Relationship between demoralization of the college student with their individual- and social-oriented self.

Demoralization has become increasingly prevalent among college students who have lost motivation in life and feel hopeless about their future. Many college students who demonstrate symptoms of demoralization are neglected because they might fail to typical symptoms of depression. Taiwanese college students are simultaneously influenced by bicultural-self system, such as individual- and social-oriented views of self, which vary considerably in the view of self, achievement motivation, and the value of self-realization, and may even create contradictory expectations and behavioral standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of the relationship between attitude towards demoralization, individual- and social-oriented views of self. Three-hundred fifty-six college students completed the online questionnaire, which was designed to explore their demoralization status and cultural differences. Four groups were divided into bicultural self, individual-oriented self, social-oriented self, and unintegrated self. Bicultural group demonstrated significantly lower demoralization overall scores than other groups. Moreover, the five dimensions of demoralization in college students were mostly significantly and negatively correlated with individual- and social-oriented views of self, indicating that college students' bicultural views of self may contribute to or prevent demoralization.

Introduction

In college, many students seem to be confused regarding their future, career, life purpose, or even feel that no goal is worth their efforts. However, they do not meet the diagnostic criteria for depression. Demoralization is more accurately to reflects the condition in the college students who have lost morale and hope. It is noteworthy that demoralization is conceptually different from depression.

Demoralization and depression are two different entities whereby the former involves helplessness and hopelessness and the latter entails anhedonia [1-3]. Moreover, depressed people are hardly joyful during the present and future times whereas demoralized people could be joyful at the present moment but feeling gloomy towards the future [4]. Demoralization can be regarded as the result of individuals’ difficulty in developing meaning in life [5], referring to a goal that gives individuals a sense of direction and value. Therefore, the social environment in which people live determines the type of people they wish to become [6, 7], and the social expectations and the cultural values might influence people’s view of self and the meaning of life [8].

Cultural values directly affect the development of the meaning of life in college students, and two substantially different cultural value systems coexist in Taiwan, namely social-oriented and individual-oriented cultural values [9]. The individual- and social-oriented views of self can coexist in a person. Yang [10] suggested that the values of submission to authority, conservatism and endurance in Taiwanese college students. Male dominance has been gradually replaced by gender equality, but filial piety and ancestral worship as well as fatalism and defensiveness still coexist with optimism and assertiveness, independence and self-reliance, and respect for emotions despite changes in the social environment. In addition, previous studies have reported that self-construal in Taiwanese people is neither completely interdependent (traditional values) nor completely independent (modern and Western values); instead, Taiwanese people develop a composite self in which the two cultural value coexist. Each of the two cultural value systems can form the basis of an individual’s ideal self and thereby provide meaning in life, but whether the two can be effectively integrated remains uncertain. As college students enter the workforce where two contrasting cultural value systems coexist, whether they manage to develop a composite self or bicultural self that integrates two systems is of great importance [9]. The coexistence of two value systems may lead to intergenerational cultural and value conflicts within college students. However, the causes and countermeasures of the currently prevalent demoralization among Taiwanese college students have yet to be confirmed by relevant research.

The present study thus aimed to investigate how college students’ demoralization influence by cultural values. In the following sections, we first briefly reviewed the definition of demoralization followed by the review of the existing literatures of demoralization and social-/individual-oriented cultural values. Then, we provided an overview of the present study.

Demoralization

Demoralization has been described as a psychological state characterized by helplessness, hopelessness, a sense of failure and the inability to cope (for a review, see [11]). Demoralization is defined as troubles in lives whereby affected individuals would feel helpless, meaningless, hopeless, remorse and so on when facing life problems [1, 2]. Clinically, demoralization is a new diagnostic concept when they discovered that patients with affective disorders and patients with schizophrenia showed the same psychological condition: loss of meaning, goals, and hope in life; a pessimistic attitude toward the future; alienation and lack of support; and lack of motivation to navigate through life [12]. Previous studies have purposed a various psychological well-being dimensions which are associated with an individual’s development of optimal functioning: positive evaluation of one’s self, the belief that life is purposeful and meaningful, the possession of quality relationships with others, a sense of continued growth and development, a sense of mastery over one’s environment, and a sense of self-determination [11, 13]. However, demoralization is opposed to psychological well-being. Previous studies have showed that patients demonstrated worse psychological well-being scores and significantly higher rates of demoralization [11, 14, 15].

Kissane et al. [12] suggested that demoralization is a manifestation of existential distress, and they developed the first version of the Demoralization Scale, including five dimensions: such as loss of meaning, despair, disheartened feelings, helpless feelings, and a sense of failure. The scale was consisting of 24 items with 5-point Likert scale for participants’ self-report demoralization syndrome. In their study, they recruited 100 patients with advanced cancer (47 males and 53 females) to examine the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from .71 to .94) [16]. Moreover, factor analysis revealed five factors: loss of meaning (loss of meaning and worth connected to role and value in life), dysphoria (unspecific emotions of grief and regret), disheartenment (sense of isolation connected to frustration and loneliness), helplessness (subjective incompetence involving loss of control, hope and so on) and sense of failure (reversed sense of accomplishment, satisfaction and success in life translating into sense of failure).

