| Literature DB >> 35790869 |
Kentaro Morikawa1, Daichi Kuroda2, Yasuhiro Inoue3.
Abstract
Epithelial folding is a universal biological phenomenon in morphogenesis, typical examples being brain gyri, villi of the intestinal tract, and imaginal discs in invertebrates. During epithelial morphogenesis, the physical constraints imposed by the surrounding microenvironment on epithelial tissue play critical roles in folding morphology. In this study, we focused on the asymmetry of the environmental constraints sandwiching the epithelial sheet and introduced the degree of asymmetry, which indicates whether the basal or apical side of the epithelium is closer to the constraint wall. Then, we investigated the relationship between the degree of asymmetry and epithelial folding morphology using three-dimensional vertex simulations. The results show that the folding patterns of the epithelial sheets change from spot patterns to labyrinth patterns and then to hole patterns as the degree of asymmetry changes. Furthermore, we examined the pattern formation in terms of the equation of out-of-plane displacement of the sheet derived from the mechanical energy functional.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35790869 PMCID: PMC9256595 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15343-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Schematic diagram of epithelial tissue and the elastic wall that provides physical constraint to simulate cell proliferation dynamics in our model. The elastic walls are located at the apical and basal sides of the epithelium, and the distance between them is denoted by and , respectively.
Model constants.
| Symbol | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Friction coefficient of vertices | |
| 20.0 | Constant of cell volume elasticity | |
| 0.256 | Constant of cell surface elasticity | |
| 0.1 | Constant of cell height elasticity | |
| 40.0 | Constant of surface collision | |
| 0.01 | Characteristic constant of constraint of elastic walls elasticity | |
| 1.0 | Cell volume at stress free state | |
| Cell surface area (hexagonal prism) at stress free state | ||
| 1.0 | Cell height at stress free state | |
| 1.0 | Threshold length of surface collision | |
| 1000 | Statistical average of cell cycle | |
| 10 | Standard deviation of cell cycle | |
| Δ | 0.0002 | Time step size for numerical integration of Eq. ( |
| 60 | Percentage of G1 phase in the cell cycle | |
| 20 | Percentage of S phase in the cell cycle | |
| 10 | Percentage of G2 phase in the cell cycle | |
| 10 | Percentage of M phase in the cell cycle |
Figure 2The initial condition and the results of the epithelial folding simulations. (a) Monolayer sheet as the initial condition. (b) Snapshots of epithelial folding simulated under the conditions of . All snapshots show the simulation results at time The closer the distance between the epithelial sheet and the elastic wall, the smaller the peak-to-peak distance of folding.
Figure 3Snapshots of epithelial folding simulated under the conditions of . (a) Apical surface. (b) Basal surface. All snapshots show the simulation results at time . The ridges on the apical surface are shorter when the degree of asymmetry is small (the basal side is closer to the elastic wall), and the length of ridges increases as increases. The reverse occurs with the folding patterns of the basal surface: the ridges become shorter as becomes larger.
Figure 4Relation between average wavenumber and the sum of distances between the cell sheet surfaces and walls . The upper right legends show the degree of asymmetry . (a) Apical-side results. (b) Basal-side results. The smaller the sum of distances between the sheet and walls, the smaller the average wavenumber of the folding. This is generally the case for the apical and basal sides.
Figure 5Binarized black-and-white images of the epithelial folding simulation results and the number of folds. (a) Relation between environment and folding pattern. The horizontal axis is the degree of asymmetry . The vertical axis is the sum of distances between the cell sheet surfaces and walls . (b) Relation between degree of asymmetry and number of outlines. The upper right legends show the sum of the distances between the cell sheet surfaces and walls . The number of outlines was smallest when was 0.5, and increased as deviated from 0.5.
Figure 6Simulation results for the mechanical model derived from the energy functional. (a) Initial state of displacement field . (b) Snapshots of displacement field under the conditions of = 0.0 to 1.0 at time = 2,000,000. (c) Binarized black-and-white images of the simulation results. (d) Relation between degree of asymmetry and number of outlines.