Literature DB >> 35793033

Toward automatic reformation at the orbitomeatal line in head computed tomography using object detection algorithm.

Shota Ichikawa1,2, Hideki Itadani2, Hiroyuki Sugimori3.   

Abstract

Consistent cross-sectional imaging is desirable to accurately detect lesions and facilitate follow-up in head computed tomography (CT). However, manual reformation causes image variations among technologists and requires additional time. We therefore developed a system that reformats head CT images at the orbitomeatal (OM) line and evaluated the system performance using real-world clinical data. Retrospective data were obtained for 681 consecutive patients who underwent non-contrast head CT. The datasets were randomly divided into one of three sets for training, validation, or testing. Four landmarks (bilateral eyes and external auditory canal) were detected with the trained You Look Only Once (YOLO)v5 model, and the head CT images were reformatted at the OM line. The precision, recall, and mean average precision at the intersection over union threshold of 0.5 were computed in the validation sets. The reformation quality in testing sets was evaluated by three radiological technologists on a qualitative 4-point scale. The precision, recall, and mean average precision of the trained YOLOv5 model for all categories were 0.688, 0.949, and 0.827, respectively. In our environment, the mean implementation time was 23.5 ± 2.4 s for each case. The qualitative evaluation in the testing sets showed that post-processed images of automatic reformation had clinically useful quality with scores 3 and 4 in 86.8%, 91.2%, and 94.1% for observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Our system demonstrated acceptable quality in reformatting the head CT images at the OM line using an object detection algorithm and was highly time efficient.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Deep learning algorithms; Object detection; Orbitomeatal line; You Look Only Once (YOLO)v5 model

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35793033     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01153-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  22 in total

1.  Classification of type of brain magnetic resonance images with deep learning technique.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sugimori; Hiroyuki Hamaguchi; Taro Fujiwara; Kinya Ishizaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Multiclass semantic segmentation and quantification of traumatic brain injury lesions on head CT using deep learning: an algorithm development and multicentre validation study.

Authors:  Miguel Monteiro; Virginia F J Newcombe; Francois Mathieu; Krishma Adatia; Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Enzo Ferrante; Tilak Das; Daniel Whitehouse; Daniel Rueckert; David K Menon; Ben Glocker
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-05-14

3.  A new reference line for the brain CT: the tuberculum sellae-occipital protuberance line is parallel to the anterior/posterior commissure line.

Authors:  Y I Kim; K J Ahn; Y A Chung; B S Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma.

Authors:  Vilaas S Shetty; Martin N Reis; Joseph M Aulino; Kevin L Berger; Joshua Broder; Asim F Choudhri; A Tuba Kendi; Marcus M Kessler; Claudia F Kirsch; Michael D Luttrull; Laszlo L Mechtler; J Adair Prall; Patricia B Raksin; Christopher J Roth; Aseem Sharma; O Clark West; Max Wintermark; Rebecca S Cornelius; Julie Bykowski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  CT for Treatment Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Code Stroke Primer.

Authors:  Christopher A Potter; Achala S Vagal; Mayank Goyal; Diego B Nunez; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Michael H Lev
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Generalized Radiographic View Identification with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiang Fang; Leah Harris; Wei Zhou; Donglai Huo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Imaging of acute stroke prior to treatment: current practice and evolving techniques.

Authors:  G Mair; J M Wardlaw
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A deep-learning method using computed tomography scout images for estimating patient body weight.

Authors:  Shota Ichikawa; Misaki Hamada; Hiroyuki Sugimori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.