Hung et al. [2] translated Kissane’s Demoralization Scale into Mandarin version and tested its reliability and validity. They used the same five factors as Kissane et al. [16], and the .928 Cronbach’s alpha was reliable. Hung [17] modified the Mandarin version of the Demoralization Scale for investigating teenagers self-report demoralization syndrome, and five factors were meaning of life (satisfaction with the current life and self-identification), loneliness and helplessness (subjective feelings of isolation, lack of support or inability to receive assistance from others), self-assurance (sense of self-efficacy and understanding one’s own capability and strengths), bravery and perseverance (willingness to face difficulties and shoulder responsibilities), and emotional distress (feelings of regret, dysphoria, and lacking control).

Hung [17] revised the scale to measure demoralization among high school students and to widen the application of the concept of demoralization. The demoralization experienced by high school students is similar to college students. Demoralized high school students and college students both experience subjective depression and agony, feel that no one understands them, and exhibit a certain level of suicidal ideation. However, some college students might show symptoms of depression such as loss of interest and social withdrawal. The differences between demoralization and depression inspired us to explore and gain a greater understanding of demoralization. Despite patients’ demoralization has been well documented, knowledge about normal population and the related factors is still evolving. Hence, investigating college students offers a better understanding of their demoralization status and the cultural influences.

Individual- and social-oriented views of self

Meaning of life is influenced by social expectations derived from cultural values, which shape individuals’ view of self [5, 7, 8]. Cultural values directly affect the development of meaning of life in college student, which in turn affects their demoralization level. In the present social environment of Taiwan, two substantially different cultural value systems coexist, namely social-oriented and individual-oriented cultural values [9]. We postulated that the coexistence of two cultural value systems causes cultural value conflicts in college students and contributes to the development of demoralization. Yang [18] defined social orientation as the combination of high fusion and low self-determination and individual (personal) orientation as the combination of high self-determination and low fusion. The interaction between Chinese people and their living environment is mainly social-oriented, whereas the interaction between Westerners (especially Americans) and their living environment is mainly individual-oriented. After compiling the aforementioned discourse on the individual- and social-oriented views of self, Lu [19] argued that the two are different in ontology and structure, function and operation, and self–society relationship.

The ontology and structure of the individual-oriented view of self is characterized by treating the self as a homeostatic and tangible entity, emphasizing individual uniqueness, valuing differences, maintaining consistency between the public self and private self, and considering the pursuit of self-transcendence as the ultimate expression of humanity. The ontology and structure of the social-oriented view of self is characterized by treating the self as a changeable and flexible entity, emphasizing the similarity between people, valuing the ordinary, and accepting—even encouraging—the difference between the public self and private self, pursuing self-expansion to include others, and achieving the ultimate goal of unity between nature and man.

In the individual-oriented view of self, social exchanges are regarded as the foundation of social relationships, emphasizing interpersonal competition, stressing the importance of rationality, and valuing expression of personal preferences. In the social-oriented view of self, symbiosis is regarded as the foundation of social relationships, emphasizing shared interpersonal relationship, stressing the importance of interpersonal affection and the practice of appropriate behavior and face-saving skills, and being sensitive to other people’s responses and evaluation, which comprise the social information from which self-knowledge is formed.

For the self–group relationships, the individual-oriented view of self emphasizes self-reliance, deems joining a group as a personal choice, stresses the importance of maintaining in-group psychological distance, prioritizes the pursuit of personal goals and pleasure, and emphasizes personal well-being. By contrast, the social-oriented view of self centers on belonging to and integrating into social groups, stresses the importance of in-group integration, and prioritizes the pursuit of group goals and the well-being of the group even at the expense of personal interests.

For the self–society relationship, the individual-oriented view of self advocates the antinomic relationship between self and society, considers personal emotions and attitudes as a behavioral guide, emphasizes dominance over the environment, and relies on self-reinforcement and self-growth to gain self-esteem and social respect. By contrast, the social-oriented view of self advocates the integrated relationship between self and society, abides by social rules and norms, emphasizes sensitivity to situations, demands that individuals assume social roles and fulfill the responsibilities of such roles, emphasizes adapting to the environment, and relies on self-criticism and commitment to self-improvement to avoid social punishment and gain social affirmation.

Lu [19] systematically distinguished the differences between these two cultural values (i.e., individual- and social-oriented views of self) and recruited college students and adults from northern, central, and southern Taiwan to participate in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire comprised a 41-item Inventory for Individual-Oriented View of Self and a 44-item Inventory for Social-Oriented View of Self. Factor analysis was performed to extract four factors each from the two cultural values. The four factors of the individual-oriented view of self were independence, self-determination, competition, and consistency, whereas those of the social-oriented view of self were contextual self, interpersonal relatedness, self-cultivation, and social sensitivity. Numerous studies have reported that the difference between individual and social orientation is also reflected in diverse aspects, such as achievement motivation and self-actualization—two concepts relevant to this study, which are introduced in the following sections.

