/24:1) | 1.1* | |||
| (d18:1/26:1) | 1.1* | ||||||||
| Vitamins |
The table contains the association of each element to the respective principal component f1, f2, or f3 (if significant). C indicates the ratio between the concentration of the metabolite in PD and HC: values higher or lower than 1.0 indicates, respectively, elevated or decreased metabolite level in PD. The asterisk (*) indicates parameters validated with OPLS. Parameters in bold are additionally cross-validated with PCA. The complete list of Triglycerides is in the Additional file 1: Table S2. We show here only these Triglycerides cross-validated with PCA
Fig. 2The OPLS model with 3 orthogonal and 1 predictive components can distinguish between PD and HC with an AUC in the range (0.97, 1.0) at a 95% confidence level (A). The principal component analysis applied to the significant metabolic parameters with VIP > 1 identifies 5 components expressing up to 80% of the total variance. In particular, f0,1,4 does not exhibit any age dependence (B), f2 exhibits a age correlation only for PD patients (C) and f3 exhibits a age correlation only for HC subjects (D). Sphingomyelin (E), Choline (F) and Hexadecanoyl-carnitine (G) are among the main contributions to the three principal components
Fig. 3Pathway analysis. The box plots of 8 significant metabolomic parameters validated in OPLS reveal a difference of the concentration between PD and HC subjects (A). An enrichment analysis verifies that the selected parameters can be associated with the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, the tryptophan metabolism and the glycine, serine and threonine metabolism (B). We verified that the metabolites composing the first and the third pathway are correlated with age only in HG and PD subjects, respectively