| Literature DB >> 27193152 |
Yasuhiro Inoue1, Makoto Suzuki2, Tadashi Watanabe3, Naoko Yasue2, Itsuki Tateo3, Taiji Adachi3, Naoto Ueno2.
Abstract
Neural tube closure is an important and necessary process during the development of the central nervous system. The formation of the neural tube structure from a flat sheet of neural epithelium requires several cell morphogenetic events and tissue dynamics to account for the mechanics of tissue deformation. Cell elongation changes cuboidal cells into columnar cells, and apical constriction then causes them to adopt apically narrow, wedge-like shapes. In addition, the neural plate in Xenopus is stratified, and the non-neural cells in the deep layer (deep cells) pull the overlying superficial cells, eventually bringing the two layers of cells to the midline. Thus, neural tube closure appears to be a complex event in which these three physical events are considered to play key mechanical roles. To test whether these three physical events are mechanically sufficient to drive neural tube formation, we employed a three-dimensional vertex model and used it to simulate the process of neural tube closure. The results suggest that apical constriction cued the bending of the neural plate by pursing the circumference of the apical surface of the neural cells. Neural cell elongation in concert with apical constriction further narrowed the apical surface of the cells and drove the rapid folding of the neural plate, but was insufficient for complete neural tube closure. Migration of the deep cells provided the additional tissue deformation necessary for closure. To validate the model, apical constriction and cell elongation were inhibited in Xenopus laevis embryos. The resulting cell and tissue shapes resembled the corresponding simulation results.Entities:
Keywords: 3D vertex simulation; Apical constriction; Cell elongation; Cell migration; Neural tube closure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27193152 PMCID: PMC5106510 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0794-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol ISSN: 1617-7940
Model parameters: values in the bracket () for inhibition models
| Symbol | Value | Descriptions |
|---|---|---|
| Physical parameters of the energy functions | ||
| | 80 | Volume elasticity of Eq. ( |
| | 1.0 | Area elasticity of Eq. ( |
| |
| Height elasticity of elongating cell of Eq. ( |
| |
| Apical circumference elasticity of Eq. ( |
| |
| Driving force of cell migration of Eq. ( |
| | 1.0 | Cell volume in stress-free state of Eq. ( |
| |
| Cell surface area (hexagonal prism) in stress-free state of Eq. ( |
| | 1.0, 3.0; (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5) | Original and elongated cell height in stress-free state of Eq. ( |
| |
| Apical circumference length in stress-free state of Eq. ( |
| | 0.90 | Constriction scaling factor in |
| Numerical parameters for computational simulations | ||
| | 1.0 | Friction coefficient of vertex of Eq. ( |
| |
| Time step size for numerical integration of Eq. ( |
| | 1.0 | Time interval at which the network reconnection rule is attempted |
| |
| Threshold edge length, below which a local network is reconnected |
Fig. 1a Initial shape of the double-layered ectoderm for simulations. The neural and non-neural cells are hexagonally packed in superficial and deep layers, with the superficial neural cells displayed in white. The basic energy function includes the cell volume elastic energy and cell surface elastic energy . The region of interest (ROI) is defined by the dashed rectangular region for visualization of the subsequent figures. A anterior, P posterior, M midline, L lateral side, D dorsal, V ventral. b Characteristic geometrical parameters on the tissue scale. The gap distance, , is the mean end-to-end distance between the two centroids of the apical surfaces on the lateral boundary cells of the neural plate. The tissue height H and width W of the neural plate are defined by the differences between the largest and smallest z- and x-components of the position vector of the neural cell centroid. Then, the tissue height/width ratio is defined as
Simulation models showing activation (+) and inhibition (−) of each physical event
| Model | Apical constriction | Cell elongation | Cell migration |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | + | − | − |
| II | + | + | − |
| III | + | + | + |
| IV | − | − | + |
| V | + | − | + |
Fig. 2Different combinations of the physical events during neural tube closure examined using a model I, b model II, and c model III are shown as snapshots over time. The migrating cells are outside of the visualized area except and 1.0 in the panel (c). d The apical/basal width ratio, , of the superficial neural cells as a function of time t. e The cell height/width ratio, , of the superficial neural cells as a function of time t. f The gap distance, , as a function of time t. g The tissue height/width ratio, , as a function of time t
Fig. 3Shapes of control, and MID1/2 and Shroom3 inhibited (AC/EL inhibition) embryos observed in silico and in vivo. Mediolateral cross-sectional views of the neural tissue shape at time in the simulations using a model III (control) and c model IV (AC/EL inhibition). b, d Dorsal side views at the dashed rectangular regions of (a, c). e, g The neural tissue and cells in vivo were observed by phalloidin staining (F-actin) at stage 16. f, h Bright field image of overall shape of the entire embryo at stage 16. The outlines e’, g’ show the neural tissue and cells, while i, j show the apical surface of the neural epithelial tissues, where six lines are obtained from six embryos. Comparisons between models III and IV show k the apical/basal width ratio, , and l the cell height/width ratio, , as functions of time. The circles mark the values at , which are compared with the experimental values. m, n The experimental values of those ratios at stage 16
Fig. 4Shapes of control, and MID1/2 inhibited (EL inhibition) embryos observed in silico and in vivo. The neural tube closure in the simulations using a model III with (control), b model III with (weak EL inhibition) and c model V with (complete EL inhibition). d, e Phalloidin staining (F-actin) at stages 19 for control and 21 for EL inhibition experiments. d’, e’ Outlines of neural tissues and cells. The solid-filled area indicates the lumen. f (from top to bottom) the cell height/width ratio , tissue height/width ratio , and lumen size (normalized by that of the control) in simulations. Comparisons between the control and EL inhibition embryos for g the cell height/width ratio, , h the tissue height/width ratio, , and i the lumen size in experiments
Fig. 5Effect of the elastic sheet underneath the deep layer on neural tube shapes were examined with and without cell elongation. Simulation results using model III (control) for a = 0, b =2, c =4, and using model V (EL inhibition) for d =0, e =2, f =4, in which is the sheet elastic constant normalized by the cell surface elastic constant . g Tissue height/width ratio, , as a function of
Fig. 6Effect of permutation of onset time of the apical constriction (AC), cell elongation (EL), and cell migration (CM) on the neural tube shape. The order of three events is a AC EL CM, b EL CM AC, c CM AC EL, d EL AC CM, e CM EL AC, f AC CM EL. The onset time of the first, second, and third events is 0.00, 0.25, and 0.49, respectively