Easterners and Westerners have distinct behavioral performance and cognitive processes [20-23]. Iyengar and Lepper [20] conducted empirical research to explore the achievement motivation of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. They discovered that the achievement motivation of white children is closely related to self-determination. During the experiment, white children exhibited high motivation only in self-determination situations, whereas Asian children exhibited high motivation and superior behavior in both self-determination and in-group determination situations. Asian children demonstrated particularly high motivation in in-group determination situations. Accordingly, Asian children are motivated by self-determination and social expectations to pursue achievements. Chen [23] reported that ethnic Chinese people and Westerners differ in achievement motivation, attribution of success and failure, and responses to goal conflicts. People with a high individual-oriented achievement motivation attribute success to internal factors and failure to external factors, and tend to engage in direct communication. People with a high social-oriented achievement motivation attribute success to external factors (no attribution of success when no bystanders are present) and failure to internal factors, and tend to engage in indirect communication when faced with conflicts. In sum, the establishment of achievement motivation is fundamentally different between Westerners and ethnic Chinese people from childhood. In addition, the attribution of success and failure differs between Westerners and ethnic Chinese people. Fundamental attribution error in Western psychology may not apply to ethnic Chinese people because Chinese society expects modesty from individuals. Ethnic Chinese people and Westerners differ considerably in terms of self-actualization and achievement motivation. Yang and Lu [6] combined qualitative and quantitative methods to study the characteristics of eastern and western self-actualizers, and recruited college students, graduate students, and adults from Taiwan and China as participants. They suggested that individual-oriented self-actualizers stand out from the crowd and become independent individuals, whereas social-oriented self-actualizers value their obligations and values regarding relationships with family, groups, country, and society, in addition to expressing their individuality.

Development of bicultural self

Yang [10] recruited Taiwanese college students as participants and observed that the values of submission to authority, conservation and endurance, and male dominance have been gradually replaced by the value of egalitarianism and open-mindedness. Male dominance has been gradually replaced by gender equality, but filial piety and ancestral worship as well as fatalism and defensiveness still coexist with optimism and assertiveness, independence and self-reliance, and respect for emotions despite changes in the social environment. Said empirical study highlighted that not all traditional Chinese values are replaced by modern values and that the two coexist. Hwang [24] selected a sample of college students and asked them to describe their own values and beliefs as well as those of their parents and older people, thereby exploring generational differences in values. The results indicated that in terms of crucial and core values, the college students did not differ much from their parents. Accordingly, traditional and modern cultural values can coexist and even merge into a new value system, despite generational changes. Lu [25] conducted a focus group with 25 Taiwanese people aged 22–60 years. After compiling various interview data, Lu [25] found that self-construal in modern Taiwanese society is neither completely interdependent (traditional values) nor completely independent (modern and Western values); instead, people employ a composite self-construal process in which the two coexist. According to the aforementioned study results, Taiwanese people in contemporary society endorse both the individual- and social-oriented views of self.

Yang [26] proposed four steps in the evolution or coordination process of the psychology and behavior of individual and social orientation: coexistence→combination→fusion→integration. Through the aforementioned continuous and complex process, ethnic Chinese people integrate the psychology and behavior derived from the social- and individual-oriented views of self with the objective of forming a well-integrated bicultural self. Yang [26] asserted that to form such an ideal self, individuals must continually strengthen their ego strength, ego competence, and ego resiliency during the development of the self. Individuals derived from the manifestation of the bicultural self in thoughts, emotions, desires, motives, and goals as well as adopt rational methods to eliminate these contradictions and resolve relevant conflicts.

However, according to our observations, college students struggle to form an integrated bicultural identity without appropriate guidance from teachers, peers, and the external environment because contradictory cultural values are conducive to confusion. Without proper guidance and sufficient self-exploration, college students may stay at unintegrated self with low individual- and low social-oriented views. They might lack motivation and enthusiasm for their work, even loss of meaning, goals, and hope. College graduates with unintegrated self-entering the workforce are likely to experience contradictions and conflicts during the integration of two cultural values. To exacerbate matters, they may not know how to approach the situation, lose the meaning and goal of life, and eventually develop demoralization. Additional attention should be paid to this vulnerable group, and they should be provided with relevant support.

Overview of the present study

Nowadays, college students usually feel confused, loss motivation and have demoralization about their life. Taiwanese college students are simultaneously subject to two cultural values coexist within each individual; therefore, they may have conflicts and contradictions during the development of self-identity. The goals of this study focused on the cultural factors contributing to college students’ demoralization to explore the effect of two cultural value systems on demoralization. Three research questions were included in this study: (a) what is the students’ demoralization status, (b) what is the student’ individual- and social-oriented views of self? The predominate research question driving this study is, what is the relationship between students’ individual- and social-oriented views of self and their demoralization among college student in Taiwan?

