| Literature DB >> 35788959 |
Bixiao Cui1,2, Yi Shan1,2, Tianhao Zhang3,4, Yan Ma5, Bin Yang5, Hongwei Yang1,2, Liqun Jiao5, Baoci Shan3,4,6, Jie Lu7,8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral ischemic status is an indicator of bypass surgery. Both hemodynamics and glucose metabolism are significant factors for evaluating cerebral ischemic status. The occurrence of crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) is influenced by the degree of supra-tentorial perfusion and glucose metabolism reduction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the CCD-related supra-tentorial blood flow and metabolic status before bypass surgery in patients with chronic and symptomatic ischemic cerebrovascular disease and the prognosis of surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral blood flow; Crossed cerebellar diaschisis; Glucose metabolism; Positron emission tomography/Magnetic resonance; Surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35788959 PMCID: PMC9374607 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01766-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Nucl Med ISSN: 0914-7187 Impact factor: 2.258
Fig. 1Example of a CCD-positive a and a CCD-negative b participant. a A 44-year-old man with ischemia in the left hemisphere due to left middle cerebral artery occlusion (white arrow). On arterial spin labeling (ASL)—cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET), supratentorial hemodynamic and metabolic impairment may be seen in the left hemisphere (white arrows). Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) on 18F-FDG PET images shown of the cerebellum (white arrow). b A 62-year-old man with ischemia in the right paracentral hemisphere due to right internal carotid artery occlusion (white arrow). On ASL-CBF imaging and 18F-FDG PET, supratentorial metabolic and hemodynamic impairment is shown in the right hemisphere (white arrows), No CCD was observed on the cerebellar 18F-FDG PET image. Red—infarct zone in the supratentorial hemisphere. Yellow—decreased blood flow regions. Blue—decreased metabolism regions. Green—co-decreased regions
Clinical characteristics of the CCD + and CCD− groups
| CCD + | CCD− | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 46(12) | 54(14) | 0.300 |
| Male (%) | 13(93) | 8(80) | 0.550 |
| Preprocedural, median (IQR) | |||
| Blood glucose (mmol/L), median (IQR) | 6.00(0.85) | 6.00(0.85) | 1.000 |
| Injection activity (MBq) | 302.11(53.00) | 295.08 (87.67) | 0.403 |
| Size of infarction, median (IQR) | 962.50(1820.00) | 44.00(112.75) | <0.001 |
| Baseline | |||
| NIHSS score, median (IQR) | 1.0(1.0) | 0.0(1.0) | 0.013 |
| mRS score, median (IQR) | 1.0(1.5) | 0.0(1.5) | 0.048 |
| Follow-up | |||
| NIHSS score, median (IQR) | 0.0(1.0) | 0.0(0.0) | 0.172 |
| mRS score, median (IQR) | 0.0(0.5) | 0.0(0.0) | 0.625 |
CCD crossed cerebellar diaschisis; CBF cerebral blood flow; AI asymmetry index; IQR interquartile range
Fig. 2Comparison of baseline and follow-up neurological scores between the two groups. Both NIHSS and mRS scores decreased after surgery in the CCD-positive (CCD +) group (P = 0.011, P = 0.008, Fig. 2a, b). No significant change was found in the CCD-negative (CCD−) group (P = 0.157, P = 0.157, Fig. 2c, d). The dots and bars stand for mean with range. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05
Fig. 3Comparison of parameters in the decreased blood flow region between the two groups. No difference in either CBF AI a or volume b was observed between the CCD-positive group and the CCD-negative group
Fig. 4Comparison of regions with decreased metabolism between the two groups. CCD-positive patients showed significantly higher metabolism AI a and larger volume b than CCD-negative patients. **P < 0.01
Fig. 5Comparison of parameters in a co-decreased region between the two groups. No difference in the CBF AI a between the CCD-positive group and the CCD-negative group. There was significantly higher metabolism AI b and larger volume c in CCD-positive patients. **P < 0.01
Parameters in different regions between CCD + and CCD− patients
| CCD + | CCD− | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased blood flow region | |||
| CBF AI (%), median (IQR) | 25.84(4.93) | 22.37(7.50) | 0.591 |
| Volume, median (IQR) | 9839.50(4794.00) | 8729.00(4943.75) | 0.364 |
| Decreased metabolism region | |||
| Metabolism AI (%), median (IQR) | 21.67(4.37) | 16.78(0.99) | 0.001 |
| Volume, median (IQR) | 9594.50(3947.75) | 4353.00(2732.00) | < 0.001 |
| Co-decreased region | |||
| CBF AI (%), median (IQR) | 27.28(5.08) | 25.50(10.28) | 0.733 |
| Metabolism AI (%), median (IQR) | 23.03(4.70) | 17.43(1.89) | 0.003 |
| Volume, median (IQR) | 6400.00(4150.25) | 2491.00(1814.00) | 0.005 |
CCD crossed cerebellar diaschisis; CBF cerebral blood flow; AI asymmetry index; IQR interquartile range
Fig. 6Correlations between neurological status and parameters. A significant correlation was observed between the NIHSS score and metabolism AI values in the decreased metabolism region (r = 0.621, P = 0.001) a and metabolism AI co-decreased region (r = 0.571, P = 0.004) b A more modest but significant correlation was found between the volume of the decreased metabolism region (r = 0.617, P = 0.001) c and the volume of the co-decreased region (r = 0.497, P = 0.014) d