Methods

Participants

Taiwanese students (N = 356) from various universities participated in this study. They completed the questionnaire with an online questionnaire. Table 1 lists the distribution of the sample, which excluding 110 incomplete questionnaires and excluding 86 questionnaires to balance variables such as sex and school region. The study was approved by and following the guideline of the local ethics committee (Research Ethics Committee at the National Taiwan University, IRB no. 202104ES027). All participants read and agreed online informed consent.

Table 1

Distribution of the sample.

School region	Freshman (men/women)	Sophomore (men/women)	Junior (men/women)	Senior (men/women)	Regional total
Northern Taiwan	20/15	16/22	9/15	8/13	53/65
Central Taiwan	20/16	13/13	25/14	11/21	69/64
Southern Taiwan	10/21	10/14	12/19	9/10	41/64
Total	50/52	39/49	46/48	28/44	163/193

Instruments

All data are available in S1 Appendix.

Mandarin version of Demoralization scale (DS-M-25)

The Mandarin version of Demoralization scale (DS-M-25) was guided by the demoralization scale for cancer patients [16] and its translated Mandarin version as DS-M-25 scale [2, 27]. In the DS-M-25 scale, the measurement (of demoralization) was including five factors comprising the following dimensions: life meaning; loneliness and helplessness; self-assurance; bravery and perseverance; and emotional distress. Five items were generated for each dimension, since the scale was designed for adolescents, negative-worded items were minimized to reduce the cognitive burden of participants. The 25 items using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree) to indicate the extent to which they agreed (or disagreed) with the items. Specifically, it shows good internal consistency and test–retest reliability for both adolescent and young adults [17]. The instrument was similar to our prior study, which was including detailed validity of DS-M scale [17, 27].

Individual- and Social-oriented Self scale (ISS)

The Individual- and Social-oriented Self scale (ISS) was developed with dual 4-factor structure of the ISS subscales encompassed the key dimensions of the initial theoretical frameworks and broadly covers well-documented cultural differences in the self, including independence versus interdependence, cross-situational consistency versus context sensitivity, and other- versus self-focus [19, 28]. The 40-item ISS scale was a conglomeration of the individual- versus social-oriented self-dichotomy [28]. The measurement of individual-oriented self (ISS-I) was including four factors comprising the following dimensions: independence; self-determination; competition; and consistency. In addition, the measurement of social-oriented self (ISS-S) was including four factors comprising the following dimensions: contextual self; interpersonal relatedness; self-cultivation; and social sensitivity. Five items were generated for each dimension using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree) to indicate the extent to which they agreed (or disagreed) with the items. According to previous studies, the ISS scale has revealed good reliability and validity [19, 28–31].

Data analysis

For each scale, the overall score was based on all dimensions; in addition, sub-scores were formed with 5-item in each dimension. SPSS package version 21.0 was used for data analysis, and three main analysis methods were adopted. First, one-way ANOVAs were used to examine the differences among dimensions in each scale. Then, we used the mean of the overall ISS-I/ISS-S score as the cut-off point, and a 2×2 factorial design was allowed us to examine the effects of ISS-I/ISS-S (each with high/low levels) on their demoralization. Therefore, all participants were divided into four groups, namely bicultural self (high ISS-I × high ISS-S), individual-oriented self (high ISS-I × low ISS-S), social-oriented self (low ISS-I × high ISS-S), and unintegrated self (low ISS-I × low ISS-S). Two-way ANOVAs were to explore the differences in the demoralization scores of college students with distinct individual- or social-oriented views of self. Subsequently, Scheffe’s post hoc test was performed. Third, the multiple regression model was used to explore the association between demoralization score and the measurement of individual-oriented self (ISS-I)/social-oriented self (ISS-S) among 356 participants. The α value was at the level of adjusted p values < 0.05. for the analysis.

Results

College students’ demoralization, individual- and social-oriented view of self

Table 2 presents the demoralization, ISS-I and ISS-S scores in the four groups. In the demoralization scores, “emotional distress” was significant higher than other dimensions, indicating that they face uncertainty concerning their future career during their current life stage, which may result in dysphoria and a sense of lack of control. Also, the “bravery and perseverance” was significant lower than other dimensions, suggesting that they have more opportunities for self-development during their time in college; some students even moved out of their parents’ home for college, which enables them to learn and take responsibility for themselves.

Table 2

College students’ demoralization and individual/social-oriented view of self.

	Bicultural self	Individual-oriented	Social-oriented	Unintegrated self	All participants
	(n = 99)	(n = 73)	(n = 63)	(n = 121)	(n = 356)
Demoralization
Meaning of life	2.21±0.65	2.56±0.72	2.58±0.80	2.86±0.68	2.57±0.74
Loneliness and helplessness	2.51±0.77	2.67±0.77	2.46±0.86	2.58±0.77	2.46±0.77
Self-affirmation	2.07±0.62	2.31±0.74	2.60±0.82	2.79±0.72	2.56±0.79
Courage and tenacity	1.84±0.49	2.15±0.51	2.40±0.62	2.60±0.54	2.26±0.62
Emotional distress	2.65±0.63	2.76±0.64	3.14±0.69	3.12±0.64	2.92±0.68
Overall score	2.26±0.50	2.49±0.53	2.64±0.62	2.79±0.54	2.55±0.58
Individual-oriented view of self
Independence	4.42±0.34	4.22±0.39	4.09±0.40	3.83±0.51	4.12±0.48
Autonomy	3.58±0.57	3.42±0.61	2.52±0.66	2.66±0.52	3.05±0.73
Competition	3.47±0.63	3.14±0.61	2.62±0.53	2.57±0.52	2.95±0.69
Consistency	3.44±0.71	3.18±0.63	2.45±0.70	2.48±0.56	2.88±0.78
Overall ISS-I score	3.72±0.36	3.49±0.21	2.92±0.20	2.88±0.23	3.25±0.46
Social-oriented view of self
Situational self	4.32±0.38	3.88±0.43	4.27±0.39	3.82±0.48	4.05±0.48
Interpersonal connection	3.86±0.51	2.93±0.59	3.66±0.52	2.90±0.49	3.31±0.68
Self-cultivation	4.06±0.44	3.32±0.46	3.79±0.36	3.17±0.40	3.56±0.56
Social sensitivity	3.00±0.35	2.45±0.53	2.96±0.40	2.50±0.42	2.71±0.49
Overall ISS-S score	3.81±0.28	3.15±0.24	3.67±0.18	3.10±0.24	3.41±0.40

Note. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; ISS-I, individual-oriented self; ISS-S, social-oriented self.

In the ISS scale, college students scored the highest on independence—pertaining to the individual-oriented view of self—followed by contextual self, self-cultivation, and interpersonal relatedness—pertaining to the social-oriented view of self. Self-determination, with the fifth highest score, is associated with the individual-oriented view of self. There was no significant difference between independence and contextual self. Taiwanese college students live in an integrated bicultural environment, rather than in a context where individual orientation overpowers social orientation; this concurs with the bicultural self perspective [10, 24, 25, 32–34]. Although academia is dominated by personal orientation and emphasizes the value of independent thinking and critical thinking [35], social-oriented cultural values such as relationship orientation, interpersonal affection, and face [36] still substantially influence college students’ interaction.

Differences in the influence on demoralization level between individual- and social-oriented views of self

The mean of the overall ISS-I/ISS-S score was as the cut-off point, and a 2×2 factorial design was allowed us to examine the effects of ISS-I/ISS-S on their demoralization. Four groups with bicultural self (high ISS-I × high ISS-S), individual-oriented self (high ISS-I × low ISS-S), social-oriented self (low ISS-I × high ISS-S), and unintegrated self (low ISS-I × low ISS-S) comprised 99, 73, 63, and 121 college students. Table 3 presents the results of demoralization scores yielded by these four groups.

Table 3

Demoralization overall score among four groups.

Grouping	Demoralization overall score(M ± SD)	F-value	Scheffe’spost-hoc test
Bicultural self (n = 99)	2.26±0.50	18.44***	U > B;
Individual-oriented self (n = 73)	2.49±0.53		U > I;
Social-oriented self (n = 63)	2.64±0.62		S > B;
Unintegrated self (n = 121)	2.79±0.54		I > B

Note. N, number; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; B, Bicultural self; I: Individual-oriented self; S: Social-oriented self; U, Unintegrated self;

***p < .001.

The demoralization overall score of bicultural self group was significant lower than other groups, indicating college students with an integrated bicultural self help them to reduce the occurrence of demoralization. Accordingly, college students with a bicultural view of self were more adaptive than their counterparts with either an individual- or social-oriented view of self. A higher level of demoralization was observed in the unintegrated self group than in the individual-oriented group possibly because college students develop their ideal self on the basis of individual orientation and develop their ought self according to social orientation. The ideal self facilitates the establishment of career goals and prevents occurrence of demoralization.

In sum, the current results suggest that college students’ identification with cultural value influences the occurrence of demoralization. College students who identified with bicultural values were less demoralized than those who identified with either or neither of the cultural values, which implies that college students with an integrated bicultural view of self are more adaptive than their counterparts who endorse either the individual- or social-oriented view of self.

Correlations of demoralization with individual- and social-oriented view of self

Table 4 presents the associations between demoralization score and the measurement of individual-oriented self (ISS-I)/social-oriented self (ISS-S). For ISS-I, moderate to weak negative correlations were observed between demoralization scores and individual-oriented view of self. Competition was significant positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, suggesting that competition involves affirming self-worth through interpersonal competition and personal achievement. A previous study had explored Taiwanese college students’ suppression of emotional expression in interpersonal context and discovered that they refrain from expressing positive emotions to avoid excessive bragging and attracting jealousy and resentment [37]. Undergraduate education in Taiwan encourages cooperation and emphasizes management of interpersonal relationships. College students who are excessively competitive with their classmates easily become socially excluded, which makes them feel frustrated, lonely, and helpless in interpersonal relationships. Competition is a cultural value that is prevalent in the west, but it may not be endorsed by Taiwanese college students because it does not facilitate adaptability and development of self-worth. College students who overemphasize peer competition are unlikely to obtain a positive meaning of life and likely to experience loneliness.

Table 4

Association between demoralization score and individual-oriented self (ISS-I)/social-oriented self (ISS-S) among 356 participants.

	Meaning of life		Loneliness & helplessness		Self-assurance		Courage and tenacity		Emotional distress		Demoralization Overall score
	β	p	β	p	β	p	β	p	β	p	β	p
Individual-oriented view of self
Independence	-.298	<.001	-.330	<.001	-.199	<.001	-.447	<.001	-.088	.071	-.334	<.001
Self-determination	-.129	.015	-.352	<.001	.009	.874	-.280	<.001	-.338	<.001	-.263	<.001
Competition	.111	.026	.152	.001	.326	<.001	.076	.071	.150	.002	.208	<.001
Consistency	-.255	<.001	-.190	<.001	-.206	<.001	-.193	<.001	-.302	<.001	-.284	<.001
Overall score	-.312	<.001	-.478	<.001	-.014	.808	-.495	<.001	-.469	<.001	-.426	<.001
Social-oriented view of self
Contextual self	-.169	.002	-.229	<.001	-.144	.012	-.300	<.001	-.001	.984	-.207	<.001
Interpersonal relatedness	-.264	<.001	-.086	.136	-.162	.010	-.006	.919	-.137	.027	-.168	.004
Self-cultivation	-.147	.019	-.309	<.001	-.039	.549	-.396	<.001	-.207	.002	-.263	<.001
Social sensitivity	.205	<.001	.310	<.001	.254	<.001	.222	<.001	.236	<.001	.306	<.001
Overall score	-.153	.005	-.036	.489	-.072	.227	-.139	.005	.095	.079	-.075	.154

For ISS-S, moderate to weak negative correlations were observed between demoralization scores and social-oriented view of self. Social sensitivity was significant positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, self-assurance, and emotional distress, suggesting that social sensitivity means to value interpersonal harmony and pay special attention to the evaluation of others. A previous study had showed that college students’ fear of negative evaluation was positively correlated with depression, negatively correlated with social self-efficacy, and positively correlated with shyness [38]. College students who are afraid of negative evaluation tend to feel nervous and are unlikely to affirm themselves. Also, a weak and positive correlation was observed between social sensitivity and loneliness and helplessness, self-assurance, and emotional distress, suggesting that those students without sufficient social skills tend to feel lonely and helpless. A social-oriented view of self helped reduce demoralization, but social sensitivity strengthened these three dimensions of demoralization. As explained in the previous chapter, well-managed interpersonal relationships that are based on the social-oriented self can prevent demoralization, whereas excessive concern over others’ opinions aggravates demoralization.

In summary, college students with a well-integrated bicultural self were significantly less demoralized than those with an unintegrated self. Most dimensions of demoralization in college students were significant negatively correlated with individual- and social-oriented views of self. Accordingly, college students’ individual- and social-oriented views of self may prevent the occurrence of demoralization. However, competition was positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, whereas social sensitivity was weakly positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, self-assurance, and emotional distress, suggesting that two dimensions (i.e., competition and social sensitivity) had little effect on college students’ demoralization.

Discussion

Traditional Chinese cultural values coexist with modern values rather than being replaced

College students had significant higher scores of the emotional distress than on other demoralization dimensions. Accordingly, college students’ demoralization mostly manifests in uneasiness and anxiety. The factors of individual- and social- oriented views of self with the highest to lowest influence on the participants are as follows: independence, contextual self, self-cultivation, interpersonal relatedness, self-determination, competition, consistency, and social sensitivity. These top ranking factors comprise a mixture of elements from both individual- and social-oriented views of self, suggesting that Taiwanese college students might have bicultural self to influence their thoughts and interpersonal relationships. Of all factors of self-view in college students, competition and social sensitivity were the only factors that aggravate college students’ demoralization.

Numerous studies have supported that modern-day ethnic Chinese people live in a bicultural environment in which they develop a bicultural self that integrates individual- and social-oriented views of self [18, 24, 25, 32–34]. According to the current results, three of the top five self-view factors ranked by college students are social-oriented factors, which indicates that traditional Chinese cultural values have been subtly incorporated into modern thought, rather than disappearing over time. Our findings are consistent with the perspective of Yang [26] that the formation of the Chinese bicultural self is a continuous process. The binary opposite system of self enables Taiwanese college students who are subject to Chinese culture to adjust themselves constantly in response to temporal and spatial changes over time.

The top four cultural values endorsed by Taiwanese college students were independence, contextual self, self-cultivation, and interpersonal relatedness, whereas the bottom three were competition, consistency, and social sensitivity. The cultural values of Taiwanese college students are manifested in independent thinking, emphasis on interpersonal cooperation, and self-expression adjustment according to different situations, occasions, and role-relationships. The self-view of modern-day Taiwanese college students includes individual-oriented dependent thinking while retaining the social-oriented interdependent and ensembled self because they still wish to maintain a harmonious relationship with others. These aforementioned finding concurs with the concept of composite self proposed by Lu [25]. Therefore, college students still incorporate the value of interdependence into their everyday practices while pursuing independence, such an integrated composite self in turn affects individual adaptation to life changes.

College students’ cultural value identification and integration affects their demoralization level

According to the demoralization, the bicultural self, individual-oriented self, and social-oriented self groups had lower scores than the unintegrated self group. This indicates that college students’ development of any type of self-view can help reduce the occurrence of demoralization. College students with an integrated bicultural self were less demoralized than were their counterparts who identified with either or neither of the two cultural value systems. Demoralization results from individuals’ difficulties in identifying goals and the meaning of life [5, 12, 39]. Cultural values facilitate individuals’ development of meaning in life [6-8], which in turn affects the occurrence of demoralization. The current study discovered that both individual- and social-oriented cultural values were significantly correlated with demoralization. The bicultural self group had a significant lower demoralization than the unintegrated self group. Our result is consistent with previous studies on bicultural self, which have advocated that a bicultural composite self positively affects the adaptability of individuals [40-43].

From the perspective of cultural psychology, self-construal reflects people’s thoughts, emotions, and actions as well as how they view the world, themselves, and the external world, including their relationships and other people and things, all of which affect how they think and act [44]. Two considerably different cultural values coexist in Taiwan’s social environment, including individual- and social-oriented cultural values [9]. The lack of compatibility and complementarity between these two cultural value systems may result in cultural conflicts during the self-construal of college students, which in turn affects their demoralization level. People who fail to integrate said two cultural systems and develop a composite self-construal—similar to the effect of failing to integrate internal self-discrepancy—are likely to experience anxiety, disappointment, sadness, and depression, eventually losing their life goals and developing demoralization. Therefore, the social environment in which people live determines the type of people they wish to become [6]; these cultural values shape people’s view of self and meaning of life [8], eventually affecting the occurrence of demoralization.

College students’ demoralization is associated with cultural compatibility

The ranking of the influence of individual- and social-oriented cultural values on college students, from highest to lowest, is as follows: independence, contextual self, self-cultivation, interpersonal relatedness, self-determination, competition, consistency, and social sensitivity. Of these cultural values, competition was positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, and social sensitivity was positively correlated with loneliness and helplessness, emotional distress, and self-assurance. College students identified the least with competition and social sensitivity, both of which contributed to the occurrence of demoralization. Thus, the consistency between college students’ view of self and the culture they are exposed to directly affected the occurrence of demoralization, which concurs with related literature advocating that bicultural adaptation difficulties can lead to demoralization.

Yeh, Bedford [45] proposed the concept of relating autonomy in the dual autonomy model of Chinese people, which represents the volitional self-adjustment of Chinese people to maintain a harmonious and dependent connection with significant others because they value interpersonal harmony. Although Taiwanese college students pursue interpersonal harmony, this study revealed that they still prioritize independence as the most crucial value they express in private contexts. That is, Taiwanese college students may still maintain certain levels of self-determination, which they hide from others, in the pursuit of interpersonal harmony. Such a phenomenon resembles self-effacing behavior in ethnic Chinese people, which is in fact tactical self-enhancement in disguise. Ethnic Chinese people do not truly believe that they are inadequate or inferior, and they only self-efface to achieve interpersonal harmony and conform to social expectations [46, 47]. Whether the current findings are the result of the influence of doctrine of the mean or self-cultivation—emphasized in the Chinese cultural system—warrants further investigation.

This study is limited by a lack of data to distinguish the developmental changes of the individual- and social-oriented views of self. Moreover, the small sample size of this study may not have enough power to demonstrate the influences of different cultural values. Therefore, it warrants further investigations with larger samples and different experimental designs to validate our findings.

Conclusion

Despite increased screening for depression in colleges, demoralization symptoms in college students are often either missed or dismissed. Our results suggest that it is important to help students to develop a bicultural self to cope with changes in time. Furthermore, in college, teachers should be able to identify and recognize the demoralization symptoms, is an important goal for future research.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

2 Dec 2021

Relationship between Demoralization of the College Student with their Individual- and Social-Oriented Self

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Fan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I went over the manuscript and agreed with the two reviewers to recommend major revision for the following reasons:

• The introduction needs to be revised. For example, there is quite more words on the description of depression.

• The theoretical and conceptual value of this paper is unclear.

• It is not very clear how this paper builds from the extant literature and fills the important gap in this field.

• The data collection part is missing - how to collect the data for the study and when.

• The conclusion section should consider the limitations of the research, causes and solutions, etc.

• End the discussion elucidating the important contribution to the literature.

• Reference needs to be improved, such as formatting needs to match, and selection of more literature from regions other than Taiwan may be more representative.

We hope that these recommendations, when considered, will improve the quality of manuscript notch higher. We therefore request you to revise the paper following my and reviewer's recommendations.

Thanks so much.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 16 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fraide Agustin Ganotice, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Please change "female” or "male" to "woman” or "man" as appropriate, when used as a noun (see for instance https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/gender).

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is interesting with significant volume of informations. The research instruments are adequate for study organisation and qualitative data. The results and discussions should appear to be related with their individual social oriented self. The conclusions are relevant for the topic. I consider that the authors do a good job and the manuscript and the subject matter is very interesting for the journal.

1. It seems that regression analysis is necessary to analyze the purpose of the study. Correlation analysis alone is problematic in interpreting the relationship between variables.

2. Previous studies are mainly Taiwanese journals. If you present a foreign journal together, it will be a better thesis.

3. The bibliography presentation in the text must be matched. Please match either year or number according to the academic form.

Reviewer #2: Background

1. Other than the meaning of life, the authors should also elaborate more on how "low individual- and low social-oriented self" would influence/inform other components of demoralization (e.g, self-affirmation, courage and tenacity, emotional distress).

Methods/Materials

2. The authors should mention how the total scores of demoralization, individual- and social-oriented self were computed.

3. The authors should indicate if there are any previous studies supporting the validity of the two scales.

Data Analysis

4. Is there any reason(s) why the mean scores of the participants' individual and social orientation were used as the cutoff point? Given that the mean scores of "Independence" and "Situational self" were relatively high (over 4), low individual orientation/low social orientation groups may contain students who were high in independence and situational self.

5. The authors should mention the statistical procedure used to rank the individual- and social-oriented cultural values.

Results

6. Table 2 should report the descriptive statistics of the total scores of demoralization, individual- and social-oriented self. Similarly, table 4 should report the correlations between the total scores of demoralization, individual- and social-oriented self.

7. Given that the study hypothesized that "low individual- and low social-oriented self" would inform the development of demoralization, it is not clear that the findings of "competition" and "social sensitivity" contradicted the hypothesis.

8. Were any variables considered as possible co-variates?

Discussion

9. A discussion of limitations of the study should be included.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

16 Feb 2022

Dear Editor:

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to revise and resubmit our manuscript entitled “Relationship between Demoralization of the College Student with their Individual- and Social-Oriented Self” to PLOS ONE. The submitted manuscript has been approved by all the authors. We would like to thank you and the reviewers for the valuable comments.

We have revised this manuscript according to the comments of reviewers. In addition, we have provided our detailed responses to the comments following this cover letter. The original manuscript number was PONE-D-21-20917. Uploaded, please kindly find the revised manuscript showing the changes in yellow highlights [PONE-D-21-20917 (Revised Manuscript with Track Changes)] and a clean copy of the revised manuscript [PONE-D-21-20917 (manuscript)]. Our point-by-point response to each comment from the reviewers [PONE-D-21-20917 (Response to Reviewers)] and this cover letter [PONE-D-21-20917 (cover letter)] are uploaded.

The present study is the first study the extent of the relationship between attitude towards demoralization, individual- and social-oriented views of self in college students. We found that college students with a bicultural view of self-demonstrated significantly lower levels of demoralization than other groups. Moreover, the five components of demoralization in college students were mostly significantly and negatively correlated with individual- and social-oriented views of self, indicating that college students’ bicultural views of self may contribute to or prevent demoralization.

We appreciate the helpful comments from the reviewers and the editor to strengthen the ultimate yield of this paper. We hope that this revised revision now meets the high standards of PLOS ONE and can be accepted for publication.

Sincerely yours,

Chuan-Yung Huang, Ph.D.

Li-Ying Fan, Ph.D.

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-20917 (Response to Reviewers).docx

Click here for additional data file.

23 Jun 2022

Relationship between Demoralization of the College Student with their Individual- and Social-Oriented Self

PONE-D-21-20917R1

Dear Dr. Fan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Fraide Agustin Ganotice, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript titled "Relationship between Demoralization of the College Student with their Individual- and Social-Oriented Self” to PLOS ONE. Two reviewers provided their take on the revised version and suggested acceptance. I am here to make a recommendation of acceptance too.

Before the paper’s publication, I hope you can consider the comments and suggestions given by the reviewers to improve your final manuscript.

Thanks so much.

Respectfully yours,

Fred Ganotice

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authors have been very responsive in responding to my comments, and my only remaining suggestions are minor, and I leave them to the discretion of the editor and authors.

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review this important research.

1. Consider adding more literature review and previous research findings on “unintegrated-self” (low in both individual- and social-oriented self) in the Introduction, as this is the most vulnerable group to demoralisation suggested in this research.

Reviewer #3: The research is oriented to the study of a relevant topic for cultural psychology. According to the structure of the manuscript: (1) The research problem is clearly described, making a coherent construction of the object of study, (2) The references used are relevant, (3) A methodological strategy adequately supported by the theory is proposed to achieve the stated objectives, (4) The presentation of the results is coherent and clear, (5) The discussion and conclusion are based on the results and adequate references are included to support the findings.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Jorge Vergara-Morales

**********

27 Jun 2022

PONE-D-21-20917R1

Relationship between Demoralization of the College Student with their Individual- and Social-Oriented Self

Dear Dr. Fan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Fraide Agustin Ganotice

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE